Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid rescanning of areas already cached #3

Open
wala0003 opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Avoid rescanning of areas already cached #3

wala0003 opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@wala0003
Copy link

I would think that server load would decrease if users could see where other users have recently scanned. There could be a few ways to do this but I think the easiest would be to adjust the way filtered pokemon are hidden on the map. I would guess most users end up heavily filtering their map to remove the common pokemon.

In my brief test, setting the hidden class to an opacity of 0.4 and then hiding the remainingtext completely for filtered pokemon gave good results.

capture

@FastPokeMapDev
Copy link
Owner

I like this idea, i'll tinker with this but the thing with this is opacity is extremely CPU intensive on mobile.

@wala0003
Copy link
Author

wala0003 commented Sep 16, 2016

Let the user set the opacity or use a second set of alpha-blended images?

@chrisi51
Copy link
Contributor

would it be a way to draw the scanned circles with a little opacity ... giving them a timout of lets say 5 minutes until they disappear ... they you know where something was scanned little time ago.

@waryas
Copy link

waryas commented Sep 17, 2016

Mmm, I'll start working on a draft.

@wala0003
Copy link
Author

wala0003 commented Oct 3, 2016

Still hoping to see if this could be implemented. Used to be easy to adjust for my own scans using the dev tools but no more.

@wala0003
Copy link
Author

wala0003 commented Oct 3, 2016

Zoomed out it really does make it easier to see where others haven't scanned recently and the unfiltered ones stand out.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants