Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

License GPLv3 is not appropriate #1

Open
hfiguiere opened this issue Jan 16, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

License GPLv3 is not appropriate #1

hfiguiere opened this issue Jan 16, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@hfiguiere
Copy link

TL;DR use LGPLv3 instead of GPLv3

The long version.

Disclaimer: I am Not A Lawyer. But I do have a good understanding of FLOSS, licenses and GPL.

The plugin is basically "linking" GPLv3 code to non-GPL compatible code (Lightroom). Therefor, implicitely, any third party shipping the 500pxPublisher plug-in would be in violation of the GPLv3, which would be copyright infringement.

While it could be argued that this is not the case, it is not nice.

The LGPLv3 was actually designed with that use case in mind and would preserve the copyleft nature of the license (the requirement to provide the source code) while allowing to "link" the code to Lightroom.

Other options would include using a non copyleft license like Apache v2, MIT or BSD.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant