You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Experts analyse the outputs of tests and compare them to a reference, according to various metrics depending on the type of test.
Some experts would benefit from improvements, some new experts addressing aspects not cheched at the moment should be developped:
To be improved:
pack2bin (gmkpack): retrieve path to gmkpack outputs when build fails ? to be printed in the stdout of the terminal ? (not sure it is possible)
fields: scatter plots or histogram of errors if normalized RMSE > threshold ? link with tecpaf/F.Suzat
DrHook: how to make it more reliable (at the moment way too volatile)
New experts:
DDH: epygram is able to read DDH files and could compare DDH outputs
EC_MEMINFO: in replacement of the RSS expert, get more information from EC_MEMINFO
Coding norms checker: for routines modified in branch, get norms checker outputs and set a "score": 0 if no improvement in norms checking violation, positive if some improvement, negative if introducing new violations. How to use the norms checker out of the box (Ryad) ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Experts analyse the outputs of tests and compare them to a reference, according to various metrics depending on the type of test.
Some experts would benefit from improvements, some new experts addressing aspects not cheched at the moment should be developped:
To be improved:
New experts:
EC_MEMINFO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: