why was it dmca'd again?

[radmanplays]

No description provided.

[OtterCodes101]

"Their code goes against our EULA and Terms of Use by bypassing server-based authentication and changing memory state on the client to simulate a successful sign in without actually performing any form of authentication or license check with the authentication server."

^

[radmanplays]

reasons why you should submit a counter dmca notice:

1. there already exist cracked minecraft launchers like tlauncher etc... that can join servers without authentication
2. the client is NOT simulating a successful sign in without authentication its just the "online-mode" in server.properties set to false
3. no copyrighted assets by mojnag/microsoft are used in eagler reborn
4. compiling eagler reborn is equivalent to compiling forge/fabric bc it decompiles and patches of the licensed minecraft client jar without distributing/sharing any code in the repo

[OtterCodes101]

reasons why you should submit a counter dmca notice:

1. there already exist cracked minecraft launchers like tlauncher etc... that can join servers without authentication
2. the client is NOT simulating a successful sign in without authentication its just the "online-mode" in server.properties set to false
3. no copyrighted assets by mojnag/microsoft are used in eagler reborn
4. compiling eagler reborn is equivalent to compiling forge/fabric bc it decompiles and patches of the licensed minecraft client jar without distributing/sharing any code in the repo

i'm gonna see if eagler ce can successfully counter notice first

[radmanplays]

@OtterCodes102 this is what the admins of eaglercraft's discord said about eagler ce:

[ZXMushroom63]

Eaglercraft's buildtools are also potentially against copyright law. From the GitHub Guide to Submitting a Counter Notice: Copyright laws are complicated and can lead to some unexpected results. In some cases a takedown notice might allege that your source code infringes because of what it can do after it is compiled and run.

[radmanplays]

Eaglercraft's buildtools are also potentially against copyright law. From the GitHub Guide to Submitting a Counter Notice: Copyright laws are complicated and can lead to some unexpected results. In some cases a takedown notice might allege that your source code infringes because of what it can do after it is compiled and run.

but forge patches minecraft's source code too. how is it not dmca'd?

[grandpa1946]

maybe this could be helpful
https://github.com/lax1dude/eagl3rxbungee-memory-leak-patch#security-patch-108-provided-in-good-faith-for-potentially-dangerous-gateway-memleaks
see the EULA Disclaimer part