You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Space Mining Module parallel should be limited to the number of parallel stated in the description.
The Reality
I'm using this recipe for output calculation:
This is a mining module configured to 8 parallel:
Power usage: 425,672 EU/t = 53,209 * 8
I've ran 3 cycle of the mentioned recipe and here are the outputs:
After changing the parallel config to 80:
Power usage: 2,234,778 EU/t = 53,209 * 42(?)
The same 3 cycle output:
Based on the power usage calculation and the output count, it seems to be applying the 42 parallels with the output being 5x of the 8 parallels config.
I might be limited by the computation that I provide so it only handles upto 42 parallels.
Your Proposal
Can anyone check if this is suppose to be the expected behaviour?
Final Checklist
I have searched this issue tracker and there is nothing similar already. Posting on a closed issue saying the bug still exists will prompt us to investigate and reopen it once we confirm your report.
I can reproduce this problem consistently by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
I have asked other people and they confirm they also have this problem by follow the exact steps I described above, or this does not need reproducing, e.g. recipe loophole.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your GTNH Discord Username
ipielover
Your Pack Version
2.5.1
Your Server
Delta
Java Version
Java 8
Type of Server
Thermos
Your Expectation
Space Mining Module parallel should be limited to the number of parallel stated in the description.
The Reality
I'm using this recipe for output calculation:
This is a mining module configured to 8 parallel:
Power usage: 425,672 EU/t = 53,209 * 8
I've ran 3 cycle of the mentioned recipe and here are the outputs:
After changing the parallel config to 80:
Power usage: 2,234,778 EU/t = 53,209 * 42(?)
The same 3 cycle output:
Based on the power usage calculation and the output count, it seems to be applying the 42 parallels with the output being 5x of the 8 parallels config.
I might be limited by the computation that I provide so it only handles upto 42 parallels.
Your Proposal
Can anyone check if this is suppose to be the expected behaviour?
Final Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: