Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update typescript-eslint monorepo to ^7.18.0 #2237

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 11, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) ^7.16.0 -> ^7.18.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) ^7.16.0 -> ^7.18.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v7.18.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] prevent runtime error when asserting a variable declared in default TS lib

  • eslint-plugin: [unbound-method] report on destructuring in function parameters

  • eslint-plugin: [no-duplicate-type-constituents] shouldn't report on error types

  • eslint-plugin: [strict-boolean-expressions] support branded booleans

❤️ Thank You
  • auvred
  • Oliver Salzburg
  • Vinccool96
  • Yukihiro Hasegawa

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.17.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: backport no-unsafe-function type, no-wrapper-object-types from v8 to v7

  • eslint-plugin: [return-await] add option to report in error-handling scenarios only, and deprecate "never"

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-floating-promises] check top-level type assertions (and more)

  • eslint-plugin: [strict-boolean-expressions] consider assertion function argument a boolean context

  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] false positive on optional private field

❤️ Thank You
  • Armano
  • Josh Goldberg ✨
  • Kirk Waiblinger
  • StyleShit

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.16.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-parameters] descend into all parts of mapped types in no-unnecessary-type-parameters
❤️ Thank You
  • Dan Vanderkam

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v7.18.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.17.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v7.16.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) December 11, 2024 16:32
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 3 times, most recently from 9f1ad93 to 58b4ee8 Compare December 11, 2024 22:13
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 58b4ee8 to 3067e60 Compare December 12, 2024 01:14
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 3a69a0c into main Dec 12, 2024
1 check passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch December 12, 2024 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants