Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Data duplication in the ERTelescopeTrack #84

Open
kozlovmy opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Data duplication in the ERTelescopeTrack #84

kozlovmy opened this issue Feb 11, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@kozlovmy
Copy link
Collaborator

The parameters https://github.com/FLNR-JINR/er/blob/dev/telescope/data/ERTelescopeTrack.h#L28

   ** @param fXStationVertex - Track vertex on telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
   ** @param fYStationVertex - Track vertex on telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;
   ** @param fXStationLocalVertex - Track vertex in station CS on telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
   ** @param fYStationLocalVertex - Track vertex in station CS on telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;
   ** @param fXChannel - Channel number in telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
   ** @param fYChannel - Channel number in telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;
   ** @param fXEdep - Edep in telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
   ** @param fYEdep - Edep in telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;

Parameters like fXStationVertex and fYStationVertex, fXChannel and fYChannel are seemed to be duplication of the same data in the heavyweight TVector3 objects. We can significantly reduce the size of the output tree by a union them to a single structure. Or do they have special meaning?

Vitaliy:

fXStationVertex and fYStationVertex are TVector objects, yes. These are geometrical vertexes of track. But fXChannel and fYChannel are integers. These are channel numbers. What exactly do you suggest to union?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants