Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG]: AEBN search issue #318

Open
joca879 opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 9 comments
Open

[BUG]: AEBN search issue #318

joca879 opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 9 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@joca879
Copy link

joca879 commented Aug 30, 2024

Mandatory

Describe the bug:

Not able to match a title that is on AEBN site, namely the movie "2 x 10" from Bijou Studios.
It gives this error message in the log "ERROR (utils:5484) - AEBN - SEARCH:: ❌ File: init.py, Line: 279, Function: _process_function_call -> _search -> search"

Specific Agent(s) Causing the Issue:

AEBN

Index Site URL(s) Attempting to Match:

https://gay.aebn.com/gay/search?queryType=Free+Form&query=2%20x%2010

Log Attached:

com.plexapp.agents.AEBN.log

Optional

Screenshot(s) with all nudity redacted:

Additional Context:

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]
@joca879 joca879 added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 30, 2024
@joca879
Copy link
Author

joca879 commented Aug 31, 2024

No one else has had a similar issue with AEBN agent search?

@fourstix
Copy link

Hi,
I'm not sure why it doesn't match on AEBN but I have this same movie named as "(Paladin) - 2x10" (different studio and without spaces in the name) so that it matches on GEVI.

@joca879
Copy link
Author

joca879 commented Sep 1, 2024

Unfortunately I have other movies that are not in GEVI and AEBN gives the same error when I try to match.
AEBN must have changed something in their site and now the search on the PGMA agent does not work

@fourstix
Copy link

fourstix commented Sep 1, 2024

Are you in the US in one of the states that passed an age verification law? I had to set up a VPN to get the AEBN and other agents to work for me.

The details are in this discussion item.
#300

@JPH71
Copy link

JPH71 commented Sep 1, 2024

Just looking at this and its because AEBN has implemented an age verification step that effs eveything up.
As per discussion #300 is there anyone who has done this for Windows? I am rather clueless when it comes to VPNs

In regards to this age verification block, I am trying to set cookies that would fool the page and allow one to process as if age verification had been accepted.... no luck yet.....

@fourstix
Copy link

fourstix commented Sep 2, 2024

If it's easier to code and maintain, most of the sites with age verification will accept a userid / password. I would be okay with having the agent log in to the site with useird/ password parameters one supplies in the agent configuration. (Then it would be a legit session request to the site, rather than a hack.)

@joca879
Copy link
Author

joca879 commented Sep 2, 2024

Are you in the US in one of the states that passed an age verification law? I had to set up a VPN to get the AEBN and other agents to work for me.

The details are in this discussion item. #300

I'm not in the US. The other agents work fine

@joca879
Copy link
Author

joca879 commented Sep 2, 2024

Just looking at this and its because AEBN has implemented an age verification step that effs eveything up. As per discussion #300 is there anyone who has done this for Windows? I am rather clueless when it comes to VPNs

In regards to this age verification block, I am trying to set cookies that would fool the page and allow one to process as if age verification had been accepted.... no luck yet.....

Yes, in the last days I noticed that when trying to enter AEBN it pops up a age verification form... damn it... :(

@JPH71
Copy link

JPH71 commented Sep 2, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants