Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Video oral history with additional audio-only derivative #64

Open
jronallo opened this issue Feb 19, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Video oral history with additional audio-only derivative #64

jronallo opened this issue Feb 19, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@jronallo
Copy link
Contributor

Description

I have video oral histories. I would like to let a client know that an audio-only derivative is available that could be played or downloaded instead of the talking head video.

Variation(s)

Are there other cases where the audio content of a video is more important or primary compared to the video content? I could see video of radio shows being similar.

Proposed Solutions

This could be listed as another choice along with any versions of the video or broken out into a separate choice or annotation. What's the best pattern for making it clear that the audio is equivalent to what is found in the video?

Additional Background

This is related to work I'm doing to process video oral histories: jronallo/abrizer#4

@zimeon zimeon changed the title use case: video oral history with additional audio-only derivative Video oral history with additional audio-only derivative Feb 20, 2017
@zimeon
Copy link
Member

zimeon commented Feb 20, 2017

Nice use case for that seems to be a pretty close match for the pattern in https://github.com/IIIF/iiif-av/blob/master/source/api/av/examples/9.json . We'll probably need to put a bit of thought to enumerating the possible user experiences: both audios play, one auto-muted but offered as option etc.

@jronallo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, in my case the separate audio file should not be played at the same time as the video which will include its own audio. Also it would be nice to say that this isn't some other audio but the audio that is extracted from the video. There's an equivalence of content there that I'm not seeing in example 9. That example seems to be saying that those should both play at the same time, but the separate audio could be a different audio track than the video has.

@azaroth42
Copy link
Member

You would also want viewingHint of none, per 11b to say that the audio should not be played by default.

@counterintuit
Copy link

Perhaps I'm off the mark but as one behavior I can imagine a video as the master clock with multiple sound tracks available to audition that are also clocked to the video and selectable by use of "radio buttons" or "solo buttons". Conversely, an audio stream could be the master with multiple video streams selectable. The original "time-of-day" is one form of timecode synchronization used among multiple recording devices--as opposed to some arbitrarily chosen master timecode value. Multiple streams and their relationships in time are a huge part of AV production and could have historical implications. Apologies if this is addressed elsewhere.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants