You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have blocked out in MOS a bunch of API calls to expose fatfs functionality. The jump table for fatfs API calls can be found in mos_api.asm at the label mos_api_block2_start:. Many of these API calls however currently return a "not implemented" result.
The following API calls are defined in our API, but not yet implemented:
ffs_api_fsync
ffs_api_fforward
ffs_api_fexpand
ffs_api_fgets
ffs_api_fputc
ffs_api_fputs
ffs_api_fprintf
ffs_api_ftell
ffs_api_fsize
ffs_api_ferror
ffs_api_dfindfirst
ffs_api_dfindnext
ffs_api_unlink
ffs_api_rename
ffs_api_chmod
ffs_api_utime
ffs_api_mkdir
ffs_api_chdir
ffs_api_chdrive
ffs_api_mount
ffs_api_mkfs
ffs_api_fdisk
ffs_api_getfree
ffs_api_getlabel
ffs_api_setlabel
ffs_api_setcp
NB is may not be appropriate to implement all of these calls. Some such as ffs_api_fputc essentially replicate functionality of existing mos_ APIs, and therefore would be low priority to implement. Some refer to fatfs functionality that our configuration on the Agon does not use, and therefore are already correctly returning "not implemented". Additionally some calls may require more arguments than we can readily accept with the eZ80's limited register set. We may/probably need to define a standard ABI for such calls requiring extra arguments.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have blocked out in MOS a bunch of API calls to expose fatfs functionality. The jump table for fatfs API calls can be found in
mos_api.asm
at the labelmos_api_block2_start:
. Many of these API calls however currently return a "not implemented" result.The following API calls are defined in our API, but not yet implemented:
NB is may not be appropriate to implement all of these calls. Some such as
ffs_api_fputc
essentially replicate functionality of existingmos_
APIs, and therefore would be low priority to implement. Some refer to fatfs functionality that our configuration on the Agon does not use, and therefore are already correctly returning "not implemented". Additionally some calls may require more arguments than we can readily accept with the eZ80's limited register set. We may/probably need to define a standard ABI for such calls requiring extra arguments.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: