Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨[Feature Request]: Restyling the navbar for responsive screens #1106

Closed
4 tasks done
ayush-848 opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1132
Closed
4 tasks done

✨[Feature Request]: Restyling the navbar for responsive screens #1106

ayush-848 opened this issue Aug 1, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1132
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request gssoc

Comments

@ayush-848
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Feature Description

To position items and aligning them properly

Use Case

To position items and aligning them properly

Benefits

No response

Add ScreenShots

No response

Priority

High

Record

  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines
  • I'm a GSSOC'24 contributor
  • I have starred the repository
@github-actions github-actions bot added gssoc enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Hi there! Thanks for opening this issue. We appreciate your contribution to this open-source project. We aim to respond or assign your issue as soon as possible.

@ayush-848
Copy link
Contributor Author

@varshith257 please assign this to me

@varshith257
Copy link
Collaborator

/assign

@ayush-848 ayush-848 changed the title ✨[Feature Request]: Restyling the navbar ✨[Feature Request]: Restyling the navbar for responsive screens Aug 3, 2024
@ayush-848 ayush-848 mentioned this issue Aug 3, 2024
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request gssoc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants