-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 984
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HubNetworking: Deploy Azure Bastion into Availability Zones #1869
Comments
Hey @sebassem, as availability zones support for Bastion is in public preview as of May. Is this something we want to add to the backlog to add it in the future? Right now, it is pretty limited in what regions are supported as a heads up. |
Apologies, I hadn't spotted it was in preview before logging this! - This came back off a handover with a customer and noticing resources flagged as not being zone resilient. |
No worries, @integyjc, it's a good call out to make sure it's on our radar. |
Yes indeed, I added it to our backlog for the Bastion refresh. Thanks @oZakari |
Moving this to the upstream Enterprise-Scale repository for tracking. |
We don't currently deploy Bastion as part of this repo's accelerator (Portal), but is on the backlog and planned to be released as part of the next refresh (Policy Refresh FY25 Q3). As part of that implementation we will leverage Availability Zones for Bastion where possible. |
Describe the feature end to end, including deployment scenario details under which the feature would occur.
The current deployment of bastion doesn't configure zone redundancy. Enabling this feature for regions which support it would increase compliance with ALZ policies around zone resilience and provide a more robust deployment
Why is this feature important. Describe why this would be important for your organization and others. Would this impact similar orgs in the same way?
Availability, compliance, best practice
Please provide the correlation id associated with your error or bug.
xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx
Can you describe any alternatives that you have taken since this feature does not exist?
No response
Feature Implementation
Check previous GitHub issues
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: