Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update text of *Utility* #383

Closed
j--- opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #428
Closed

Update text of *Utility* #383

j--- opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #428
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@j---
Copy link
Collaborator

j--- commented Nov 9, 2023

Should use proper decision point names, right?

In https://github.com/CERTCC/SSVC/pull/370/files/083057d3d22b89f5309d9685428981d3f26a9713#diff-1aa025f17397e8e205d3bd93b041e65477a806878e53a8f9e71a08454339d1ab

So "Value Density" instead of "value".
Suggest being a little more explicit
"Answer to Automatable is No and answer to Value Density is Diffuse " or something like that? Is there a reason for the way this is written more tersely / informally?

Originally posted by @j--- in #370 (comment)

@ahouseholder ahouseholder added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels Nov 17, 2023
@ahouseholder ahouseholder added this to the SSVC 202403 milestone Jan 23, 2024
@ahouseholder
Copy link
Contributor

Note that this change needs to be made in the python object where Utility is defined, not in the Markdown files.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants