We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(As mentioned in #4): how can the JERM Ontology's ISA relations be aligned with the official http://isa-tools.github.io/linkedISA/ ?
Somehow their http://purl.org/isaterms is broken - but they are also at https://github.com/ISA-tools/linkedISA-ontologies
I was looking at Alejandra's https://doi.org/10.5524/100148 which has code like:
<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://w3id.org/isa/soapdenovo2/investigation/2"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000011"/> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/isaterms/investigation"/> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Activity"/> <rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">SOAPdenovo2</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">http://w3id.org/isa/soapdenovo2/investigation/2</rdfs:comment> </owl:NamedIndividual> <owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://w3id.org/isa/soapdenovo2/study/3"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0000066"/> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/isaterms/study"/> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Activity"/> <rdfs:label rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">SOAPdenovo2</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Experimental Metadata Licence: http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Study Funding Agency: State Key Development Program for Ba sic Research of China-973 Program</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Study Grant Number: 2011CB809203</rdfs:comment> <rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">http://w3id.org/isa/soapdenovo2/study/3</rdfs:comment> <obo:BFO_0000050 rdf:resource="http://w3id.org/isa/soapdenovo2/investigation/2"/> </owl:NamedIndividual>
so presumably our http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#hasPart is equivalent (or sub property) of the generic http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000050 ("part of") and types like http://purl.org/isaterms/study and http://purl.org/isaterms/investigation (notice lowercase for some reason) are (somewhat) equivalent to our http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#Study and http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#Investigation
But I don't find any http://purl.org/isaterms mapping in https://github.com/FAIRdom/JERMOntology/blob/master/JERM.owl
Would a direct mapping be feasible - or is the linkedISA structure more complicated than the view we have in JERM?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
btw.. forget about BFO_0000050 - LinkedISA has it's own has_part
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
(As mentioned in #4): how can the JERM Ontology's ISA relations be aligned with the official http://isa-tools.github.io/linkedISA/ ?
Somehow their http://purl.org/isaterms is broken - but they are also at https://github.com/ISA-tools/linkedISA-ontologies
I was looking at Alejandra's https://doi.org/10.5524/100148 which has code like:
so presumably our http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#hasPart is equivalent (or sub property) of the generic http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000050 ("part of") and types like http://purl.org/isaterms/study and http://purl.org/isaterms/investigation (notice lowercase for some reason) are (somewhat) equivalent to our http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#Study and http://jermontology.org/ontology/JERMOntology#Investigation
But I don't find any http://purl.org/isaterms mapping in https://github.com/FAIRdom/JERMOntology/blob/master/JERM.owl
Would a direct mapping be feasible - or is the linkedISA structure more complicated than the view we have in JERM?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: