Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Have a way to retrigger only one overlay instead of rebuilding all overlays if only one failed to push to container registry. #117

Open
pacospace opened this issue Jul 1, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@pacospace
Copy link

pacospace commented Jul 1, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
As Developer,

I have 10 overlays, but after 10/10 builds, one failed to push because write access was missing. Later we give write privilegies to the pipeline and we need to redeliver the same tag that would trigger again all 10 builds.

Describe the solution you'd like
OPTION 1: Have a way to retrigger only one overlay instead of rebuilding all overlays if only one failed.
OPTION 2: Introduce a check to verify write privileges are enabled with the secret-pusher before starting the pipeline (currently we check only if the repo is created on quay)

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context
Issue is the tag name, maybe overlay-tag as discussed with @harshad16

@goern
Copy link
Member

goern commented Jul 1, 2021

/kind feature
/priority important-longterm

@sesheta sesheta added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. labels Jul 1, 2021
@sesheta
Copy link
Contributor

sesheta commented Oct 16, 2021

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@sesheta sesheta added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 16, 2021
@sesheta
Copy link
Contributor

sesheta commented Nov 15, 2021

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten

@sesheta sesheta added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 15, 2021
@harshad16
Copy link
Member

/lifecycle frozen

@sesheta sesheta added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. labels Nov 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants