Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Allow pP to be specified as a function of wind speed #686

Open
paulf81 opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement An improvement of an existing feature floris.simulation ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log.

Comments

@paulf81
Copy link
Collaborator

paulf81 commented Jul 19, 2023

Allow pP to be specified as a function of wind speed

Currently in FLORIS, pP controls the rate of power loss to yaw by specifying an exponent. In high wind speed, this reduction is automatically limited by converting to pW and effective wind speed. However, it assumed to be fixed across low wind speeds. However it could be useful to allow for pP to increase for example in lower wind speeds as observed in https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/6/1427/2021/

Proposed solution

Allow for pP to be specified as a list with an accompanying list of wind speeds. Challenge will be that users should take care not to double-count the effect of rated conditions on reducing apparent pP

Alternatives considered

The approaches being piloted in Pull Request #638 might accomplish this intrinsically?

@ejsimley and @Bartdoekemeijer curious what you think of this?

@paulf81 paulf81 added the enhancement An improvement of an existing feature label Jul 19, 2023
@Bartdoekemeijer
Copy link
Collaborator

I definitely like having more freedom to vary certain parameters. I do wonder whether this functionality may be better limited to the time_series=True, so that users can specify exact input parameters for:

  1. Air density
  2. Wind sheer
  3. Turbulence intensity
  4. pP

This way, you don't have to insert relationship tables inside of the FLORIS input file.

@paulf81
Copy link
Collaborator Author

paulf81 commented Jul 31, 2023

That would be a more flexible approach. To be honest now I'm not sure, I can imagine a few ways to implement this that have a set of pros and cons associated with each. Some list like:

  • Allow pP specified every time step
  • pP provided over a list of wind speeds
  • Formula for loss expanded to two coefficients to reflect yaw angle and wind speed dependency
  • See if Add MIT yaw correction method #638 handles this intrinsically

@rafmudaf rafmudaf added floris.simulation ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log. labels Nov 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An improvement of an existing feature floris.simulation ideas-list Ideas that would be nice to do but aren't scheduled. Lower priority than back-log.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants