You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
Since POP has been removed in cesm3 -- it's nonsensical that our testing is done with the POP land/ocean mask rather than the MOM t232 land/ocean mask. In. the past it was also seen as important to run our standalone simulations with the same land/ocean mask and or grid used in coupled simulations. I'm concerned that by running all of our testing and standalone simulations with the POP mask that we will miss important problems in the fully coupled simulations that now are ONLY using the MOM t232 land/ocean mask. Anything we can do to make our testing closer to the fully coupled simulations being done is a good idea in my mind.
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
Since POP has been removed in cesm3 -- it's nonsensical that our testing is done with the POP land/ocean mask rather than the MOM t232 land/ocean mask. In. the past it was also seen as important to run our standalone simulations with the same land/ocean mask and or grid used in coupled simulations. I'm concerned that by running all of our testing and standalone simulations with the POP mask that we will miss important problems in the fully coupled simulations that now are ONLY using the MOM t232 land/ocean mask. Anything we can do to make our testing closer to the fully coupled simulations being done is a good idea in my mind.
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
@cacraigucar @nusbaume @peverwhee
Will this change (regression test) answers?
No
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
Any CAM SE can do this
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: