Functionary 3.1 template for Ollama

[fuadarradhi]

Currently ollama has a llama 3.1 model with tools.

if the functionary base is from llama 3.1, is it safe to use the template from meta/llama3.1? or is there anything that needs to be fixed in this template so that the functional works properly?

https://ollama.com/library/llama3.1/blobs/948af2743fc7

{{- if or .System .Tools }}<|start_header_id|>system<|end_header_id|>
{{- if .System }}

{{ .System }}
{{- end }}
{{- if .Tools }}

Cutting Knowledge Date: December 2023

When you receive a tool call response, use the output to format an answer to the orginal user question.

You are a helpful assistant with tool calling capabilities.
{{- end }}<|eot_id|>
{{- end }}
{{- range $i, $_ := .Messages }}
{{- $last := eq (len (slice $.Messages $i)) 1 }}
{{- if eq .Role "user" }}<|start_header_id|>user<|end_header_id|>
{{- if and $.Tools $last }}

Given the following functions, please respond with a JSON for a function call with its proper arguments that best answers the given prompt.

Respond in the format {"name": function name, "parameters": dictionary of argument name and its value}. Do not use variables.

{{ range $.Tools }}
{{- . }}
{{ end }}
Question: {{ .Content }}<|eot_id|>
{{- else }}

{{ .Content }}<|eot_id|>
{{- end }}{{ if $last }}<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

{{ end }}
{{- else if eq .Role "assistant" }}<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>
{{- if .ToolCalls }}
{{ range .ToolCalls }}
{"name": "{{ .Function.Name }}", "parameters": {{ .Function.Arguments }}}{{ end }}
{{- else }}

{{ .Content }}
{{- end }}{{ if not $last }}<|eot_id|>{{ end }}
{{- else if eq .Role "tool" }}<|start_header_id|>ipython<|end_header_id|>

{{ .Content }}<|eot_id|>{{ if $last }}<|start_header_id|>assistant<|end_header_id|>

{{ end }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}