Replies: 1 comment
-
Hey, To recreate the files, you need to use the pre-processing (see doc here). All the point of the trajectories are independent. I think to get the id, you should redo the split by hand, and then process each files (train and valid) indepdently. I don't think the training is sensitive to the split. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello! In #297 the information you provided around the validation energy MAEs was very helpful. I was wondering if you could help clarify one thing:
I was wondering if it is possible to recreate the HDF5 data you have provided as your train/val split. The reason I want to do this is to retrieve the mp-ids for each batch - when I looked into this, it seems difficult because:
The reason I would like to recreate your dataset exactly is because we have computed some dispersion corrections on the original MPTraj dataset, but I would also like to use your exact data split to make the comparison between the models fairer. Do you see a way for this to be possible?
If not, do you think that this will matter, or have you observed low variance when using different randomly held out splits of MPTraj? I couldn't quite tell from your pre-processing code if you are holding out entire trajectories from MPtraj for your validation set also, or if you consider each trajectory point to be independent from a dataset split perspective.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions