Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.69-inch capacitive screen recommendation #1432

Closed
modi12jin opened this issue Nov 13, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

1.69-inch capacitive screen recommendation #1432

modi12jin opened this issue Nov 13, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@modi12jin
Copy link

modi12jin commented Nov 13, 2022

tb_image_share_1667995100639

Official Website: www.polcd.com
Alibaba International Station Store: https://polcd.en.alibaba.com/

Recommended reason:
Screen size 1.69 inches
Resolution 280*240
Screen: ST7789V (SPI)
Capacitive touch CST816T (I2C)
Touch and screen share one FPC
Good quality and cheap, if you are in China it's worth 24 rmb(Around $3.4)

@modi12jin modi12jin changed the title 1.69 inch screen capacitive touch screen recommendation 1.69-inch capacitive screen recommendation Nov 13, 2022
@modi12jin
Copy link
Author

modi12jin commented Nov 13, 2022

Use this screen video

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2TOVohmUqOE&t=5s

【(ESP32桌面开台)gsm-weather-esp32s3版本-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/nX1Yxkk

【【DIY】小电视,但是触摸屏~-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/UXq5onW

【触屏版本的ESP32S3-XTrack-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/LiEgyIp

@modi12jin
Copy link
Author

About touch drive, maybe this question can help you guys
fbiego/CST816S#1

@Avamander
Copy link
Collaborator

Hardware design of the PineTime is not really up to the InfiniTime project to decide upon. Feature and enhancement requests have currently been written down on the Pine64 Wiki article called "PineTime Hardware Wishlist."

@Avamander Avamander closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Nov 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants