You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am assuming the “audience” we are writing to includes educators at the High School or University level, in addition to students at these respective levels? How much background with these technologies do we expect our audience to have?
(Some of the pain points I am noting related to code or explication might be specific to my lack of experience, and unnecessary for our particular audience.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Really to properly address multiple audiences we will need multiple documentation sets, pitched at different levels.
It's probably a bit beyond the scope of the current docs to fully accommodate high school educators (we have actually done high school based projects with this tool; I know what's involved in that...)
But we certainly do motivated people with minimal computational background and minimal psychology+neuroscience knowledge to know what's going on. So there's lots of room for improvement with just that objective.
Thanks so much for the feedback. I did my best to provide comments that might strengthen this objective in the docs review - now located on Issue 49. Appreciate you!
I am assuming the “audience” we are writing to includes educators at the High School or University level, in addition to students at these respective levels? How much background with these technologies do we expect our audience to have?
(Some of the pain points I am noting related to code or explication might be specific to my lack of experience, and unnecessary for our particular audience.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: