Inventory - Asset Administrator and Asset Owner

[Rene2mt]

Constraint Task

Consistent with issue #813, for high impact systems, this constraint focuses on ensuring all inventory items have at least one asset owner or asset administrator.

Intended Outcome

• For HIGH-impact systems, every inventory-item MUST identify an asset-owner or administrator property either within the inventory-item itself, or within the component linked by the inventory-item.

NOTE - This information is preferred, but optional for Moderate, Low and LI-SaaS impact level systems.

Syntax Type

This is required core OSCAL syntax.

Allowed Values

There are no relevant allowed values.

Metapath(s) to Content

"context=""//inventory-item[../../system-characteristics/security-sensitivity-level/text()='fips-199-high']""

target=""./
(./responsible-party | //component[@uuid=./implemented-component/@component-uuid]/responsible-role)[@role-id=('asset-owner', 'asset-administrator')]""

count(party[@uuid=./party-uuid]) >= 1"

Purpose of the OSCAL Content

No response

Dependencies

No response

Acceptance Criteria

• All OSCAL adoption content affected by the change in this issue have been updated in accordance with the Documentation Standards.
  • Explanation is present and accurate
  • sample content is present and accurate
  • Metapath is present, accurate, and does not throw a syntax exception using oscal-cli metaschema metapath eval -e "expression".
• All constraints associated with the review task have been created
• The appropriate example OSCAL file is updated with content that demonstrates the FedRAMP-compliant OSCAL presentation.
• The constraint conforms to the FedRAMP Constraint Style Guide.
  • All automated and manual review items that identify non-conformance are addressed; or technical leads (David Waltermire; AJ Stein) have approved the PR and “override” the style guide requirement.
• Known good test content is created for unit testing.
• Known bad test content is created for unit testing.
• Unit testing is configured to run both known good and known bad test content examples.
• Passing and failing unit tests, and corresponding test vectors in the form of known valid and invalid OSCAL test files, are created or updated for each constraint.
• A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals section of the User Story in the issue.
• This issue is referenced in the PR.

Other information

No response