-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use of the term "bioenergy" in variable names #213
Comments
Thank you @kriegler100, pinging @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-emissions and @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-land for comment |
Generally when discussing the source of carbon, I would use the term "Biogenic" as opposed to fossil, etc. So if I had to pick between "Biomass" and "Bioenergy", the closest to that is "Biomass". But still less precise.. |
Agree it should be Biomass. I haven't found "Bioenergy" anywhere else, and would also stick with one consistent term |
Implement in #208 for carbon removal and carbon capture. There is still use of "Bioenergy" in "Agricultural Demand|Crops|Bioenergy" - should that also be revised? |
Hm, good question. At the risk of contradicting my earlier comment, I think there it is actually adequate |
Agree with Jessica. Here it is about bioenergy crops. Food crops are also biomass, so "biomass" would not work here. |
I also agree with @strefler that |
Harmonized in carbon management variables via #208, keeping as is for bioenergy crops. |
Is there an inconsistency between using "biomass" and "bioenergy" in variable names?
Example: Carbon Removal|Geological Storage|Bioenergy
Why not: Carbon Removal|Geological Storage|Biomass?
Compare: Primary Energy|Biomass|w/ CCS
Or is there a systematic rule when to use bioenergy and when biomass? If not I suggest to use Biomass consistently.
@volker-krey
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: