Replies: 2 comments
-
fastq is the reads file. I assume your question is on **.GFA vs .FASTG:
The *.fastg will likely contain more unrelated contigs (False positive hits) because it was generated purely using blast and EM GMM contig clustering and because GetOrganelle was designed to be precautious in removing suspicious contigs in this stage. The generation of *.gfa involves more consideration, including label weighting and path searching, which should be more precise. But the mt-pt similarity/transfers can still largely hamper the precision of mt graph recognition, for which reason some pt contigs were not able to be removed from the mt graph in the *.gfa file. In general, *.gfa file can be organelle-complete and very reliable only when the log file indicates a complete result. Being a more cautious and more informative graph version that contains potential contaminations and interferences, the *.fastg file will be useful for troubleshooting. The *.gfa file is useless in trouble but used for quick confirmation only when the result is already complete. References |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for your answer. My question is solved. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My question: Is there any difference between ().gfa and ().fastq?
Originally posted by @zgszm in #122 (comment)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions