You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
** @param fXStationVertex - Track vertex on telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
** @param fYStationVertex - Track vertex on telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;
** @param fXStationLocalVertex - Track vertex in station CS on telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
** @param fYStationLocalVertex - Track vertex in station CS on telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;
** @param fXChannel - Channel number in telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
** @param fYChannel - Channel number in telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;
** @param fXEdep - Edep in telescope station, which produced X coordinate;
** @param fYEdep - Edep in telescope station, which produced Y coordinate;
Parameters like fXStationVertex and fYStationVertex, fXChannel and fYChannel are seemed to be duplication of the same data in the heavyweight TVector3 objects. We can significantly reduce the size of the output tree by a union them to a single structure. Or do they have special meaning?
Vitaliy:
fXStationVertex and fYStationVertex are TVector objects, yes. These are geometrical vertexes of track. But fXChannel and fYChannel are integers. These are channel numbers. What exactly do you suggest to union?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The parameters https://github.com/FLNR-JINR/er/blob/dev/telescope/data/ERTelescopeTrack.h#L28
Parameters like
fXStationVertex
andfYStationVertex
,fXChannel
andfYChannel
are seemed to be duplication of the same data in the heavyweight TVector3 objects. We can significantly reduce the size of the output tree by a union them to a single structure. Or do they have special meaning?Vitaliy:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: