Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rejected example is inconsistent with 4.5.3.7 in CNA Rules 4.0 #313

Closed
ElectricNroff opened this issue May 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ElectricNroff
Copy link

"value": "This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority."

https://www.cve.org/Resources/Roles/Cnas/CNA_Rules_v4.0.pdf says

4.5.3.7 When deciding to reject a published CVE Record, CNAs MUST use the formats and
mechanisms specified by the CVE Program and MUST provide an explanation.

"has been rejected or withdrawn" doesn't usefully serve as an explanation because it leaves the reader wondering whether it was rejected or whether it was withdrawn and why either of these two happened.

A better example (consistent with 4.5.3.6) would be

"value": "This CVE Record has been rejected because it is a duplicate of CVE-1900-12345."
```
@jayjacobs jayjacobs added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 18, 2024
ccoffin added a commit to ccoffin/cve-schema that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2024
… 4.0

Updated rejected example CVE Record to include a better rejectedReasons value. Fixes Issue CVEProject#313
ccoffin added a commit to ccoffin/cve-schema that referenced this issue Dec 30, 2024
… 4.0

Updated rejected example CVE Record to include a better rejectedReasons value. Fixes Issue CVEProject#313
@ccoffin
Copy link
Collaborator

ccoffin commented Dec 30, 2024

Fixed in the above commit #380. Closing

@ccoffin ccoffin closed this as completed Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants