Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
54 lines (33 loc) · 6.92 KB

extensions_debugger_api.md

File metadata and controls

54 lines (33 loc) · 6.92 KB

Extensions Debugger API Security Analysis

Component Focus

This document analyzes the security of the Chromium Extensions Debugger API, specifically focusing on the debugger API (chrome/browser/extensions/api/debugger/debugger_api.cc, tested in debugger_apitest.cc). This API provides extensions with powerful capabilities to debug web pages and other extensions, potentially creating significant security risks if not implemented correctly.

Potential Logic Flaws

  • Insufficient Input Validation: Improper validation of input parameters (e.g., target IDs, URLs, properties) could lead to various attacks, including injection vulnerabilities. While some validation is performed, particularly for URLs, further analysis is needed to ensure comprehensive input validation for all parameters.
  • Permission Bypass: Flaws in the permission system could allow extensions to access or modify debug targets beyond their granted permissions, leading to privilege escalation. Analysis is needed to ensure permissions are correctly checked and enforced for all API functions.
  • Race Conditions: Concurrent access to debug data from multiple extensions or browser processes could lead to data corruption or unexpected behavior. Analysis is needed to identify and mitigate potential race conditions.
  • Resource Leaks: Improper handling of resources (e.g., memory, file handles) during debugging operations could lead to instability or denial-of-service attacks. Analysis is needed to ensure proper resource management.
  • Cross-Origin Issues: The API's interaction with targets from different origins could introduce vulnerabilities if not handled carefully. Analysis is needed to ensure secure cross-origin interactions.
  • Incognito Mode Bypass: Vulnerabilities could allow extensions to access or manipulate incognito tabs without proper authorization. Analysis is needed to ensure incognito mode is handled securely.
  • API Misuse: The powerful features of the debugger API could be misused by malicious extensions to perform harmful actions. Analysis is needed to identify and mitigate potential misuse scenarios.
  • Debugger API Vulnerabilities: The debugger API, which allows extensions to debug web pages and other extensions, could be vulnerable to exploitation if not implemented securely. The tests in debugger_apitest.cc reveal potential areas of concern, such as cross-profile debugging and policy restrictions.

Further Analysis and Potential Issues

Debugger API

The debugger_api.cc file, tested by debugger_apitest.cc, implements the Chrome Extensions API for debugging. Key security considerations include:

  • Cross-Profile Debugging: The DebuggerGetTargetsFunction and DebuggerAttachFunction allow extensions to debug targets in different profiles, including incognito profiles. While restrictions are in place, further analysis is needed to ensure that cross-profile debugging does not introduce security vulnerabilities, such as unauthorized access to sensitive data in other profiles. The tests in CrossProfileDebuggerApiTest highlight the importance of verifying these restrictions.

  • Policy Restrictions: The TestDefaultPolicyBlockedHosts test in debugger_apitest.cc demonstrates that policy-blocked hosts supersede the debugger permission. This is a crucial security measure to prevent extensions from debugging restricted websites. However, further analysis is needed to ensure that these policy restrictions are consistently enforced and cannot be bypassed.

  • Infobars: The debugger API uses infobars to notify users when an extension is debugging a tab. The tests in DebuggerApiTest related to infobars (InfoBar, InfoBarIsRemovedAfterFiveSeconds, InfoBarIsNotRemovedWhenAnotherDebuggerAttached) should be reviewed to ensure that the infobar mechanism itself does not introduce any vulnerabilities, such as spoofing or denial-of-service attacks. The tests demonstrate that infobars are displayed and removed correctly in various scenarios, but further analysis is needed to ensure that the infobar mechanism is secure.

  • Attaching and Detaching: The RunAttachFunction and related tests in DebuggerApiTest cover various scenarios involving attaching and detaching from targets. These tests should be reviewed to ensure that the attach/detach mechanism is robust and does not introduce vulnerabilities, such as race conditions or resource leaks. The tests demonstrate that the attach/detach mechanism works correctly in most cases, but further analysis is needed to ensure robustness and security in all scenarios.

  • Restricted URLs: Tests like DebuggerNotAllowedOnRestrictedBlobUrls, DebuggerNotAllowedOnPolicyRestrictedBlobUrls, and DebuggerNotAllowedOnSecirutyInterstitials demonstrate restrictions on debugging certain URLs, including blob URLs, policy-restricted URLs, and security interstitials. These restrictions are important security measures, but further analysis is needed to ensure they cannot be bypassed.

  • Developer Mode Detection: The IsDeveloperModeTrueHistogram and IsDeveloperModeFalseHistogram tests check the logging of developer mode status. While not directly related to a vulnerability, this logging could be useful for detecting malicious extensions that try to enable developer mode without user consent.

Areas Requiring Further Investigation

  • Thoroughly analyze cross-profile debugging scenarios to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data.
  • Ensure consistent enforcement of policy restrictions to prevent debugging of restricted websites.
  • Review the infobar mechanism for vulnerabilities.
  • Analyze the attach/detach mechanism for robustness and security.
  • Ensure that restrictions on debugging specific URLs cannot be bypassed.

Secure Contexts and Extensions API

The Extensions API operates within the context of web pages, which can be either secure (HTTPS) or insecure (HTTP). Secure contexts provide additional security measures, such as preventing mixed content and enforcing stricter security policies. However, vulnerabilities in the Extensions API itself could still be exploited even within secure contexts. Therefore, robust input validation, secure error handling, and proper authorization checks are crucial for all API functions, regardless of the context.

Privacy Implications

The Extensions API can access and manipulate sensitive user data, such as browsing history, bookmarks, and passwords. Any vulnerabilities in the API could lead to privacy violations. Therefore, privacy-preserving design and implementation are essential.

Additional Notes

Further research is needed to identify specific CVEs related to the Extensions API and to assess the overall security posture of the extension system. The high VRP rewards associated with some API functions highlight the importance of thorough security analysis. Files reviewed: chrome/browser/extensions/api/debugger/debugger_apitest.cc.