You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would be good for consistency across the fi_ family of functions. Also, it would allow the implementation of a fi_pool_random() much more easily and consistently with fi_pool_cluster_random().
Downside is that it is slightly more clunky to vectorise fi_pool wrt pool_size and pool_number, but I don't think is major. Would need to check that fi_pool isn't being used in vectorised form already.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be good for consistency across the
fi_
family of functions. Also, it would allow the implementation of afi_pool_random()
much more easily and consistently withfi_pool_cluster_random()
.Downside is that it is slightly more clunky to vectorise
fi_pool
wrtpool_size
andpool_number
, but I don't think is major. Would need to check thatfi_pool
isn't being used in vectorised form already.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: