Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about self.id_bank and encoder_hidden_states #170

Open
jiashenggu opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Question about self.id_bank and encoder_hidden_states #170

jiashenggu opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jiashenggu
Copy link

I'd like to know why the implementation looks like this

        if write:
            self.id_bank[cur_step] = [
                hidden_states[: self.id_length],
                hidden_states[self.id_length :],
            ]
        else:
            encoder_hidden_states = torch.cat(
                (
                    self.id_bank[cur_step][0].to(self.device),
                    hidden_states[:1],
                    self.id_bank[cur_step][1].to(self.device),
                    hidden_states[1:],
                )
            )

Why not code like this?

        if write:
            self.id_bank[cur_step] = hidden_states
        else:
            encoder_hidden_states = torch.cat(
                (
                    self.id_bank[cur_step].to(self.device),
                    hidden_states,
                )
            )
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant