-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Threads not showing up #141
Comments
Have you managed to run the sample successfully? |
Yep, and the sample is working as advertised. My actual app is relatively simple - one application thread - but that thread is extremely busy. Eventually the thread shows up in the Remotery UI, but the UI is very late to reflect any of the data. It's almost as if the Remotery thread is starved, but I can see up to date data for the Remotery thread's own profile timers. Perhaps I'll play with some of the remotery settings or instrument further to see what's happening. |
If the Remotery thread is working away then it suggests the reporting thread is doing fine. Possibilities:
Try removing some of your more frequent inner loop samples to see if it reduces the load and improves. You might find this issue of interest: #126 |
Thanks for the info, Don I did have a categorical timer wrapping a significant body of execution, so that absolutely was my problem. Should've been obvious to me that was the cause. I was getting some data in the UI that looked like hashes, and a few seconds later it filled in with readable names, so I jumped to the conclusion that I was overwhelming or starving the Remotery thread. Thanks against for your help, and for the great profiler, and for not making it header-only, and for providing an API that considers multi-DLL applications (SetGlobalInstance), etc etc! |
Great, glad you got it sorted. Thanks for the comments! |
Anyone know why threads wouldn't show up? In a simple test with one thread pushing timers, I only see the Remotery thread in the UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: