You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the updates to the CPT suite, three arrays holding aerosol information are added to the Tbd DDT by EMC:
Tbd%in_nm(:,:) ! IN number concentration
Tbd%ccn_nm(:,:) ! CCN number concentration
Tbd%aer_nm(:,:) ! GOCART aerosol climo
These are used by Morrison-Gettelman microphysics at the moment, Tbd%aer_nm is mutually exclusive with Tbd%in_nm + Tbd%ccn_nm. On the other hand, we have Statein%qgrs(:,:,ntwa) and Statein%qgrs(:,:,ntia) (and corresponding Stateout%gq0(:,:,ntwa) and Stateout%gq0(:,:,nita)) that are used by the aerosol-aware Thompson microphysics scheme, reading in its own version of the aerosol climatology. Thompson also uses the Coupling%nwfa2d(:) and Coupling%nifa2d(:) arrays to hold surface emission rates for the two species.
Questions to be answered:
Are the values in EMC's aerosol climatology from the same source as those used by Thompson MP?
If the values derived from the climatology and used by the MP schemes compatible?
Can we use the same arrays for both Thompson and MG at least? How does MG use the Statein and Stateout arrays?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
…led model (NOAA-EMC#254)
* Implements a bugfix for the mapping of ifrac for both nems_orig and nems_frac in CMEPS: issue (NCAR#17)[NOAA-EMC/CMEPS#17]
* Adds field-packing for performance improvements in CMEPS: issue (NCAR#23)[NOAA-EMC/CMEPS#23]
* Uses module file fv3_debug when DEBUG=Y is specified and fv3_debug is available
* Shortens the nems.configure file name used with the coupled model
Originally raised as https://github.com/NCAR/FV3/issues/99:
With the updates to the CPT suite, three arrays holding aerosol information are added to the Tbd DDT by EMC:
Tbd%in_nm(:,:) ! IN number concentration
Tbd%ccn_nm(:,:) ! CCN number concentration
Tbd%aer_nm(:,:) ! GOCART aerosol climo
These are used by Morrison-Gettelman microphysics at the moment, Tbd%aer_nm is mutually exclusive with Tbd%in_nm + Tbd%ccn_nm. On the other hand, we have Statein%qgrs(:,:,ntwa) and Statein%qgrs(:,:,ntia) (and corresponding Stateout%gq0(:,:,ntwa) and Stateout%gq0(:,:,nita)) that are used by the aerosol-aware Thompson microphysics scheme, reading in its own version of the aerosol climatology. Thompson also uses the Coupling%nwfa2d(:) and Coupling%nifa2d(:) arrays to hold surface emission rates for the two species.
Questions to be answered:
Are the values in EMC's aerosol climatology from the same source as those used by Thompson MP?
If the values derived from the climatology and used by the MP schemes compatible?
Can we use the same arrays for both Thompson and MG at least? How does MG use the Statein and Stateout arrays?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: