Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Space Mining Module Parallel seems to be bugged #15863

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
noobyaran9 opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Space Mining Module Parallel seems to be bugged #15863

noobyaran9 opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Bug: Minor Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed

Comments

@noobyaran9
Copy link

noobyaran9 commented Mar 29, 2024

Your GTNH Discord Username

ipielover

Your Pack Version

2.5.1

Your Server

Delta

Java Version

Java 8

Type of Server

Thermos

Your Expectation

Space Mining Module parallel should be limited to the number of parallel stated in the description.

The Reality

I'm using this recipe for output calculation:
image
This is a mining module configured to 8 parallel:

Power usage: 425,672 EU/t = 53,209 * 8
image
I've ran 3 cycle of the mentioned recipe and here are the outputs:
image
image
image

After changing the parallel config to 80:

Power usage: 2,234,778 EU/t = 53,209 * 42(?)
image
The same 3 cycle output:
image
image
image

Based on the power usage calculation and the output count, it seems to be applying the 42 parallels with the output being 5x of the 8 parallels config.
I might be limited by the computation that I provide so it only handles upto 42 parallels.

Your Proposal

Can anyone check if this is suppose to be the expected behaviour?

Final Checklist

  • I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying the bug still exists will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
  • I can reproduce this problem consistently by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
  • I have asked other people and they confirm they also have this problem by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
@noobyaran9 noobyaran9 added Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed Bug: Minor labels Mar 29, 2024
@NotAPenguin0
Copy link
Contributor

NotAPenguin0 commented Mar 29, 2024

A far as I know, each parallel needs computation separately, if you don't provide 8x computation you won't get 8x parallel output.

@GTNH-Afx237v7
Copy link
Contributor

Just for clarity: are we talking about 8x or 80x parallel?

@noobyaran9
Copy link
Author

noobyaran9 commented Mar 29, 2024

Just for clarity: are we talking about 8x or 80x parallel?

Anything more than 8x parallel shouldn't be doable.
From the tooltip, it should only do upto 8 parallel for MK-II

@Georggi
Copy link
Contributor

Georggi commented Jul 18, 2024

Still reproduceable in 2.6.1.

@kstvr32
Copy link

kstvr32 commented Sep 5, 2024

This should be closed. Was fixed by GTNewHorizons/GTNH-Intergalactic#67

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug: Minor Status: Triage Issue awaiting triage. Remove once this issue is processed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants