Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Item system is dated #255

Open
LadyCailinBot opened this issue May 9, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Item system is dated #255

LadyCailinBot opened this issue May 9, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@LadyCailinBot
Copy link

CMDBOOK-2388 - Reported by Dark_Arc

Currently CommandBook's item system is very dated and supports only basic operations. The goal of this bugs is to track the progress of updating this system.

The current concept I am planning involves the support of this new functionality through a new component dedicated to item management and resolution.

This new component must enable support for as many elements of items in vanilla minecraft as possible under the bukkit API, and also allow external mods to add in their own "custom" items which they can define specific build instructions for based on a name based item matching system.

@LadyCailinBot
Copy link
Author

Comment by Kainzo

It would be best if we could directly add NBT tags using this system - but in the end vanilla commands "minecraft:give" already have this ability (although extremely hard to use :p)

@LadyCailinBot
Copy link
Author

Comment by Dark_Arc

Ah yes, I almost forgot that bukkit added a method which allows you to add NBT using vanilla syntax. I suppose I could add support for enabling a new syntax, or sticking with vanilla item syntax in the new system. That could be interesting.

@LadyCailinBot
Copy link
Author

Comment by Kainzo

When did they add the system for adding NBT ?

@LadyCailinBot
Copy link
Author

Comment by Dark_Arc

Bukkit/CraftBukkit@169af45
It's messy to use, but it is there.

@LadyCailinBot
Copy link
Author

Comment by hockeymikey

Any updates for this? Even NBT using vanilla syntax would be great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant