Replies: 3 comments
-
While MACE can predict energies and forces on charged molecule, it does not take total charges as input. Models that do that will be available in a few months. Secondly for molecular systems, I encourage use to use mace-off that is trained specifically for molecular systems. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Is MACE-OFF better even for inorganic systems like pure water or water with ions? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Got it. Thank you @ilyes319. I had to use mace-mp models, since the charged molecule has a transition metal. @nihil39 I think MACE-OFF supports only H, C, N, O, P, S, F, Cl, Br, I. See here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Describe the bug
While I am not sure if MACE-MP models are good for charged molecules, I wanted to give it a try. However, I see that MACE calculator doesn't take the charge into account. How should I set the
charge_key
in the MACE calculator? I tried different keywords (the default 'Qs', charges etc), but none worked so far. I believe this keyword is for the charges in the training set, but I tried it anyways since the calculator didn't make use of the charges set in theatoms
object. I'd appreciate any help.To Reproduce
The following script should reproduce the problem, you will get the same energy for the neutral and charged molecule.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions