FunctionGraphMorph is defined twice in two files.

[Kirtai]

Both of the following files define FunctionGraphMorph.

Morphic-Widgets-Extras.pck.st
&
Examples-Morphic.pck.st

It would be neater and prevent version skew to have it in only one file.

[KenDickey]

The Morphic README.md states that Morphic-Widgets-Extras is depricated.

Perhaps we need to revisit the idea of having an internal package marker for depricated packages (as with provide & require).

The package preflight check could pop-up a query indicating "the package _whateveris depricated, do you really want to use this?"

[KenDickey]

If the change is made to have a #depricated mark, perhaps we should also create a #prerelease mark with the same behavior.

I.e. in the preflight, the code would check first if a package is OK to load in the current sense (do the version check), then if either #depricated or #prerelease, then the user can select OK or Skip (keep looking for a package which satisfies the requirement or fail).

[Kirtai]

Ah, I see. I was just searching for a plotting morph and saw it come up in both files.

Yes, a #deprecated flag or something to mark a package as not to be used or as obsolete could be useful.