Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should cublasLtHandle_t be Destroyed? #1372

Open
shenzhenghai opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1389
Open

Should cublasLtHandle_t be Destroyed? #1372

shenzhenghai opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1389
Assignees
@ptrendx

Comments

@shenzhenghai
Copy link

In cublas_gemm, it always create a new cublasLtHandle_t, but no corresponding handle destroy. It seems may cause memory or resource leak, any reason?
@shenzhenghai
Copy link
Author

@ptrendx @ksivaman
Hello, could you please help me with this question? Thanks.

@ptrendx ptrendx self-assigned this Jan 2, 2025
@ptrendx
Copy link
Member

ptrendx commented Jan 2, 2025

Huh, thanks for the good catch @shenzhenghai! I will prepare a PR to fix this.

@ptrendx ptrendx linked a pull request Jan 2, 2025 that will close this issue
Open
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ptrendx ptrendx

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Better cuBLAS handle management ptrendx/TransformerEngine
2 participants
@ptrendx @shenzhenghai