Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update attachment-type allowed values #1091

Open
14 tasks done
brian-ruf opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1095
Open
14 tasks done

Update attachment-type allowed values #1091

brian-ruf opened this issue Jan 10, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1095

Comments

@brian-ruf
Copy link
Contributor

brian-ruf commented Jan 10, 2025

Constraint Task

The existing attachment-type constraint containing the list of FedRAMP-accepted allowed values for the FedRAMP extension resource types (//resource/prop[@name='type' and @ns='http://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal']/@value) needs to be expanded to include the values described below.

Intended Outcome

Allow all resources types necessary to model FedRAMP-recognized resources.

Syntax Type

This is required core OSCAL syntax.

Allowed Values

There are no relevant allowed values.

Metapath(s) to Content

<enum value="fedramp-poam">A Plan of Action and Milestones represented either using the FedRAMP template or FedRAMP-compliant OSCAL.</enum>

Purpose of the OSCAL Content

No response

Dependencies

No response

Acceptance Criteria

  • All OSCAL adoption content affected by the change in this issue have been updated in accordance with the Documentation Standards.
    • Explanation is present and accurate
    • sample content is present and accurate
    • Metapath is present, accurate, and does not throw a syntax exception using oscal-cli metaschema metapath eval -e "expression".
  • All constraints associated with the review task have been created
  • The appropriate example OSCAL file is updated with content that demonstrates the FedRAMP-compliant OSCAL presentation.
  • The constraint conforms to the FedRAMP Constraint Style Guide.
    • All automated and manual review items that identify non-conformance are addressed; or technical leads (David Waltermire; AJ Stein) have approved the PR and “override” the style guide requirement.
  • Known good test content is created for unit testing.
  • Known bad test content is created for unit testing.
  • Unit testing is configured to run both known good and known bad test content examples.
  • Passing and failing unit tests, and corresponding test vectors in the form of known valid and invalid OSCAL test files, are created or updated for each constraint.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals section of the User Story in the issue.
  • This issue is referenced in the PR.

Other information

No response

@brian-ruf brian-ruf added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 10, 2025
@brian-ruf brian-ruf moved this from 🆕 New to 🔖 Ready in FedRAMP Automation Jan 13, 2025
@brian-ruf brian-ruf moved this from 🔖 Ready to 🆕 New in FedRAMP Automation Jan 13, 2025
@brian-ruf brian-ruf moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in FedRAMP Automation Jan 13, 2025
@brian-ruf brian-ruf moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🔖 Ready in FedRAMP Automation Jan 13, 2025
@Gabeblis Gabeblis self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
@Gabeblis Gabeblis moved this from 🔖 Ready to 🏗 In progress in FedRAMP Automation Jan 13, 2025
@Gabeblis Gabeblis linked a pull request Jan 13, 2025 that will close this issue
6 tasks
@Gabeblis Gabeblis moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in FedRAMP Automation Jan 13, 2025
@Gabeblis Gabeblis moved this from 👀 In review to 🚢 Ready to Ship in FedRAMP Automation Jan 14, 2025
@Gabeblis Gabeblis moved this from 🚢 Ready to Ship to 👀 In review in FedRAMP Automation Jan 14, 2025
@Gabeblis Gabeblis moved this from 👀 In review to 🚢 Ready to Ship in FedRAMP Automation Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🚢 Ready to Ship
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants