You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When /arain (ع) is added to a font its positional forms come without their Unicode.
ع arain U+0639 (Unicode definition: ARABIC LETTER AIN)
arain.init Unicode is missing
arain.medi Unicode is missing
arain.fina Unicode is missing
However, there is another set of /ain that has their Unicode in GB's list.
ﻉ ain.isol U+0FEC9 (ARABIC LETTER AIN ISOLATED FORM)
ﻋ ain.init U+0FECA (ARABIC LETTER AIN INITIAL FORM)
ﻌ ain.medi U+0FECB (ARABIC LETTER AIN MEDIAL FORM)
ﻊ ain.fina U+0FECC (ARABIC LETTER AIN FINAL FORM)
I think either arain should be renamed as ain and the suffixed ones [arain.init/medi/fina] should be removed from the list.
Or [ain.isol/init/medi/fina] should be renamed as arain and merged with existing ones.
Since the other Arabic letters don't start with ar first option sounds more convenient to me.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Arabc AIN has a conflict with "LATIN LETTER AIN" from Phonetic Extensions. This causes the Arabic AIN to get a prefix and then it loses its connection with the positional forms.
This forces a script prefix on the AIN from Phonetic Extensions, as less depends on that name. As far as I can tell.
When /arain (ع) is added to a font its positional forms come without their Unicode.
However, there is another set of /ain that has their Unicode in GB's list.
I think either
arain
should be renamed asain
and the suffixed ones[arain.init/medi/fina]
should be removed from the list.Or
[ain.isol/init/medi/fina]
should be renamed asarain
and merged with existing ones.Since the other Arabic letters don't start with
ar
first option sounds more convenient to me.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: