Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

“Sharing on <dd. mm. jjjj> by <first name Last Name>" and “Checked on <dd. mm. jjjj> by <first name Last Name>" #2369

Closed
linux-lukas opened this issue Nov 15, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@linux-lukas
Copy link

Describe the feature you'd like

In BookStack I would still like to have the possibility of approval and examination. Then you could use BookStack as a productive environment in the school context.

Describe the benefits this feature would bring to BookStack users

A student creates an hourly log in BookStack. Then the student draws up the protocol – it could be checked and released by the specialist teacher after he was able to assess it professionally.

Additional context

@ssddanbrown
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the request @MorpheusSohn,

BookStack is not primarily intended for an education environment, so I wouldn't really look to implement any education specific features or have education-specific workflows being a primary driver for a new feature.

I could see how a general approval/review flow may benefit BookStack users in general though.
There are some existing features related to an approval/review flow: #2123 and #473.
Therefore I'm going to close this off as a duplicate.

@linux-lukas
Copy link
Author

@ssddanbrown The use in educational institutions was just one example - with this option BookStack would have features of a quality management system (QMS), which I would if there were, for example, an export to and an import from .odt and .md files. Since I'm unfortunately not that good at programming, I don't know to what extent it would be feasible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants