-
Hi, I am running running philosopher (3.3.11) with MSFragger and I am interested in peptides specifically, not proteins. I use a large custom database and I have a high number of runs to work on, therefore ProphetProphet is taking a very long time. I would like to skip it in order to only have the peptide.tsv and psm.tsv files (not interested in protein.tsv). For filter, I use the following flags --sequential --razor --tag DECOY_ --pepxml combined.pep.xml Would it be possible to use filter and report without having to run ProteinProphet? Thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi @nirkoty If you want to go ahead with your analysis without the protein inference, try removing the As an alternative to ProteinProphet, I added to Philosopher a custom algorithm that can apply a protein correction to the PSM list. The process is much faster, and it applies a logic very similar to the razor approach based on a ProteinProphet output. For that, you need to remove the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Felipe, Many thanks for the quick reply, it worked indeed! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @nirkoty
As you correctly pointed, if you are using a huge database, like a metaproteomics one, the standard protein inference approach might be feasible.
If you want to go ahead with your analysis without the protein inference, try removing the
--sequential
and--razor
tags from your command. Those flags trigger different functions that affect how the PSMs are processed and filtered together with the protein inference data; that is why you see the error message.As an alternative to ProteinProphet, I added to Philosopher a custom algorithm that can apply a protein correction to the PSM list. The process is much faster, and it applies a logic very similar to the razor approach based on…