-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Obtain Re-Indexing Benchmark from Metacat 2.19 #2043
Comments
Nick created a temporary clone of the mn-demo-6 VM for benchmarking, and set it up with 32 cores and 125GB RAM, to mimic the test.ADC metacat pod on the dev cluster. Its hostname is |
Copy of
|
dev clusterCopied same data files and DB to dev cluster/ceph (32 processors, 125Gi), 35932 objects First run: 12/19/24Queue population and consumption:
Entire Reindex(?) NOTE: assumes last log entry (an
|
Benchmark Summary[see note 1] FIRST BENCHMARK:Metacat 2.19.1 (vm), 1 index worker (12/18/24):
Metacat 3.1.0 (k8s), 50 index workers (12/19/24):
NOTES:
SECOND BENCHMARK:Metacat 2.19.1 (vm), 1 index worker (12/20/24):
Metacat 3.1.0 (k8s), 50 index workers (12/20/24):
|
@jeanetteclark - when you get chance, please lmk if you have all the info you need, and whether I can close this issue |
Obtain Re-Indexing Benchmark from Metacat 2.19 to Compare With 3.1 for ADC NSF Site Visit
Already have benchmarks for reindexing 3.1.0 on k8s:
~2.7 objects/second
with 25 index workers~3.3 objects/second
with 50 index workersFor comparison PISCO reindex on Metacat 3.0.0, not in k8s (i.e. one index worker):
~0.2 objects/second
Possibilities for 2.19 benchmark:
knbvm
)brooke@knbvm:~$ nproc --all 8
brooke@mn-demo-6:~$ nproc --all 4
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: