Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs Review - Audience #42

Closed
Learmstrong opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Docs Review - Audience #42

Learmstrong opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Learmstrong
Copy link

I am assuming the “audience” we are writing to includes educators at the High School or University level, in addition to students at these respective levels? How much background with these technologies do we expect our audience to have?

(Some of the pain points I am noting related to code or explication might be specific to my lack of experience, and unnecessary for our particular audience.)

@JohnGriffiths
Copy link
Collaborator

JohnGriffiths commented Dec 3, 2020

It's a good question.

Really to properly address multiple audiences we will need multiple documentation sets, pitched at different levels.

It's probably a bit beyond the scope of the current docs to fully accommodate high school educators (we have actually done high school based projects with this tool; I know what's involved in that...)

But we certainly do motivated people with minimal computational background and minimal psychology+neuroscience knowledge to know what's going on. So there's lots of room for improvement with just that objective.

HTH.

@Learmstrong
Copy link
Author

Hi John -

Thanks so much for the feedback. I did my best to provide comments that might strengthen this objective in the docs review - now located on Issue 49. Appreciate you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants