Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow filtering by company ID only #855

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

twyatt
Copy link
Member

@twyatt twyatt commented Feb 6, 2025

Closes #854

Updated scan filtering documentation, rendered markdown here.

@twyatt twyatt added this to the 0.36.0 milestone Feb 6, 2025
@twyatt twyatt added the patch Changes that should bump the PATCH version number label Feb 6, 2025
@twyatt twyatt changed the title Fix filtering by only company ID Allow filtering by company ID only Feb 6, 2025
@twyatt twyatt marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 04:00
@twyatt twyatt requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2025 04:00
@@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ public sealed class Filter {
*/
public val id: Int,

public val data: ByteArray,
/** Must be non-`null` if [dataMask] is non-`null`. */
Copy link
Contributor

@Phoenix7351 Phoenix7351 Feb 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. Gonna check to make sure Topaz's decode covers this.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wasn't covered. Will add.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have this for serviceData too?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kable doesn't (yet) support service data filtering. 🙈
When I do get around to implementing it, then yes, it looks like it would need similar treatment.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created #857 to track.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
patch Changes that should bump the PATCH version number
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Filtering on companyIdentifier does not work
3 participants