Replies: 2 comments
-
To be clear, are you asking about the details of / looking to use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hi,
Basically I am trying to implement "polar" boundary conditions on the ix1
direction in cylindrical geometry.
In principle the "polar" bc is set for a spherical grid on the x2
direction.
Omer
…On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:04 AM Kyle Gerard Felker ***@***.***> wrote:
To be clear, are you asking about the details of / looking to use ix1_bc,
ox1_bc radial outflow boundary conditions?
https://github.com/PrincetonUniversity/athena/wiki/Boundary-Conditions
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#644 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3AOFP4XPZ3TR5SJOYWTJD2KM3NPAVCNFSM6AAAAABVBEUEIKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTCOBRGU4TCMA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello, I am trying to implement transmissive boundary conditions on the axis of a cylindrical grid.
for this I am copying the primitive values from the innermost cells on one side of the axis to ghost cells on the other side of the axis. The problem is that the volume of the cells is different since there is a difference in the cylindrical radius of the cells.
The ghost cells of the inner radial boundary have a smaller cylindrical radius and a smaller volume than their counterparts cells in the computational domain. My question, do I need to account for the volume and face area differences when setting up the density, pressure and magnetic field values at the ghost cells, or is this difference is taken care of internally by the code through the grid metric?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions