Rust unstable features needed for the kernel #2
Labels
Comments
ojeda
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 7, 2020
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
Allocating memory with regulator_list_mutex held makes lockdep unhappy when memory pressure makes the system do fs_reclaim on eg. eMMC using a regulator. Push the lock inside regulator_init_coupling() after the allocation. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.7.13+ #533 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/383 is trying to acquire lock: cca78ca4 (&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: __submit_merged_write_cond+0x104/0x154 but task is already holding lock: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.11+0x40/0x50 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x24/0x28 __kmalloc+0x54/0x218 regulator_register+0x860/0x1584 dummy_regulator_probe+0x60/0xa8 [...] other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem --> regulator_list_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(regulator_list_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&sbi->write_io[i][j].io_rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kswapd0/383: #0: c0e38518 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x0/0x50 [...] Fixes: d8ca7d1 ("regulator: core: Introduce API for regulators coupling customization") Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1a889cf7f61c6429c9e6b34ddcdde99be77a26b6.1597195321.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock: ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by compsize/11122: #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks, which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user(). This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed. Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then copy_to_user_nofault for the copying. CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
I got the following lockdep splat while testing: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 but task is already holding lock: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 smp_init+0x26/0x71 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258 kernel_init+0xa/0x103 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by btrfs/229626: #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630 #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other dependencies. Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different problem for which this fix is a solution. Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually assign them to the fs_info. We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to safely free the workqueues. CC: [email protected] # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
…emory If the hypervisor doesn't support hugepages, the kernel ends up allocating a large number of page table pages. The early page table allocation was wrongly setting the max memblock limit to ppc64_rma_size with radix translation which resulted in boot failure as shown below. Kernel panic - not syncing: early_alloc_pgtable: Failed to allocate 16777216 bytes align=0x1000000 nid=-1 from=0x0000000000000000 max_addr=0xffffffffffffffff CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.8.0-24.9-default+ #2 Call Trace: [c0000000016f3d00] [c0000000007c6470] dump_stack+0xc4/0x114 (unreliable) [c0000000016f3d40] [c00000000014c78c] panic+0x164/0x418 [c0000000016f3dd0] [c000000000098890] early_alloc_pgtable+0xe0/0xec [c0000000016f3e60] [c0000000010a5440] radix__early_init_mmu+0x360/0x4b4 [c0000000016f3ef0] [c000000001099bac] early_init_mmu+0x1c/0x3c [c0000000016f3f10] [c00000000109a320] early_setup+0x134/0x170 This was because the kernel was checking for the radix feature before we enable the feature via mmu_features. This resulted in the kernel using hash restrictions on radix. Rework the early init code such that the kernel boot with memblock restrictions as imposed by hash. At that point, the kernel still hasn't finalized the translation the kernel will end up using. We have three different ways of detecting radix. 1. dt_cpu_ftrs_scan -> used only in case of PowerNV 2. ibm,pa-features -> Used when we don't use cpu_dt_ftr_scan 3. CAS -> Where we negotiate with hypervisor about the supported translation. We look at 1 or 2 early in the boot and after that, we look at the CAS vector to finalize the translation the kernel will use. We also support a kernel command line option (disable_radix) to switch to hash. Update the memblock limit after mmu_early_init_devtree() if the kernel is going to use radix translation. This forces some of the memblock allocations we do before mmu_early_init_devtree() to be within the RMA limit. Fixes: 2bfd65e ("powerpc/mm/radix: Add radix callbacks for early init routines") Reported-by: Shirisha Ganta <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
…s metrics" test Linux 5.9 introduced perf test case "Parse and process metrics" and on s390 this test case always dumps core: [root@t35lp67 perf]# ./perf test -vvvv -F 67 67: Parse and process metrics : --- start --- metric expr inst_retired.any / cpu_clk_unhalted.thread for IPC parsing metric: inst_retired.any / cpu_clk_unhalted.thread Segmentation fault (core dumped) [root@t35lp67 perf]# I debugged this core dump and gdb shows this call chain: (gdb) where #0 0x000003ffabc3192a in __strnlen_c_1 () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x000003ffabc293de in strcasestr () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x0000000001102ba2 in match_metric(list=0x1e6ea20 "inst_retired.any", n=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:368 #3 find_metric (map=<optimized out>, map=<optimized out>, metric=0x1e6ea20 "inst_retired.any") at util/metricgroup.c:765 #4 __resolve_metric (ids=0x0, map=<optimized out>, metric_list=0x0, metric_no_group=<optimized out>, m=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:844 #5 resolve_metric (ids=0x0, map=0x0, metric_list=0x0, metric_no_group=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:881 #6 metricgroup__add_metric (metric=<optimized out>, metric_no_group=metric_no_group@entry=false, events=<optimized out>, events@entry=0x3ffd84fb878, metric_list=0x0, metric_list@entry=0x3ffd84fb868, map=0x0) at util/metricgroup.c:943 #7 0x00000000011034ae in metricgroup__add_metric_list (map=0x13f9828 <map>, metric_list=0x3ffd84fb868, events=0x3ffd84fb878, metric_no_group=<optimized out>, list=<optimized out>) at util/metricgroup.c:988 #8 parse_groups (perf_evlist=perf_evlist@entry=0x1e70260, str=str@entry=0x12f34b2 "IPC", metric_no_group=<optimized out>, metric_no_merge=<optimized out>, fake_pmu=fake_pmu@entry=0x1462f18 <perf_pmu.fake>, metric_events=0x3ffd84fba58, map=0x1) at util/metricgroup.c:1040 #9 0x0000000001103eb2 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test( evlist=evlist@entry=0x1e70260, map=map@entry=0x13f9828 <map>, str=str@entry=0x12f34b2 "IPC", metric_no_group=metric_no_group@entry=false, metric_no_merge=metric_no_merge@entry=false, metric_events=0x3ffd84fba58) at util/metricgroup.c:1082 #10 0x00000000010c84d8 in __compute_metric (ratio2=0x0, name2=0x0, ratio1=<synthetic pointer>, name1=0x12f34b2 "IPC", vals=0x3ffd84fbad8, name=0x12f34b2 "IPC") at tests/parse-metric.c:159 #11 compute_metric (ratio=<synthetic pointer>, vals=0x3ffd84fbad8, name=0x12f34b2 "IPC") at tests/parse-metric.c:189 #12 test_ipc () at tests/parse-metric.c:208 ..... ..... omitted many more lines This test case was added with commit 218ca91 ("perf tests: Add parse metric test for frontend metric"). When I compile with make DEBUG=y it works fine and I do not get a core dump. It turned out that the above listed function call chain worked on a struct pmu_event array which requires a trailing element with zeroes which was missing. The marco map_for_each_event() loops over that array tests for members metric_expr/metric_name/metric_group being non-NULL. Adding this element fixes the issue. Output after: [root@t35lp46 perf]# ./perf test 67 67: Parse and process metrics : Ok [root@t35lp46 perf]# Committer notes: As Ian remarks, this is not s390 specific: <quote Ian> This also shows up with address sanitizer on all architectures (perhaps change the patch title) and perhaps add a "Fixes: <commit>" tag. ================================================================= ==4718==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address 0x55c93b4d59e8 at pc 0x55c93a1541e2 bp 0x7ffd24327c60 sp 0x7ffd24327c58 READ of size 8 at 0x55c93b4d59e8 thread T0 #0 0x55c93a1541e1 in find_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:764:2 #1 0x55c93a153e6c in __resolve_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:844:9 #2 0x55c93a152f18 in resolve_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:881:9 #3 0x55c93a1528db in metricgroup__add_metric tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:943:9 #4 0x55c93a151996 in metricgroup__add_metric_list tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:988:9 #5 0x55c93a1511b9 in parse_groups tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:1040:8 #6 0x55c93a1513e1 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:1082:9 #7 0x55c93a0108ae in __compute_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:159:8 #8 0x55c93a010744 in compute_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:189:9 #9 0x55c93a00f5ee in test_ipc tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:208:2 #10 0x55c93a00f1e8 in test__parse_metric tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:345:2 #11 0x55c939fd7202 in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:410:9 #12 0x55c939fd6736 in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:440:9 #13 0x55c939fd58c3 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:661:4 #14 0x55c939fd4e02 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:807:9 #15 0x55c939e4763d in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #16 0x55c939e46475 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #17 0x55c939e4737e in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #18 0x55c939e45f7e in main tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 0x55c93b4d59e8 is located 0 bytes to the right of global variable 'pme_test' defined in 'tools/perf/tests/parse-metric.c:17:25' (0x55c93b4d54a0) of size 1352 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c:764:2 in find_metric Shadow bytes around the buggy address: 0x0ab9a7692ae0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692af0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 =>0x0ab9a7692b30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00[f9]f9 f9 0x0ab9a7692b40: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0ab9a7692b50: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 0x0ab9a7692b60: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0x0ab9a7692b80: f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 f9 Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes): Addressable: 00 Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 Heap left redzone: fa Freed heap region: fd Stack left redzone: f1 Stack mid redzone: f2 Stack right redzone: f3 Stack after return: f5 Stack use after scope: f8 Global redzone: f9 Global init order: f6 Poisoned by user: f7 Container overflow: fc Array cookie: ac Intra object redzone: bb ASan internal: fe Left alloca redzone: ca Right alloca redzone: cb Shadow gap: cc </quote> I'm also adding the missing "Fixes" tag and setting just .name to NULL, as doing it that way is more compact (the compiler will zero out everything else) and the table iterators look for .name being NULL as the sentinel marking the end of the table. Fixes: 0a507af ("perf tests: Add parse metric test for ipc metric") Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Sumanth Korikkar <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
Yonghong Song says: ==================== Currently, the bpf hashmap iterator takes a bucket_lock, a spin_lock, before visiting each element in the bucket. This will cause a deadlock if a map update/delete operates on an element with the same bucket id of the visited map. To avoid the deadlock, let us just use rcu_read_lock instead of bucket_lock. This may result in visiting stale elements, missing some elements, or repeating some elements, if concurrent map delete/update happens for the same map. I think using rcu_read_lock is a reasonable compromise. For users caring stale/missing/repeating element issues, bpf map batch access syscall interface can be used. Note that another approach is during bpf_iter link stage, we check whether the iter program might be able to do update/delete to the visited map. If it is, reject the link_create. Verifier needs to record whether an update/delete operation happens for each map for this approach. I just feel this checking is too specialized, hence still prefer rcu_read_lock approach. Patch #1 has the kernel implementation and Patch #2 added a selftest which can trigger deadlock without Patch #1. ==================== Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
The dev_iommu_priv_set() must be called after probe_device(). This fixes a NULL pointer deference bug when booting a system with kernel cmdline "intel_iommu=on,igfx_off", where the dev_iommu_priv_set() is abused. The following stacktrace was produced: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/isolinux/bzImage console=tty1 intel_iommu=on,igfx_off ... DMAR: Host address width 39 DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fed90000 flags: 0x0 DMAR: dmar0: reg_base_addr fed90000 ver 1:0 cap 1c0000c40660462 ecap 19e2ff0505e DMAR: DRHD base: 0x000000fed91000 flags: 0x1 DMAR: dmar1: reg_base_addr fed91000 ver 1:0 cap d2008c40660462 ecap f050da DMAR: RMRR base: 0x0000009aa9f000 end: 0x0000009aabefff DMAR: RMRR base: 0x0000009d000000 end: 0x0000009f7fffff DMAR: No ATSR found BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000038 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.9.0-devel+ #2 Hardware name: LENOVO 20HGS0TW00/20HGS0TW00, BIOS N1WET46S (1.25s ) 03/30/2018 RIP: 0010:intel_iommu_init+0xed0/0x1136 Code: fe e9 61 02 00 00 bb f4 ff ff ff e9 57 02 00 00 48 63 d1 48 c1 e2 04 48 03 50 20 48 8b 12 48 85 d2 74 0b 48 8b 92 d0 02 00 00 48 89 7a 38 ff c1 e9 15 f5 ff ff 48 c7 c7 60 99 ac a7 49 c7 c7 a0 RSP: 0000:ffff96d180073dd0 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: ffff8c91037a7d20 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffffffffffff RBP: ffff96d180073e90 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8c91039fe3c0 R10: 0000000000000226 R11: 0000000000000226 R12: 000000000000000b R13: ffff8c910367c650 R14: ffffffffa8426d60 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c9107480000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000038 CR3: 00000004b100a001 CR4: 00000000003706e0 Call Trace: ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1f/0x30 ? call_rcu+0x10e/0x320 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2c/0xd0 ? rdinit_setup+0x2c/0x2c ? e820__memblock_setup+0x8b/0x8b pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x3f do_one_initcall+0x46/0x1e4 kernel_init_freeable+0x169/0x1b2 ? rest_init+0x9f/0x9f kernel_init+0xa/0x101 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Modules linked in: CR2: 0000000000000038 ---[ end trace 3653722a6f936f18 ]--- Fixes: 01b9d4e ("iommu/vt-d: Use dev_iommu_priv_get/set()") Reported-by: Torsten Hilbrich <[email protected]> Reported-by: Wendy Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]> Tested-by: Torsten Hilbrich <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
Luo bin says: ==================== hinic: BugFixes The bugs fixed in this patchset have been present since the following commits: patch #1: Fixes: 00e57a6 ("net-next/hinic: Add Tx operation") patch #2: Fixes: 5e126e7 ("hinic: add firmware update support") ==================== Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
Nikolay reported a lockdep splat in generic/476 that I could reproduce with btrfs/187. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9e8ef38b6268 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x1a0 btrfs_alloc_device+0x43/0x210 add_missing_dev+0x20/0x90 read_one_chunk+0x301/0x430 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x17b/0x1b0 open_ctree+0xa62/0x1896 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x379 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 vfs_rmdir.part.0+0x149/0x160 do_rmdir+0x136/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa9d65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9e8e9da260e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x92/0xc8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x11e/0x500 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This is because we are holding the chunk_mutex when we call btrfs_alloc_device, which does a GFP_KERNEL allocation. We don't want to switch that to a GFP_NOFS lock because this is the only place where it matters. So instead use memalloc_nofs_save() around the allocation in order to avoid the lockdep splat. Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
…arnings Since commit 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key"), cascaded DSA setups (DSA switch port as DSA master for another DSA switch port) are emitting this lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.8.0-rc1-00133-g923e4b5032dd-dirty #208 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- dhcpcd/323 is trying to acquire lock: ffff000066dd4268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff00006608c268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1); lock(&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by dhcpcd/323: #0: ffffdbd1381dda18 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock+0x24/0x30 #1: ffff00006614b268 (_xmit_ETHER){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x28/0x48 #2: ffff00006608c268 (&dsa_master_addr_list_lock_key/1){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 stack backtrace: Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack+0xec/0x158 __lock_acquire+0xca0/0x2398 lock_acquire+0xe8/0x440 _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x64/0x90 dev_mc_sync+0x44/0x90 dsa_slave_set_rx_mode+0x34/0x50 __dev_set_rx_mode+0x60/0xa0 dev_mc_sync+0x84/0x90 dsa_slave_set_rx_mode+0x34/0x50 __dev_set_rx_mode+0x60/0xa0 dev_set_rx_mode+0x30/0x48 __dev_open+0x10c/0x180 __dev_change_flags+0x170/0x1c8 dev_change_flags+0x2c/0x70 devinet_ioctl+0x774/0x878 inet_ioctl+0x348/0x3b0 sock_do_ioctl+0x50/0x310 sock_ioctl+0x1f8/0x580 ksys_ioctl+0xb0/0xf0 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x180 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x98 el0_sync_handler+0x9c/0x1b8 el0_sync+0x158/0x180 Since DSA never made use of the netdev API for describing links between upper devices and lower devices, the dev->lower_level value of a DSA switch interface would be 1, which would warn when it is a DSA master. We can use netdev_upper_dev_link() to describe the relationship between a DSA slave and a DSA master. To be precise, a DSA "slave" (switch port) is an "upper" to a DSA "master" (host port). The relationship is "many uppers to one lower", like in the case of VLAN. So, for that reason, we use the same function as VLAN uses. There might be a chance that somebody will try to take hold of this interface and use it immediately after register_netdev() and before netdev_upper_dev_link(). To avoid that, we do the registration and linkage while holding the RTNL, and we use the RTNL-locked cousin of register_netdev(), which is register_netdevice(). Since this warning was not there when lockdep was using dynamic keys for addr_list_lock, we are blaming the lockdep patch itself. The network stack _has_ been using static lockdep keys before, and it _is_ likely that stacked DSA setups have been triggering these lockdep warnings since forever, however I can't test very old kernels on this particular stacked DSA setup, to ensure I'm not in fact introducing regressions. Fixes: 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key") Suggested-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
syzbot reported twice a lockdep issue in fib6_del() [1]
which I think is caused by net->ipv6.fib6_null_entry
having a NULL fib6_table pointer.
fib6_del() already checks for fib6_null_entry special
case, we only need to return earlier.
Bug seems to occur very rarely, I have thus chosen
a 'bug origin' that makes backports not too complex.
[1]
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1996 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
4 locks held by syz-executor.5/8095:
#0: ffffffff8a7ea708 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ppp_release+0x178/0x240 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:401
#1: ffff88804c422dd8 (&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_trylock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:414 [inline]
#1: ffff88804c422dd8 (&net->ipv6.fib6_gc_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: fib6_run_gc+0x21b/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2312
#2: ffffffff89bd6a40 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __fib6_clean_all+0x0/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2613
#3: ffff8880a82e6430 (&tb->tb6_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:359 [inline]
#3: ffff8880a82e6430 (&tb->tb6_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __fib6_clean_all+0x107/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2245
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 8095 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
fib6_del+0x12b4/0x1630 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1996
fib6_clean_node+0x39b/0x570 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2180
fib6_walk_continue+0x4aa/0x8e0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2102
fib6_walk+0x182/0x370 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2150
fib6_clean_tree+0xdb/0x120 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2230
__fib6_clean_all+0x120/0x290 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2246
fib6_clean_all net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2257 [inline]
fib6_run_gc+0x113/0x2d0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:2320
ndisc_netdev_event+0x217/0x350 net/ipv6/ndisc.c:1805
notifier_call_chain+0xb5/0x200 kernel/notifier.c:83
call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xb5/0x130 net/core/dev.c:2033
call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2045 [inline]
call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2059 [inline]
dev_close_many+0x30b/0x650 net/core/dev.c:1634
rollback_registered_many+0x3a8/0x1210 net/core/dev.c:9261
rollback_registered net/core/dev.c:9329 [inline]
unregister_netdevice_queue+0x2dd/0x570 net/core/dev.c:10410
unregister_netdevice include/linux/netdevice.h:2774 [inline]
ppp_release+0x216/0x240 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c:403
__fput+0x285/0x920 fs/file_table.c:281
task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141
tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline]
exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190
syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Fixes: 421842e ("net/ipv6: Add fib6_null_entry")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== net: Fix bridge enslavement failure Patch #1 fixes an issue in which an upper netdev cannot be enslaved to a bridge when it has multiple netdevs with different parent identifiers beneath it. Patch #2 adds a test case using two netdevsim instances. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
When compiling with DEBUG=1 on Fedora 32 I'm getting crash for 'perf test signal': Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000c68548 in __test_function () #1 0x00000000004d62e9 in test_function () at tests/bp_signal.c:61 #2 0x00000000004d689a in test__bp_signal (test=0xa8e280 <generic_ ... #3 0x00000000004b7d49 in run_test (test=0xa8e280 <generic_tests+1 ... #4 0x00000000004b7e7f in test_and_print (t=0xa8e280 <generic_test ... #5 0x00000000004b8927 in __cmd_test (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffdce0, ... ... It's caused by the symbol __test_function being in the ".bss" section: $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [28] .bss NOBITS 0000000000c356a0 008346a0 00000000000511f8 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 32 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 0000000000c68548 B __test_function I guess most of the time we're just lucky the inline asm ended up in the ".text" section, so making it specific explicit with push and pop section clauses. $ readelf -a ./perf | less [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [13] .text PROGBITS 0000000000431240 00031240 0000000000306faa 0000000000000000 AX 0 0 16 $ nm perf | grep __test_function 00000000004d62c8 T __test_function Committer testing: $ readelf -wi ~/bin/perf | grep producer -m1 <c> DW_AT_producer : (indirect string, offset: 0x254a): GNU C99 10.2.1 20200723 (Red Hat 10.2.1-1) -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -ggdb3 -std=gnu99 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -fstack-protector-all ^^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^ $ Before: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : FAILED! $ After: $ perf test signal 20: Breakpoint overflow signal handler : Ok $ Fixes: 8fd34e1 ("perf test: Improve bp_signal") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Michael Petlan <[email protected]> Cc: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
The aliases were never released causing the following leaks:
Indirect leak of 1224 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7feefb830628 in malloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x107628)
#1 0x56332c8f1b62 in __perf_pmu__new_alias util/pmu.c:322
#2 0x56332c8f401f in pmu_add_cpu_aliases_map util/pmu.c:778
#3 0x56332c792ce9 in __test__pmu_event_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:295
#4 0x56332c792ce9 in test_aliases tests/pmu-events.c:367
#5 0x56332c76a09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
#6 0x56332c76a09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
#7 0x56332c76ce69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695
#8 0x56332c76ce69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
#9 0x56332c7d2214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
#10 0x56332c6701a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
#11 0x56332c6701a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
#12 0x56332c6701a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
#13 0x7feefb359cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
Fixes: 956a783 ("perf test: Test pmu-events aliases")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: John Garry <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
The evsel->unit borrows a pointer of pmu event or alias instead of
owns a string. But tool event (duration_time) passes a result of
strdup() caused a leak.
It was found by ASAN during metric test:
Direct leak of 210 byte(s) in 70 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fe366fca0b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5)
#1 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in add_event_tool util/parse-events.c:414
#2 0x559fbbcc6ea3 in parse_events_add_tool util/parse-events.c:1414
#3 0x559fbbd8474d in parse_events_parse util/parse-events.y:439
#4 0x559fbbcc95da in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:2096
#5 0x559fbbcc95da in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2141
#6 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:406
#7 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_id tests/pmu-events.c:393
#8 0x559fbbc28555 in check_parse_cpu tests/pmu-events.c:415
#9 0x559fbbc28555 in test_parsing tests/pmu-events.c:498
#10 0x559fbbc0109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
#11 0x559fbbc0109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
#12 0x559fbbc03e69 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:695
#13 0x559fbbc03e69 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
#14 0x559fbbc691f4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
#15 0x559fbbb071a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
#16 0x559fbbb071a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
#17 0x559fbbb071a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
#18 0x7fe366b68cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
Fixes: f0fbb11 ("perf stat: Implement duration_time as a proper event")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
The test_generic_metric() missed to release entries in the pctx. Asan
reported following leak (and more):
Direct leak of 128 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f4c9396980e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
#1 0x55f7e748cc14 in hashmap_grow (/home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x90cc14)
#2 0x55f7e748d497 in hashmap__insert (/home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x90d497)
#3 0x55f7e7341667 in hashmap__set /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/util/hashmap.h:111
#4 0x55f7e7341667 in expr__add_ref util/expr.c:120
#5 0x55f7e7292436 in prepare_metric util/stat-shadow.c:783
#6 0x55f7e729556d in test_generic_metric util/stat-shadow.c:858
#7 0x55f7e712390b in compute_single tests/parse-metric.c:128
#8 0x55f7e712390b in __compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:180
#9 0x55f7e712446d in compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:196
#10 0x55f7e712446d in test_dcache_l2 tests/parse-metric.c:295
#11 0x55f7e712446d in test__parse_metric tests/parse-metric.c:355
#12 0x55f7e70be09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
#13 0x55f7e70be09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
#14 0x55f7e70c101a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
#15 0x55f7e70c101a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
#16 0x55f7e7126214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
#17 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
#18 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
#19 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
#20 0x7f4c93492cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
Fixes: 6d432c4 ("perf tools: Add test_generic_metric function")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
The metricgroup__add_metric() can find multiple match for a metric group
and it's possible to fail. Also it can fail in the middle like in
resolve_metric() even for single metric.
In those cases, the intermediate list and ids will be leaked like:
Direct leak of 3 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f4c938f40b5 in strdup (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x920b5)
#1 0x55f7e71c1bef in __add_metric util/metricgroup.c:683
#2 0x55f7e71c31d0 in add_metric util/metricgroup.c:906
#3 0x55f7e71c3844 in metricgroup__add_metric util/metricgroup.c:940
#4 0x55f7e71c488d in metricgroup__add_metric_list util/metricgroup.c:993
#5 0x55f7e71c488d in parse_groups util/metricgroup.c:1045
#6 0x55f7e71c60a4 in metricgroup__parse_groups_test util/metricgroup.c:1087
#7 0x55f7e71235ae in __compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:164
#8 0x55f7e7124650 in compute_metric tests/parse-metric.c:196
#9 0x55f7e7124650 in test_recursion_fail tests/parse-metric.c:318
#10 0x55f7e7124650 in test__parse_metric tests/parse-metric.c:356
#11 0x55f7e70be09b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
#12 0x55f7e70be09b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
#13 0x55f7e70c101a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
#14 0x55f7e70c101a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
#15 0x55f7e7126214 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
#16 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
#17 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
#18 0x55f7e6fc41a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
#19 0x7f4c93492cc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
Fixes: 83de0b7 ("perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
The following leaks were detected by ASAN:
Indirect leak of 360 byte(s) in 9 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fecc305180e in calloc (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.5+0x10780e)
#1 0x560578f6dce5 in perf_pmu__new_format util/pmu.c:1333
#2 0x560578f752fc in perf_pmu_parse util/pmu.y:59
#3 0x560578f6a8b7 in perf_pmu__format_parse util/pmu.c:73
#4 0x560578e07045 in test__pmu tests/pmu.c:155
#5 0x560578de109b in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:410
#6 0x560578de109b in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:440
#7 0x560578de401a in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:661
#8 0x560578de401a in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:807
#9 0x560578e49354 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:312
#10 0x560578ce71a8 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:364
#11 0x560578ce71a8 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:408
#12 0x560578ce71a8 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:538
#13 0x7fecc2b7acc9 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
Fixes: cff7f95 ("perf tests: Move pmu tests into separate object")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into kvm-master KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.9, take #2 - Fix handling of S1 Page Table Walk permission fault at S2 on instruction fetch - Cleanup kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite()
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
syzbot reports a potential lock deadlock between the normal IO path and
->show_fdinfo():
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/19710 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888098ddc450 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880a11b8428 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xe9a/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8348
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
__io_uring_show_fdinfo fs/io_uring.c:8417 [inline]
io_uring_show_fdinfo+0x194/0xc70 fs/io_uring.c:8460
seq_show+0x4a8/0x700 fs/proc/fd.c:65
seq_read+0x432/0x1070 fs/seq_file.c:208
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:734 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:721 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x48e/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:955
vfs_readv+0xe5/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1073
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:355 [inline]
default_file_splice_read.constprop.0+0x4e6/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:412
do_splice_to+0x137/0x170 fs/splice.c:871
splice_direct_to_actor+0x307/0x980 fs/splice.c:950
do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:1059
do_sendfile+0x55f/0xd40 fs/read_write.c:1540
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1601 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1587 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1587
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #1 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103
seq_read+0x61/0x1070 fs/seq_file.c:155
pde_read fs/proc/inode.c:306 [inline]
proc_reg_read+0x221/0x300 fs/proc/inode.c:318
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:734 [inline]
do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:721 [inline]
do_iter_read+0x48e/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:955
vfs_readv+0xe5/0x150 fs/read_write.c:1073
kernel_readv fs/splice.c:355 [inline]
default_file_splice_read.constprop.0+0x4e6/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:412
do_splice_to+0x137/0x170 fs/splice.c:871
splice_direct_to_actor+0x307/0x980 fs/splice.c:950
do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:1059
do_sendfile+0x55f/0xd40 fs/read_write.c:1540
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1601 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1587 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1587
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4441
lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xaf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5029
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write+0x228/0x450 fs/super.c:1672
io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296
io_issue_sqe+0x18f/0x5c50 fs/io_uring.c:5719
__io_queue_sqe+0x280/0x1160 fs/io_uring.c:6175
io_queue_sqe+0x692/0xfa0 fs/io_uring.c:6254
io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6324 [inline]
io_submit_sqes+0x1761/0x2400 fs/io_uring.c:6521
__do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xeac/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8349
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
sb_writers#4 --> &p->lock --> &ctx->uring_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
lock(&p->lock);
lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
lock(sb_writers#4);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor.2/19710:
#0: ffff8880a11b8428 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xe9a/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8348
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 19710 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4441
lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xaf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5029
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write+0x228/0x450 fs/super.c:1672
io_write+0x6b5/0xb30 fs/io_uring.c:3296
io_issue_sqe+0x18f/0x5c50 fs/io_uring.c:5719
__io_queue_sqe+0x280/0x1160 fs/io_uring.c:6175
io_queue_sqe+0x692/0xfa0 fs/io_uring.c:6254
io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6324 [inline]
io_submit_sqes+0x1761/0x2400 fs/io_uring.c:6521
__do_sys_io_uring_enter+0xeac/0x1bd0 fs/io_uring.c:8349
do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x45e179
Code: 3d b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 0b b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f1194e74c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001aa
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000082c0 RCX: 000000000045e179
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000118cf98 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000118cf4c
R13: 00007ffd1aa5756f R14: 00007f1194e759c0 R15: 000000000118cf4c
Fix this by just not diving into details if we fail to trylock the
io_uring mutex. We know the ctx isn't going away during this operation,
but we cannot safely iterate buffers/files/personalities if we don't
hold the io_uring mutex.
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
This patch is to add a new variable 'nested_level' into the net_device
structure.
This variable will be used as a parameter of spin_lock_nested() of
dev->addr_list_lock.
netif_addr_lock() can be called recursively so spin_lock_nested() is
used instead of spin_lock() and dev->lower_level is used as a parameter
of spin_lock_nested().
But, dev->lower_level value can be updated while it is being used.
So, lockdep would warn a possible deadlock scenario.
When a stacked interface is deleted, netif_{uc | mc}_sync() is
called recursively.
So, spin_lock_nested() is called recursively too.
At this moment, the dev->lower_level variable is used as a parameter of it.
dev->lower_level value is updated when interfaces are being unlinked/linked
immediately.
Thus, After unlinking, dev->lower_level shouldn't be a parameter of
spin_lock_nested().
A (macvlan)
|
B (vlan)
|
C (bridge)
|
D (macvlan)
|
E (vlan)
|
F (bridge)
A->lower_level : 6
B->lower_level : 5
C->lower_level : 4
D->lower_level : 3
E->lower_level : 2
F->lower_level : 1
When an interface 'A' is removed, it releases resources.
At this moment, netif_addr_lock() would be called.
Then, netdev_upper_dev_unlink() is called recursively.
Then dev->lower_level is updated.
There is no problem.
But, when the bridge module is removed, 'C' and 'F' interfaces
are removed at once.
If 'F' is removed first, a lower_level value is like below.
A->lower_level : 5
B->lower_level : 4
C->lower_level : 3
D->lower_level : 2
E->lower_level : 1
F->lower_level : 1
Then, 'C' is removed. at this moment, netif_addr_lock() is called
recursively.
The ordering is like this.
C(3)->D(2)->E(1)->F(1)
At this moment, the lower_level value of 'E' and 'F' are the same.
So, lockdep warns a possible deadlock scenario.
In order to avoid this problem, a new variable 'nested_level' is added.
This value is the same as dev->lower_level - 1.
But this value is updated in rtnl_unlock().
So, this variable can be used as a parameter of spin_lock_nested() safely
in the rtnl context.
Test commands:
ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link add vlan1 link br0 type vlan id 10
ip link add macvlan2 link vlan1 type macvlan
ip link add br3 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link set macvlan2 master br3
ip link add vlan4 link br3 type vlan id 10
ip link add macvlan5 link vlan4 type macvlan
ip link add br6 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link set macvlan5 master br6
ip link add vlan7 link br6 type vlan id 10
ip link add macvlan8 link vlan7 type macvlan
ip link set br0 up
ip link set vlan1 up
ip link set macvlan2 up
ip link set br3 up
ip link set vlan4 up
ip link set macvlan5 up
ip link set br6 up
ip link set vlan7 up
ip link set macvlan8 up
modprobe -rv bridge
Splat looks like:
[ 36.057436][ T744] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 36.058848][ T744] 5.9.0-rc6+ #728 Not tainted
[ 36.059959][ T744] --------------------------------------------
[ 36.061391][ T744] ip/744 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 36.062590][ T744] ffff8c4767509280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.064922][ T744]
[ 36.064922][ T744] but task is already holding lock:
[ 36.066626][ T744] ffff8c4767769280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_add+0x1e/0x60
[ 36.068851][ T744]
[ 36.068851][ T744] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 36.070731][ T744] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 36.070731][ T744]
[ 36.072497][ T744] CPU0
[ 36.073238][ T744] ----
[ 36.074007][ T744] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[ 36.075290][ T744] lock(&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key);
[ 36.076590][ T744]
[ 36.076590][ T744] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 36.076590][ T744]
[ 36.078515][ T744] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 36.078515][ T744]
[ 36.080491][ T744] 3 locks held by ip/744:
[ 36.081471][ T744] #0: ffffffff98571df0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x236/0x490
[ 36.083614][ T744] #1: ffff8c4767769280 (&vlan_netdev_addr_lock_key){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_add+0x1e/0x60
[ 36.085942][ T744] #2: ffff8c476c8da280 (&bridge_netdev_addr_lock_key/4){+...}-{2:2}, at: dev_uc_sync+0x39/0x80
[ 36.088400][ T744]
[ 36.088400][ T744] stack backtrace:
[ 36.089772][ T744] CPU: 6 PID: 744 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6+ #728
[ 36.091364][ T744] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 36.093630][ T744] Call Trace:
[ 36.094416][ T744] dump_stack+0x77/0x9b
[ 36.095385][ T744] __lock_acquire+0xbc3/0x1f40
[ 36.096522][ T744] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[ 36.097540][ T744] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.098657][ T744] ? rtmsg_ifinfo+0x1f/0x30
[ 36.099711][ T744] ? __dev_notify_flags+0xa5/0xf0
[ 36.100874][ T744] ? rtnl_is_locked+0x11/0x20
[ 36.101967][ T744] ? __dev_set_promiscuity+0x7b/0x1a0
[ 36.103230][ T744] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x70
[ 36.104348][ T744] ? dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.105461][ T744] dev_set_rx_mode+0x19/0x30
[ 36.106532][ T744] dev_set_promiscuity+0x36/0x50
[ 36.107692][ T744] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x123/0x1a0
[ 36.108929][ T744] dev_set_promiscuity+0x1e/0x50
[ 36.110093][ T744] br_port_set_promisc+0x1f/0x40 [bridge]
[ 36.111415][ T744] br_manage_promisc+0x8b/0xe0 [bridge]
[ 36.112728][ T744] __dev_set_promiscuity+0x123/0x1a0
[ 36.113967][ T744] ? __hw_addr_sync_one+0x23/0x50
[ 36.115135][ T744] __dev_set_rx_mode+0x68/0x90
[ 36.116249][ T744] dev_uc_sync+0x70/0x80
[ 36.117244][ T744] dev_uc_add+0x50/0x60
[ 36.118223][ T744] macvlan_open+0x18e/0x1f0 [macvlan]
[ 36.119470][ T744] __dev_open+0xd6/0x170
[ 36.120470][ T744] __dev_change_flags+0x181/0x1d0
[ 36.121644][ T744] dev_change_flags+0x23/0x60
[ 36.122741][ T744] do_setlink+0x30a/0x11e0
[ 36.123778][ T744] ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[ 36.124929][ T744] ? __nla_validate_parse.part.6+0x45/0x8e0
[ 36.126309][ T744] ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[ 36.127457][ T744] __rtnl_newlink+0x546/0x8e0
[ 36.128560][ T744] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[ 36.129623][ T744] ? deactivate_slab.isra.85+0x6a1/0x850
[ 36.130946][ T744] ? __lock_acquire+0x92c/0x1f40
[ 36.132102][ T744] ? lock_acquire+0xb4/0x3b0
[ 36.133176][ T744] ? is_bpf_text_address+0x5/0xe0
[ 36.134364][ T744] ? rtnl_newlink+0x2e/0x70
[ 36.135445][ T744] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x32/0x60
[ 36.136771][ T744] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x2d8/0x380
[ 36.138070][ T744] ? rtnl_newlink+0x2e/0x70
[ 36.139164][ T744] rtnl_newlink+0x47/0x70
[ ... ]
Fixes: 845e0eb ("net: change addr_list_lock back to static key")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 28, 2020
When closing and freeing the source device we could end up doing our final blkdev_put() on the bdev, which will grab the bd_mutex. As such we want to be holding as few locks as possible, so move this call outside of the dev_replace->lock_finishing_cancel_unmount lock. Since we're modifying the fs_devices we need to make sure we're holding the uuid_mutex here, so take that as well. There's a report from syzbot probably hitting one of the cases where the bd_mutex and device_list_mutex are taken in the wrong order, however it's not with device replace, like this patch fixes. As there's no reproducer available so far, we can't verify the fix. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=84a0634dc5d21d488419 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.0/6878 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88804c17d780 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x281/0xf90 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5255 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2f3/0x700 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2109 __btrfs_end_transaction+0xf5/0x690 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:916 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3807 [inline] find_free_extent+0x23b7/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline] wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 -> #3 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write+0x234/0x470 fs/super.c:1672 sb_start_intwrite include/linux/fs.h:1690 [inline] start_transaction+0xbe7/0x1170 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:624 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3789 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25e1/0x2e60 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4127 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x166/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4206 cow_file_range+0x3de/0x9b0 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1063 btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x2cf/0x1410 fs/btrfs/inode.c:1838 writepage_delalloc+0x150/0x460 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3439 __extent_writepage+0x441/0xd00 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:3653 extent_write_cache_pages.constprop.0+0x69d/0x1040 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4249 extent_writepages+0xcd/0x2b0 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4370 do_writepages+0xec/0x290 mm/page-writeback.c:2352 __writeback_single_inode+0x125/0x1400 fs/fs-writeback.c:1461 writeback_sb_inodes+0x53d/0xf40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1721 wb_writeback+0x2ad/0xd40 fs/fs-writeback.c:1894 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2039 [inline] wb_workfn+0x2dc/0x13e0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2080 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 -> #2 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x60e/0xac0 kernel/workqueue.c:3041 wb_shutdown+0x180/0x220 mm/backing-dev.c:355 bdi_unregister+0x174/0x590 mm/backing-dev.c:872 del_gendisk+0x820/0xa10 block/genhd.c:933 loop_remove drivers/block/loop.c:2192 [inline] loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2291 [inline] loop_control_ioctl+0x3b1/0x480 drivers/block/loop.c:2257 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 lo_open+0x19/0xd0 drivers/block/loop.c:1893 __blkdev_get+0x759/0x1aa0 fs/block_dev.c:1507 blkdev_get fs/block_dev.c:1639 [inline] blkdev_open+0x227/0x300 fs/block_dev.c:1753 do_dentry_open+0x4b9/0x11b0 fs/open.c:817 do_open fs/namei.c:3251 [inline] path_openat+0x1b9a/0x2730 fs/namei.c:3368 do_filp_open+0x17e/0x3c0 fs/namei.c:3395 do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x420 fs/open.c:1168 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1184 [inline] __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1192 [inline] __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1188 [inline] __x64_sys_open+0x119/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1188 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline] btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline] btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline] close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline] btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &bdev->bd_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by syz-executor.0/6878: #0: ffff88809070c0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#70){++++}-{3:3}, at: deactivate_super+0xa5/0xd0 fs/super.c:365 #1: ffffffff8a5b37a8 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_close_devices+0x23/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1178 #2: ffff8880908cfce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: close_fs_devices.part.0+0x2e/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1159 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 6878 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118 check_noncircular+0x324/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1827 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2496 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2601 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3218 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x2a96/0x5780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4426 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xae0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5006 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:956 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x134/0x10e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1103 blkdev_put+0x30/0x520 fs/block_dev.c:1804 btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1117 [inline] btrfs_close_bdev fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1107 [inline] btrfs_close_one_device fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1133 [inline] close_fs_devices.part.0+0x1a4/0x800 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1161 close_fs_devices fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1193 [inline] btrfs_close_devices+0x95/0x1f0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1179 close_ctree+0x688/0x6cb fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4149 generic_shutdown_super+0x144/0x370 fs/super.c:464 kill_anon_super+0x36/0x60 fs/super.c:1108 btrfs_kill_super+0x38/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2265 deactivate_locked_super+0x94/0x160 fs/super.c:335 deactivate_super+0xad/0xd0 fs/super.c:366 cleanup_mnt+0x3a3/0x530 fs/namespace.c:1118 task_work_run+0xdd/0x190 kernel/task_work.c:141 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:163 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1e1/0x200 kernel/entry/common.c:190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0x2e0 kernel/entry/common.c:265 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x460027 RSP: 002b:00007fff59216328 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000076035 RCX: 0000000000460027 RDX: 0000000000403188 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: 00007fff592163d0 RBP: 0000000000000333 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000b R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff59217460 R13: 0000000002df2a60 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007fff59217460 Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]> [ add syzbot reference ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2020
Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Couple of fixes Patch #1 fixes firmware flashing when CONFIG_MLXSW_CORE=y and CONFIG_MLXFW=m. Patch #2 prevents EMAD transactions from needlessly failing when the system is under heavy load by using exponential backoff. Please consider patch #2 for stable. ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2020
When running test case btrfs/017 from fstests, lockdep reported the following splat: [ 1297.067385] ====================================================== [ 1297.067708] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 1297.068022] 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 Not tainted [ 1297.068322] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 1297.068629] btrfs/189080 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1297.068929] ffff9f2725731690 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.069274] but task is already holding lock: [ 1297.069868] ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.070219] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 1297.071131] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 1297.071721] -> #1 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 1297.072375] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 [ 1297.072710] __mutex_lock+0xa3/0xb30 [ 1297.073061] btrfs_qgroup_inherit+0x59/0x6a0 [btrfs] [ 1297.073421] create_subvol+0x194/0x990 [btrfs] [ 1297.073780] btrfs_mksubvol+0x3fb/0x4a0 [btrfs] [ 1297.074133] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x119/0x1a0 [btrfs] [ 1297.074498] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x58/0x80 [btrfs] [ 1297.074872] btrfs_ioctl+0x1a90/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.075245] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.075617] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1297.075993] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1297.076380] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 1297.077166] check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 [ 1297.077572] __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110 [ 1297.077984] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 [ 1297.078411] start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs] [ 1297.078853] btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.079323] btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.079789] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.080232] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1297.080680] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1297.081139] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1297.082536] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1297.083510] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1297.084005] ---- ---- [ 1297.084500] lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock); [ 1297.084994] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 1297.085485] lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock); [ 1297.085974] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 1297.086454] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1297.087880] 3 locks held by btrfs/189080: [ 1297.088324] #0: ffff9f2725731470 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0xa73/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.088799] #1: ffff9f2702b60cc0 (&fs_info->subvol_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.089284] #2: ffff9f2702b61a08 (&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_quota_enable+0x3b/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.089771] stack backtrace: [ 1297.090662] CPU: 5 PID: 189080 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4-btrfs-next-73 #1 [ 1297.091132] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1297.092123] Call Trace: [ 1297.092629] dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5 [ 1297.093115] check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 [ 1297.093596] check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 [ 1297.094076] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 1297.094553] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 [ 1297.095029] __lock_acquire+0x1740/0x3110 [ 1297.095510] lock_acquire+0xd8/0x490 [ 1297.095993] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.096476] start_transaction+0x3c5/0x760 [btrfs] [ 1297.096962] ? btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.097451] btrfs_quota_enable+0xaf/0xa70 [btrfs] [ 1297.097941] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x1f4d/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.098429] btrfs_ioctl+0x2c60/0x36f0 [btrfs] [ 1297.098904] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x20c/0x430 [ 1297.099382] ? kvm_clock_read+0x14/0x30 [ 1297.099854] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0x10 [ 1297.100328] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [ 1297.100801] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x12/0x180 [ 1297.101272] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.101739] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 1297.102207] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1297.102673] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1297.103148] RIP: 0033:0x7f773ff65d87 This is because during the quota enable ioctl we lock first the mutex qgroup_ioctl_lock and then start a transaction, and starting a transaction acquires a fs freeze semaphore (at the VFS level). However, every other code path, except for the quota disable ioctl path, we do the opposite: we start a transaction and then lock the mutex. So fix this by making the quota enable and disable paths to start the transaction without having the mutex locked, and then, after starting the transaction, lock the mutex and check if some other task already enabled or disabled the quotas, bailing with success if that was the case. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
…nts' Koichiro Den says: ==================== virtio_net: correct netdev_tx_reset_queue() invocation points When virtnet_close is followed by virtnet_open, some TX completions can possibly remain unconsumed, until they are finally processed during the first NAPI poll after the netdev_tx_reset_queue(), resulting in a crash [1]. Commit b96ed2c ("virtio_net: move netdev_tx_reset_queue() call before RX napi enable") was not sufficient to eliminate all BQL crash scenarios for virtio-net. This issue can be reproduced with the latest net-next master by running: `while :; do ip l set DEV down; ip l set DEV up; done` under heavy network TX load from inside the machine. This patch series resolves the issue and also addresses similar existing problems: (a). Drop netdev_tx_reset_queue() from open/close path. This eliminates the BQL crashes due to the problematic open/close path. (b). As a result of (a), netdev_tx_reset_queue() is now explicitly required in freeze/restore path. Add netdev_tx_reset_queue() immediately after free_unused_bufs() invocation. (c). Fix missing resetting in virtnet_tx_resize(). virtnet_tx_resize() has lacked proper resetting since commit c8bd1f7 ("virtio_net: add support for Byte Queue Limits"). (d). Fix missing resetting in the XDP_SETUP_XSK_POOL path. Similar to (c), this path lacked proper resetting. Call netdev_tx_reset_queue() when virtqueue_reset() has actually recycled unused buffers. This patch series consists of six commits: [1/6]: Resolves (a) and (b). # also -stable 6.11.y [2/6]: Minor fix to make [4/6] streamlined. [3/6]: Prerequisite for (c). # also -stable 6.11.y [4/6]: Resolves (c) (incl. Prerequisite for (d)) # also -stable 6.11.y [5/6]: Preresuisite for (d). [6/6]: Resolves (d). Changes for v4: - move netdev_tx_reset_queue() out of free_unused_bufs() - submit to net, not net-next Changes for v3: - replace 'flushed' argument with 'recycle_done' Changes for v2: - add tx queue resetting for (b) to (d) above v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ [1]: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at lib/dynamic_queue_limits.c:99! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1598 Comm: ip Tainted: G N 6.12.0net-next_main+ #2 Tainted: [N]=TEST Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), \ BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:dql_completed+0x26b/0x290 Code: b7 c2 49 89 e9 44 89 da 89 c6 4c 89 d7 e8 ed 17 47 00 58 65 ff 0d 4d 27 90 7e 0f 85 fd fe ff ff e8 ea 53 8d ff e9 f3 fe ff ff <0f> 0b 01 d2 44 89 d1 29 d1 ba 00 00 00 00 0f 48 ca e9 28 ff ff ff RSP: 0018:ffffc900002b0d08 EFLAGS: 00010297 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888102398c80 RCX: 0000000080190009 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000006a RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff888102398c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000000ca R11: 0000000000015681 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: ffffc900002b0d68 R14: ffff88811115e000 R15: ffff8881107aca40 FS: 00007f41ded69500(0000) GS:ffff888667dc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000556ccc2dc1a0 CR3: 0000000104fd8003 CR4: 0000000000772ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <IRQ> ? die+0x32/0x80 ? do_trap+0xd9/0x100 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290 ? do_error_trap+0x6d/0xb0 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290 ? exc_invalid_op+0x4c/0x60 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 ? dql_completed+0x26b/0x290 __free_old_xmit+0xff/0x170 [virtio_net] free_old_xmit+0x54/0xc0 [virtio_net] virtnet_poll+0xf4/0xe30 [virtio_net] ? __update_load_avg_cfs_rq+0x264/0x2d0 ? update_curr+0x35/0x260 ? reweight_entity+0x1be/0x260 __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x28/0x1c0 net_rx_action+0x329/0x420 ? enqueue_hrtimer+0x35/0x90 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1d/0x80 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0xd/0x20 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0xd/0x20 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd/0x1a0 handle_softirqs+0x138/0x3e0 do_softirq.part.0+0x89/0xc0 </IRQ> <TASK> __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa7/0xb0 virtnet_open+0xc8/0x310 [virtio_net] __dev_open+0xfa/0x1b0 __dev_change_flags+0x1de/0x250 dev_change_flags+0x22/0x60 do_setlink.isra.0+0x2df/0x10b0 ? rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x34f/0x3f0 ? netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 ? netlink_unicast+0x23e/0x390 ? netlink_sendmsg+0x21e/0x490 ? ____sys_sendmsg+0x31b/0x350 ? avc_has_perm_noaudit+0x67/0xf0 ? cred_has_capability.isra.0+0x75/0x110 ? __nla_validate_parse+0x5f/0xee0 ? __pfx___probestub_irq_enable+0x3/0x10 ? __create_object+0x5e/0x90 ? security_capable+0x3b/0x7�[I0 rtnl_newlink+0x784/0xaf0 ? avc_has_perm_noaudit+0x67/0xf0 ? cred_has_capability.isra.0+0x75/0x110 ? stack_depot_save_flags+0x24/0x6d0 ? __pfx_rtnl_newlink+0x10/0x10 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x34f/0x3f0 ? do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x180 ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 netlink_unicast+0x23e/0x390 netlink_sendmsg+0x21e/0x490 ____sys_sendmsg+0x31b/0x350 ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x6d/0xa0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x86/0xd0 ? __pte_offset_map+0x17/0x160 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x147/0x610 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0 ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0 ? _raw_spin_trylock+0x13/0x60 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1d/0x80 __sys_sendmsg+0x66/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f41defe5b34 Code: 15 e1 12 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bf 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 80 3d 35 95 0f 00 00 74 13 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 4c c3 0f 1f 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 20 89 55 RSP: 002b:00007ffe5336ecc8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f41defe5b34 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffe5336ed30 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffe5336eda0 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 00007ffe5336f6f9 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000003 R13: 0000000067452259 R14: 0000556ccc28b040 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> [...] ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
…ux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.13, part #2 - Fix confusion with implicitly-shifted MDCR_EL2 masks breaking SPE/TRBE initialization - Align nested page table walker with the intended memory attribute combining rules of the architecture - Prevent userspace from constraining the advertised ASID width, avoiding horrors of guest TLBIs not matching the intended context in hardware - Don't leak references on LPIs when insertion into the translation cache fails
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
The vmemmap's, which is used for RV64 with SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, page tables are populated using pmd (page middle directory) hugetables. However, the pmd allocation is not using the generic mechanism used by the VMA code (e.g. pmd_alloc()), or the RISC-V specific create_pgd_mapping()/alloc_pmd_late(). Instead, the vmemmap page table code allocates a page, and calls vmemmap_set_pmd(). This results in that the pmd ctor is *not* called, nor would it make sense to do so. Now, when tearing down a vmemmap page table pmd, the cleanup code would unconditionally, and incorrectly call the pmd dtor, which results in a crash (best case). This issue was found when running the HMM selftests: | tools/testing/selftests/mm# ./test_hmm.sh smoke | ... # when unloading the test_hmm.ko module | page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x10915b | flags: 0x1000000000000000(node=0|zone=1) | raw: 1000000000000000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000 | raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 | page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(ptdesc->pmd_huge_pte) | ------------[ cut here ]------------ | kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:3080! | Kernel BUG [#1] | Modules linked in: test_hmm(-) sch_fq_codel fuse drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks backlight dm_mod | CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 514 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 6.12.0-00982-gf2a4f1682d07 #2 | Tainted: [W]=WARN | Hardware name: riscv-virtio qemu/qemu, BIOS 2024.10 10/01/2024 | epc : remove_pgd_mapping+0xbec/0x1070 | ra : remove_pgd_mapping+0xbec/0x1070 | epc : ffffffff80010a68 ra : ffffffff80010a68 sp : ff20000000a73940 | gp : ffffffff827b2d88 tp : ff6000008785da40 t0 : ffffffff80fbce04 | t1 : 0720072007200720 t2 : 706d756420656761 s0 : ff20000000a73a50 | s1 : ff6000008915cff8 a0 : 0000000000000039 a1 : 0000000000000008 | a2 : ff600003fff0de20 a3 : 0000000000000000 a4 : 0000000000000000 | a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : c0000000ffffefff a7 : ffffffff824469b8 | s2 : ff1c0000022456c0 s3 : ff1ffffffdbfffff s4 : ff6000008915c000 | s5 : ff6000008915c000 s6 : ff6000008915c000 s7 : ff1ffffffdc00000 | s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : ff1ffffffdc00000 s10: ffffffff819a31f0 | s11: ffffffffffffffff t3 : ffffffff8000c950 t4 : ff60000080244f00 | t5 : ff60000080244000 t6 : ff20000000a73708 | status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffff80010a68 cause: 0000000000000003 | [<ffffffff80010a68>] remove_pgd_mapping+0xbec/0x1070 | [<ffffffff80fd238e>] vmemmap_free+0x14/0x1e | [<ffffffff8032e698>] section_deactivate+0x220/0x452 | [<ffffffff8032ef7e>] sparse_remove_section+0x4a/0x58 | [<ffffffff802f8700>] __remove_pages+0x7e/0xba | [<ffffffff803760d8>] memunmap_pages+0x2bc/0x3fe | [<ffffffff02a3ca28>] dmirror_device_remove_chunks+0x2ea/0x518 [test_hmm] | [<ffffffff02a3e026>] hmm_dmirror_exit+0x3e/0x1018 [test_hmm] | [<ffffffff80102c14>] __riscv_sys_delete_module+0x15a/0x2a6 | [<ffffffff80fd020c>] do_trap_ecall_u+0x1f2/0x266 | [<ffffffff80fde0a2>] _new_vmalloc_restore_context_a0+0xc6/0xd2 | Code: bf51 7597 0184 8593 76a5 854a 4097 0029 80e7 2c00 (9002) 7597 | ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- | Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt Add a check to avoid calling the pmd dtor, if the calling context is vmemmap_free(). Fixes: c75a74f ("riscv: mm: Add memory hotplugging support") Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
This reworks hci_cb_list to not use mutex hci_cb_list_lock to avoid bugs
like the bellow:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:585
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 5070, name: kworker/u9:2
preempt_count: 0, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 0
4 locks held by kworker/u9:2/5070:
#0: ffff888015be3948 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3229 [inline]
#0: ffff888015be3948 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x8e0/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
#1: ffffc90003b6fd00 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3230 [inline]
#1: ffffc90003b6fd00 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x91b/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
#2: ffff8880665d0078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0xcf/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6914
#3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:298 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:750 [inline]
#3: ffffffff8e132020 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0xdb/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6915
CPU: 0 PID: 5070 Comm: kworker/u9:2 Not tainted 6.8.0-syzkaller-08073-g480e035fc4c7 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Workqueue: hci0 hci_rx_work
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
__might_resched+0x5d4/0x780 kernel/sched/core.c:10187
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0xc1/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
hci_connect_cfm include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h:2004 [inline]
hci_le_create_big_complete_evt+0x3d9/0xae0 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:6939
hci_event_func net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7514 [inline]
hci_event_packet+0xa53/0x1540 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:7569
hci_rx_work+0x3e8/0xca0 net/bluetooth/hci_core.c:4171
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa00/0x1770 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:243
</TASK>
Reported-by: [email protected]
Tested-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2fb0835e0c9cefc34614
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
This fixes the circular locking dependency warning below, by releasing the socket lock before enterning iso_listen_bis, to avoid any potential deadlock with hdev lock. [ 75.307983] ====================================================== [ 75.307984] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 75.307985] 6.12.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted [ 75.307987] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 75.307987] kworker/u81:2/2623 is trying to acquire lock: [ 75.307988] ffff8fde1769da58 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO) at: iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth] [ 75.308021] but task is already holding lock: [ 75.308022] ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock) at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308053] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 75.308054] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 75.308055] -> #1 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 75.308057] __mutex_lock+0xad/0xc50 [ 75.308061] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 75.308063] iso_sock_listen+0x143/0x5c0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308085] __sys_listen_socket+0x49/0x60 [ 75.308088] __x64_sys_listen+0x4c/0x90 [ 75.308090] x64_sys_call+0x2517/0x25f0 [ 75.308092] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150 [ 75.308095] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 75.308098] -> #0 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 75.308100] __lock_acquire+0x155e/0x25f0 [ 75.308103] lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300 [ 75.308105] lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x90 [ 75.308107] iso_connect_cfm+0x253/0x840 [bluetooth] [ 75.308128] hci_connect_cfm+0x6c/0x190 [bluetooth] [ 75.308155] hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x27b/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308180] hci_le_meta_evt+0xe7/0x200 [bluetooth] [ 75.308206] hci_event_packet+0x21f/0x5c0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308230] hci_rx_work+0x3ae/0xb10 [bluetooth] [ 75.308254] process_one_work+0x212/0x740 [ 75.308256] worker_thread+0x1bd/0x3a0 [ 75.308258] kthread+0xe4/0x120 [ 75.308259] ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 [ 75.308261] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 75.308263] other info that might help us debug this: [ 75.308264] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 75.308264] CPU0 CPU1 [ 75.308265] ---- ---- [ 75.308265] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 75.308267] lock(sk_lock- AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO); [ 75.308268] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 75.308269] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO); [ 75.308270] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 75.308271] 4 locks held by kworker/u81:2/2623: [ 75.308272] #0: ffff8fdd66e52148 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0x740 [ 75.308276] #1: ffffafb488b7fe48 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)), at: process_one_work+0x1ce/0x740 [ 75.308280] #2: ffff8fdd61a10078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3} at: hci_le_per_adv_report_evt+0x47/0x2f0 [bluetooth] [ 75.308304] #3: ffffffffb6ba4900 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: hci_connect_cfm+0x29/0x190 [bluetooth] Fixes: 02171da ("Bluetooth: ISO: Add hcon for listening bis sk") Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
This fixes the circular locking dependency warning below, by reworking iso_sock_recvmsg, to ensure that the socket lock is always released before calling a function that locks hdev. [ 561.670344] ====================================================== [ 561.670346] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 561.670349] 6.12.0-rc6+ #26 Not tainted [ 561.670351] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 561.670353] iso-tester/3289 is trying to acquire lock: [ 561.670355] ffff88811f600078 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iso_conn_big_sync+0x73/0x260 [bluetooth] [ 561.670405] but task is already holding lock: [ 561.670407] ffff88815af58258 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: iso_sock_recvmsg+0xbf/0x500 [bluetooth] [ 561.670450] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 561.670452] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 561.670453] -> #2 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 561.670458] lock_acquire+0x7c/0xc0 [ 561.670463] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0 [ 561.670467] bt_accept_dequeue+0x1a5/0x4d0 [bluetooth] [ 561.670510] iso_sock_accept+0x271/0x830 [bluetooth] [ 561.670547] do_accept+0x3dd/0x610 [ 561.670550] __sys_accept4+0xd8/0x170 [ 561.670553] __x64_sys_accept+0x74/0xc0 [ 561.670556] x64_sys_call+0x17d6/0x25f0 [ 561.670559] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150 [ 561.670563] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 561.670567] -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 561.670571] lock_acquire+0x7c/0xc0 [ 561.670574] lock_sock_nested+0x3b/0xf0 [ 561.670577] iso_sock_listen+0x2de/0xf30 [bluetooth] [ 561.670617] __sys_listen_socket+0xef/0x130 [ 561.670620] __x64_sys_listen+0xe1/0x190 [ 561.670623] x64_sys_call+0x2517/0x25f0 [ 561.670626] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150 [ 561.670629] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 561.670632] -> #0 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 561.670636] __lock_acquire+0x32ad/0x6ab0 [ 561.670639] lock_acquire.part.0+0x118/0x360 [ 561.670642] lock_acquire+0x7c/0xc0 [ 561.670644] __mutex_lock+0x18d/0x12f0 [ 561.670647] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 561.670651] iso_conn_big_sync+0x73/0x260 [bluetooth] [ 561.670687] iso_sock_recvmsg+0x3e9/0x500 [bluetooth] [ 561.670722] sock_recvmsg+0x1d5/0x240 [ 561.670725] sock_read_iter+0x27d/0x470 [ 561.670727] vfs_read+0x9a0/0xd30 [ 561.670731] ksys_read+0x1a8/0x250 [ 561.670733] __x64_sys_read+0x72/0xc0 [ 561.670736] x64_sys_call+0x1b12/0x25f0 [ 561.670738] do_syscall_64+0x87/0x150 [ 561.670741] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 561.670744] other info that might help us debug this: [ 561.670745] Chain exists of: &hdev->lock --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO --> sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH [ 561.670751] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 561.670753] CPU0 CPU1 [ 561.670754] ---- ---- [ 561.670756] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH); [ 561.670758] lock(sk_lock AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_ISO); [ 561.670761] lock(sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH); [ 561.670764] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 561.670767] *** DEADLOCK *** Fixes: 07a9342 ("Bluetooth: ISO: Send BIG Create Sync via hci_sync") Signed-off-by: Iulia Tanasescu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
Aishwarya reports that warnings are sometimes seen when running the ftrace kselftests, e.g. | WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 2066 at arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:141 arch_stack_walk+0x4a0/0x4c0 | Modules linked in: | CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 2066 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2 #2 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | pstate: 604000c5 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) | pc : arch_stack_walk+0x4a0/0x4c0 | lr : arch_stack_walk+0x248/0x4c0 | sp : ffff800083643d20 | x29: ffff800083643dd0 x28: ffff00007b891400 x27: ffff00007b891928 | x26: 0000000000000001 x25: 00000000000000c0 x24: ffff800082f39d80 | x23: ffff80008003ee8c x22: ffff80008004baa8 x21: ffff8000800533e0 | x20: ffff800083643e10 x19: ffff80008003eec8 x18: 0000000000000000 | x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff800083640000 x15: 0000000000000000 | x14: 02a37a802bbb8a92 x13: 00000000000001a9 x12: 0000000000000001 | x11: ffff800082ffad60 x10: ffff800083643d20 x9 : ffff80008003eed0 | x8 : ffff80008004baa8 x7 : ffff800086f2be80 x6 : ffff0000057cf000 | x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff800086f2b690 | x2 : ffff80008004baa8 x1 : ffff80008004baa8 x0 : ffff80008004baa8 | Call trace: | arch_stack_walk+0x4a0/0x4c0 (P) | arch_stack_walk+0x248/0x4c0 (L) | profile_pc+0x44/0x80 | profile_tick+0x50/0x80 (F) | tick_nohz_handler+0xcc/0x160 (F) | __hrtimer_run_queues+0x2ac/0x340 (F) | hrtimer_interrupt+0xf4/0x268 (F) | arch_timer_handler_virt+0x34/0x60 (F) | handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x88/0x220 (F) | generic_handle_domain_irq+0x34/0x60 (F) | gic_handle_irq+0x54/0x140 (F) | call_on_irq_stack+0x24/0x58 (F) | do_interrupt_handler+0x88/0x98 | el1_interrupt+0x34/0x68 (F) | el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x28 | el1h_64_irq+0x6c/0x70 | queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x78/0x460 (P) The warning in question is: WARN_ON_ONCE(state->common.pc == orig_pc)) ... in kunwind_recover_return_address(), which is triggered when return_to_handler() is encountered in the trace, but ftrace_graph_ret_addr() cannot find a corresponding original return address on the fgraph return stack. This happens because the stacktrace code encounters an exception boundary where the LR was not live at the time of the exception, but the LR happens to contain return_to_handler(); either because the task recently returned there, or due to unfortunate usage of the LR at a scratch register. In such cases attempts to recover the return address via ftrace_graph_ret_addr() may fail, triggering the WARN_ON_ONCE() above and aborting the unwind (hence the stacktrace terminating after reporting the PC at the time of the exception). Handling unreliable LR values in these cases is likely to require some larger rework, so for the moment avoid this problem by restoring the old behaviour of skipping the LR at exception boundaries, which the stacktrace code did prior to commit: c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries") This commit is effectively a partial revert, keeping the structures and logic to explicitly identify exception boundaries while still skipping reporting of the LR. The logic to explicitly identify exception boundaries is still useful for general robustness and as a building block for future support for RELIABLE_STACKTRACE. Fixes: c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries") Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Reported-by: Aishwarya TCV <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
The arm64 stacktrace code has a few error conditions where a
WARN_ON_ONCE() is triggered before the stacktrace is terminated and an
error is returned to the caller. The conditions shouldn't be triggered
when unwinding the current task, but it is possible to trigger these
when unwinding another task which is not blocked, as the stack of that
task is concurrently modified. Kent reports that these warnings can be
triggered while running filesystem tests on bcachefs, which calls the
stacktrace code directly.
To produce a meaningful stacktrace of another task, the task in question
should be blocked, but the stacktrace code is expected to be robust to
cases where it is not blocked. Note that this is purely about not
unuduly scaring the user and/or crashing the kernel; stacktraces in such
cases are meaningless and may leak kernel secrets from the stack of the
task being unwound.
Ideally we'd pin the task in a blocked state during the unwind, as we do
for /proc/${PID}/wchan since commit:
42a20f8 ("sched: Add wrapper for get_wchan() to keep task blocked")
... but a bunch of places don't do that, notably /proc/${PID}/stack,
where we don't pin the task in a blocked state, but do restrict the
output to privileged users since commit:
f8a00ce ("proc: restrict kernel stack dumps to root")
... and so it's possible to trigger these warnings accidentally, e.g. by
reading /proc/*/stack (as root):
| for n in $(seq 1 10); do
| while true; do cat /proc/*/stack > /dev/null 2>&1; done &
| done
| ------------[ cut here ]------------
| WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 166 at arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:207 arch_stack_walk+0x1c8/0x370
| Modules linked in:
| CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 166 Comm: cat Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00003-g3dafa7a7925d #2
| Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
| pstate: 81400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
| pc : arch_stack_walk+0x1c8/0x370
| lr : arch_stack_walk+0x1b0/0x370
| sp : ffff800080773890
| x29: ffff800080773930 x28: fff0000005c44500 x27: fff00000058fa038
| x26: 000000007ffff000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
| x23: ffffa35a8d9600ec x22: 0000000000000000 x21: fff00000043a33c0
| x20: ffff800080773970 x19: ffffa35a8d960168 x18: 0000000000000000
| x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
| x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
| x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : 0000000000000000
| x8 : ffff8000807738e0 x7 : ffff8000806e3800 x6 : ffff8000806e3818
| x5 : ffff800080773920 x4 : ffff8000806e4000 x3 : ffff8000807738e0
| x2 : 0000000000000018 x1 : ffff8000806e3800 x0 : 0000000000000000
| Call trace:
| arch_stack_walk+0x1c8/0x370 (P)
| stack_trace_save_tsk+0x8c/0x108
| proc_pid_stack+0xb0/0x134
| proc_single_show+0x60/0x120
| seq_read_iter+0x104/0x438
| seq_read+0xf8/0x140
| vfs_read+0xc4/0x31c
| ksys_read+0x70/0x108
| __arm64_sys_read+0x1c/0x28
| invoke_syscall+0x48/0x104
| el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
| do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
| el0_svc+0x30/0xcc
| el0t_64_sync_handler+0x10c/0x138
| el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c
| ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fix this by only warning when unwinding the current task. When unwinding
another task the error conditions will be handled by returning an error
without producing a warning.
The two warnings in kunwind_next_frame_record_meta() were added recently
as part of commit:
c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries")
The warning when recovering the fgraph return address has changed form
many times, but was originally introduced back in commit:
9f41631 ("arm64: fix unwind_frame() for filtered out fn for function graph tracing")
Fixes: c2c6b27 ("arm64: stacktrace: unwind exception boundaries")
Fixes: 9f41631 ("arm64: fix unwind_frame() for filtered out fn for function graph tracing")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
The current implementation removes cache tags after disabling ATS, leading to potential memory leaks and kernel crashes. Specifically, CACHE_TAG_DEVTLB type cache tags may still remain in the list even after the domain is freed, causing a use-after-free condition. This issue really shows up when multiple VFs from different PFs passed through to a single user-space process via vfio-pci. In such cases, the kernel may crash with kernel messages like: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000014 PGD 19036a067 P4D 1940a3067 PUD 136c9b067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 74 UID: 0 PID: 3183 Comm: testCli Not tainted 6.11.9 #2 RIP: 0010:cache_tag_flush_range+0x9b/0x250 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x1f/0x60 ? page_fault_oops+0x163/0x590 ? exc_page_fault+0x72/0x190 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? cache_tag_flush_range+0x9b/0x250 ? cache_tag_flush_range+0x5d/0x250 intel_iommu_tlb_sync+0x29/0x40 intel_iommu_unmap_pages+0xfe/0x160 __iommu_unmap+0xd8/0x1a0 vfio_unmap_unpin+0x182/0x340 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_remove_dma+0x2a/0xb0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xafa/0x18e0 [vfio_iommu_type1] Move cache_tag_unassign_domain() before iommu_disable_pci_caps() to fix it. Fixes: 3b1d9e2 ("iommu/vt-d: Add cache tag assignment interface") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
ojeda
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
…s_lock For storing a value to a queue attribute, the queue_attr_store function first freezes the queue (->q_usage_counter(io)) and then acquire ->sysfs_lock. This seems not correct as the usual ordering should be to acquire ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue. This incorrect ordering causes the following lockdep splat which we are able to reproduce always simply by accessing /sys/kernel/debug file using ls command: [ 57.597146] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 57.597154] 6.12.0-10553-gb86545e02e8c #20 Tainted: G W [ 57.597162] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 57.597168] ls/4605 is trying to acquire lock: [ 57.597176] c00000003eb56710 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: __might_fault+0x58/0xc0 [ 57.597200] but task is already holding lock: [ 57.597207] c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4 [ 57.597226] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 57.597233] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 57.597241] -> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}: [ 57.597255] down_write+0x6c/0x18c [ 57.597264] start_creating+0xb4/0x24c [ 57.597274] debugfs_create_dir+0x2c/0x1e8 [ 57.597283] blk_register_queue+0xec/0x294 [ 57.597292] add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548 [ 57.597302] brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338 [ 57.597309] brd_init+0x100/0x178 [ 57.597317] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4 [ 57.597326] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0 [ 57.597334] kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc [ 57.597342] ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c [ 57.597350] -> #4 (&q->debugfs_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 57.597362] __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0 [ 57.597370] blk_register_queue+0xd4/0x294 [ 57.597379] add_disk_fwnode+0x2e4/0x548 [ 57.597388] brd_alloc+0x2c8/0x338 [ 57.597395] brd_init+0x100/0x178 [ 57.597402] do_one_initcall+0x88/0x3e4 [ 57.597410] kernel_init_freeable+0x3cc/0x6e0 [ 57.597418] kernel_init+0x34/0x1cc [ 57.597426] ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c [ 57.597434] -> #3 (&q->sysfs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 57.597446] __mutex_lock+0xfc/0x12a0 [ 57.597454] queue_attr_store+0x9c/0x110 [ 57.597462] sysfs_kf_write+0x70/0xb0 [ 57.597471] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1b0/0x2ac [ 57.597480] vfs_write+0x3dc/0x6e8 [ 57.597488] ksys_write+0x84/0x140 [ 57.597495] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597504] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597516] -> #2 (&q->q_usage_counter(io)#21){++++}-{0:0}: [ 57.597530] __submit_bio+0x5ec/0x828 [ 57.597538] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x1e4/0x4f0 [ 57.597547] iomap_readahead+0x2a0/0x448 [ 57.597556] xfs_vm_readahead+0x28/0x3c [ 57.597564] read_pages+0x88/0x41c [ 57.597571] page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x1ac/0x2d8 [ 57.597580] filemap_get_pages+0x188/0x984 [ 57.597588] filemap_read+0x13c/0x4bc [ 57.597596] xfs_file_buffered_read+0x88/0x17c [ 57.597605] xfs_file_read_iter+0xac/0x158 [ 57.597614] vfs_read+0x2d4/0x3b4 [ 57.597622] ksys_read+0x84/0x144 [ 57.597629] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597637] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597647] -> #1 (mapping.invalidate_lock#2){++++}-{4:4}: [ 57.597661] down_read+0x6c/0x220 [ 57.597669] filemap_fault+0x870/0x100c [ 57.597677] xfs_filemap_fault+0xc4/0x18c [ 57.597684] __do_fault+0x64/0x164 [ 57.597693] __handle_mm_fault+0x1274/0x1dac [ 57.597702] handle_mm_fault+0x248/0x484 [ 57.597711] ___do_page_fault+0x428/0xc0c [ 57.597719] hash__do_page_fault+0x30/0x68 [ 57.597727] do_hash_fault+0x90/0x35c [ 57.597736] data_access_common_virt+0x210/0x220 [ 57.597745] _copy_from_user+0xf8/0x19c [ 57.597754] sel_write_load+0x178/0xd54 [ 57.597762] vfs_write+0x108/0x6e8 [ 57.597769] ksys_write+0x84/0x140 [ 57.597777] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597785] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597794] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}: [ 57.597806] __lock_acquire+0x17cc/0x2330 [ 57.597814] lock_acquire+0x138/0x400 [ 57.597822] __might_fault+0x7c/0xc0 [ 57.597830] filldir64+0xe8/0x390 [ 57.597839] dcache_readdir+0x80/0x2d4 [ 57.597846] iterate_dir+0xd8/0x1d4 [ 57.597855] sys_getdents64+0x88/0x2d4 [ 57.597864] system_call_exception+0x130/0x360 [ 57.597872] system_call_common+0x160/0x2c4 [ 57.597881] other info that might help us debug this: [ 57.597888] Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock --> &q->debugfs_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 [ 57.597905] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 57.597911] CPU0 CPU1 [ 57.597917] ---- ---- [ 57.597922] rlock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3); [ 57.597932] lock(&q->debugfs_mutex); [ 57.597940] lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3); [ 57.597950] rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); [ 57.597958] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 57.597965] 2 locks held by ls/4605: [ 57.597971] #0: c0000000137c12f8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: fdget_pos+0xcc/0x154 [ 57.597989] #1: c0000018e27c6810 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: iterate_dir+0x94/0x1d4 Prevent the above lockdep warning by acquiring ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue while storing a queue attribute in queue_attr_store function. Later, we also found[1] another function __blk_mq_update_nr_ hw_queues where we first freeze queue and then acquire the ->sysfs_lock. So we've also updated lock ordering in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues function and ensured that in all code paths we follow the correct lock ordering i.e. acquire ->sysfs_lock before freezing the queue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAFj5m9Ke8+EHKQBs_Nk6hqd=LGXtk4mUxZUN5==ZcCjnZSBwHw@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: af28141 ("block: freeze the queue in queue_attr_store") Tested-by: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
metaspace
pushed a commit
to metaspace/linux
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit 953e549 ] Lockdep gives a false positive splat as it can't distinguish the lock which is taken by different IRQ descriptors from different IRQ chips that are organized in a way of a hierarchy: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.12.0-rc5-next-20241101-00148-g9fabf8160b53 Rust-for-Linux#562 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------ modprobe/141 is trying to acquire lock: ffff899446947868 (intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: regmap_update_bits_base+0x33/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff899446947c68 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x682/0x790 which lock already depends on the new lock. -> Rust-for-Linux#3 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: -> Rust-for-Linux#2 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: -> #1 (ipclock){+.+.}-{4:4}: -> #0 (intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: Chain exists of: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock --> &desc->request_mutex --> &d->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&d->lock); lock(&desc->request_mutex); lock(&d->lock); lock(intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc:502:(&bxtwc_regmap_config)->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by modprobe/141: #0: ffff8994419368f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __driver_attach+0xf6/0x250 #1: ffff89944690b250 (&desc->request_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x1a2/0x790 Rust-for-Linux#2: ffff899446947c68 (&d->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0x682/0x790 Set a lockdep class when we map the IRQ so that it doesn't warn about a lockdep bug that doesn't exist. Fixes: 4af8be6 ("regmap: Convert regmap_irq to use irq_domain") Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
metaspace
pushed a commit
to metaspace/linux
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit 06dbbb4 ] copy_from_kernel_nofault() can be called when doing read of /proc/kcore. /proc/kcore can have some unmapped kfence objects which when read via copy_from_kernel_nofault() can cause page faults. Since *_nofault() functions define their own fixup table for handling fault, use that instead of asking kfence to handle such faults. Hence we search the exception tables for the nip which generated the fault. If there is an entry then we let the fixup table handler handle the page fault by returning an error from within ___do_page_fault(). This can be easily triggered if someone tries to do dd from /proc/kcore. eg. dd if=/proc/kcore of=/dev/null bs=1M Some example false negatives: =============================== BUG: KFENCE: invalid read in copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0 Invalid read at 0xc0000000fdff0000: copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0 0xc00000000665f950 read_kcore_iter+0x57c/0xa04 proc_reg_read_iter+0xe4/0x16c vfs_read+0x320/0x3ec ksys_read+0x90/0x154 system_call_exception+0x120/0x310 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec BUG: KFENCE: use-after-free read in copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0 Use-after-free read at 0xc0000000fe050000 (in kfence-Rust-for-Linux#2): copy_from_kernel_nofault+0x9c/0x1a0 0xc00000000665f950 read_kcore_iter+0x57c/0xa04 proc_reg_read_iter+0xe4/0x16c vfs_read+0x320/0x3ec ksys_read+0x90/0x154 system_call_exception+0x120/0x310 system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec Fixes: 90cbac0 ("powerpc: Enable KFENCE for PPC32") Suggested-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Reported-by: Disha Goel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/a411788081d50e3b136c6270471e35aba3dfafa3.1729271995.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
metaspace
pushed a commit
to metaspace/linux
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit cadae3a ] The dtl_access_lock needs to be a rw_sempahore, a sleeping lock, because the code calls kmalloc() while holding it, which can sleep: # echo 1 > /proc/powerpc/vcpudispatch_stats BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched/mm.h:337 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 199, name: sh preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 3 locks held by sh/199: #0: c00000000a0743f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x324/0x438 #1: c0000000028c7058 (dtl_enable_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vcpudispatch_stats_write+0xd4/0x5f4 Rust-for-Linux#2: c0000000028c70b8 (dtl_access_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: vcpudispatch_stats_write+0x220/0x5f4 CPU: 0 PID: 199 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.10.0-rc4 Rust-for-Linux#152 Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER9 (raw) 0x4e1202 0xf000005 of:SLOF,HEAD hv:linux,kvm pSeries Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x130/0x148 (unreliable) __might_resched+0x174/0x410 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x340/0x3d0 alloc_dtl_buffers+0x124/0x1ac vcpudispatch_stats_write+0x2a8/0x5f4 proc_reg_write+0xf4/0x150 vfs_write+0xfc/0x438 ksys_write+0x88/0x148 system_call_exception+0x1c4/0x5a0 system_call_common+0xf4/0x258 Fixes: 06220d7 ("powerpc/pseries: Introduce rwlock to gatekeep DTLB usage") Tested-by: Kajol Jain <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nysal Jan K.A <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
metaspace
pushed a commit
to metaspace/linux
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2024
[ Upstream commit f10a890 ] syzbot reports deadlock issue of f2fs as below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline] ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068 but task is already holding lock: ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> Rust-for-Linux#2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline] sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899 f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline] prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963 super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223 do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662 shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline] shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline] balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline] kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline] prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722 alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265 alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline] folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352 filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010 do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787 read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline] f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032 f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079 f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174 f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline] __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723 writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779 sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849 f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941 __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline] f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068 f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174 f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline] prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963 super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223 do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662 shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline] shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline] balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline] kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(sb_internal#2); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(&sbi->sb_lock); Root cause is there will be potential deadlock in between below tasks: Thread A Kswapd - f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write - mnt_want_write_file -- down_read lock A - balance_pgdat - __fs_reclaim_acquire -- lock B - shrink_node - prune_icache_sb - dispose_list - f2fs_evict_inode - sb_start_intwrite -- down_read lock A - f2fs_do_sync_file - f2fs_write_inode - f2fs_handle_critical_error - f2fs_record_stop_reason - f2fs_commit_super - read_mapping_folio - filemap_alloc_folio_noprof - fs_reclaim_acquire -- lock B Both threads try to acquire read lock of lock A, then its upcoming write lock grabber will trigger deadlock. Let's always create an asynchronous task in f2fs_handle_critical_error() rather than calling f2fs_record_stop_reason() synchronously to avoid this potential deadlock issue. Fixes: b62e71b ("f2fs: support errors=remount-ro|continue|panic mountoption") Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daejun Park <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
40 tasks
Darksonn
pushed a commit
to Darksonn/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
Guangguan Wang says: ==================== net: several fixes for smc v1 -> v2: rewrite patch Rust-for-Linux#2 suggested by Paolo. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Darksonn
pushed a commit
to Darksonn/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
The mapping VMA address is saved in VAS window struct when the paste address is mapped. This VMA address is used during migration to unmap the paste address if the window is active. The paste address mapping will be removed when the window is closed or with the munmap(). But the VMA address in the VAS window is not updated with munmap() which is causing invalid access during migration. The KASAN report shows: [16386.254991] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in reconfig_close_windows+0x1a0/0x4e8 [16386.255043] Read of size 8 at addr c00000014a819670 by task drmgr/696928 [16386.255096] CPU: 29 UID: 0 PID: 696928 Comm: drmgr Kdump: loaded Tainted: G B 6.11.0-rc5-nxgzip Rust-for-Linux#2 [16386.255128] Tainted: [B]=BAD_PAGE [16386.255148] Hardware name: IBM,9080-HEX Power11 (architected) 0x820200 0xf000007 of:IBM,FW1110.00 (NH1110_016) hv:phyp pSeries [16386.255181] Call Trace: [16386.255202] [c00000016b297660] [c0000000018ad0ac] dump_stack_lvl+0x84/0xe8 (unreliable) [16386.255246] [c00000016b297690] [c0000000006e8a90] print_report+0x19c/0x764 [16386.255285] [c00000016b297760] [c0000000006e9490] kasan_report+0x128/0x1f8 [16386.255309] [c00000016b297880] [c0000000006eb5c8] __asan_load8+0xac/0xe0 [16386.255326] [c00000016b2978a0] [c00000000013f898] reconfig_close_windows+0x1a0/0x4e8 [16386.255343] [c00000016b297990] [c000000000140e58] vas_migration_handler+0x3a4/0x3fc [16386.255368] [c00000016b297a90] [c000000000128848] pseries_migrate_partition+0x4c/0x4c4 ... [16386.256136] Allocated by task 696554 on cpu 31 at 16377.277618s: [16386.256149] kasan_save_stack+0x34/0x68 [16386.256163] kasan_save_track+0x34/0x80 [16386.256175] kasan_save_alloc_info+0x58/0x74 [16386.256196] __kasan_slab_alloc+0xb8/0xdc [16386.256209] kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x200/0x3d0 [16386.256225] vm_area_alloc+0x44/0x150 [16386.256245] mmap_region+0x214/0x10c4 [16386.256265] do_mmap+0x5fc/0x750 [16386.256277] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x14c/0x24c [16386.256292] ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x20c/0x348 [16386.256303] sys_mmap+0xd0/0x160 ... [16386.256350] Freed by task 0 on cpu 31 at 16386.204848s: [16386.256363] kasan_save_stack+0x34/0x68 [16386.256374] kasan_save_track+0x34/0x80 [16386.256384] kasan_save_free_info+0x64/0x10c [16386.256396] __kasan_slab_free+0x120/0x204 [16386.256415] kmem_cache_free+0x128/0x450 [16386.256428] vm_area_free_rcu_cb+0xa8/0xd8 [16386.256441] rcu_do_batch+0x2c8/0xcf0 [16386.256458] rcu_core+0x378/0x3c4 [16386.256473] handle_softirqs+0x20c/0x60c [16386.256495] do_softirq_own_stack+0x6c/0x88 [16386.256509] do_softirq_own_stack+0x58/0x88 [16386.256521] __irq_exit_rcu+0x1a4/0x20c [16386.256533] irq_exit+0x20/0x38 [16386.256544] interrupt_async_exit_prepare.constprop.0+0x18/0x2c ... [16386.256717] Last potentially related work creation: [16386.256729] kasan_save_stack+0x34/0x68 [16386.256741] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0xcc/0x12c [16386.256753] __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x94/0xd04 [16386.256766] vm_area_free+0x28/0x3c [16386.256778] remove_vma+0xf4/0x114 [16386.256797] do_vmi_align_munmap.constprop.0+0x684/0x870 [16386.256811] __vm_munmap+0xe0/0x1f8 [16386.256821] sys_munmap+0x54/0x6c [16386.256830] system_call_exception+0x1a0/0x4a0 [16386.256841] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec [16386.256868] The buggy address belongs to the object at c00000014a819670 which belongs to the cache vm_area_struct of size 168 [16386.256887] The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of freed 168-byte region [c00000014a819670, c00000014a819718) [16386.256915] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [16386.256928] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x14a81 [16386.256950] memcg:c0000000ba430001 [16386.256961] anon flags: 0x43ffff800000000(node=4|zone=0|lastcpupid=0x7ffff) [16386.256975] page_type: 0xfdffffff(slab) [16386.256990] raw: 043ffff800000000 c00000000501c080 0000000000000000 5deadbee00000001 [16386.257003] raw: 0000000000000000 00000000011a011a 00000001fdffffff c0000000ba430001 [16386.257018] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected This patch adds close() callback in vas_vm_ops vm_operations_struct which will be executed during munmap() before freeing VMA. The VMA address in the VAS window is set to NULL after holding the window mmap_mutex. Fixes: 37e6764 ("powerpc/pseries/vas: Add VAS migration handler") Signed-off-by: Haren Myneni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Darksonn
pushed a commit
to Darksonn/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
Access to genmask field in struct nft_set_ext results in unaligned atomic read: [ 72.130109] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff0000c2bb708c [ 72.131036] Mem abort info: [ 72.131213] ESR = 0x0000000096000021 [ 72.131446] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 72.132209] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 72.133216] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 72.134080] FSC = 0x21: alignment fault [ 72.135593] Data abort info: [ 72.137194] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000021, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 72.142351] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 72.145989] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 72.150115] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000237d27000 [ 72.154893] [ffff0000c2bb708c] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=180000023ffff403, pud=180000023f84b403, pmd=180000023f835403, +pte=0068000102bb7707 [ 72.163021] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000021 [Rust-for-Linux#1] SMP [...] [ 72.170041] CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 54 Comm: kworker/7:0 Tainted: G E 6.13.0-rc3+ Rust-for-Linux#2 [ 72.170509] Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 72.170720] Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS edk2-stable202302-for-qemu 03/01/2023 [ 72.171192] Workqueue: events_power_efficient nft_rhash_gc [nf_tables] [ 72.171552] pstate: 21400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 72.171915] pc : nft_rhash_gc+0x200/0x2d8 [nf_tables] [ 72.172166] lr : nft_rhash_gc+0x128/0x2d8 [nf_tables] [ 72.172546] sp : ffff800081f2bce0 [ 72.172724] x29: ffff800081f2bd40 x28: ffff0000c2bb708c x27: 0000000000000038 [ 72.173078] x26: ffff0000c6780ef0 x25: ffff0000c643df00 x24: ffff0000c6778f78 [ 72.173431] x23: 000000000000001a x22: ffff0000c4b1f000 x21: ffff0000c6780f78 [ 72.173782] x20: ffff0000c2bb70dc x19: ffff0000c2bb7080 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 72.174135] x17: ffff0000c0a4e1c0 x16: 0000000000003000 x15: 0000ac26d173b978 [ 72.174485] x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: 0000000000000030 x12: ffff0000c6780ef0 [ 72.174841] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: ffff800081f2bcf8 x9 : ffff0000c3000000 [ 72.175193] x8 : 00000000000004be x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 [ 72.175544] x5 : 0000000000000040 x4 : ffff0000c3000010 x3 : 0000000000000000 [ 72.175871] x2 : 0000000000003a98 x1 : ffff0000c2bb708c x0 : 0000000000000004 [ 72.176207] Call trace: [ 72.176316] nft_rhash_gc+0x200/0x2d8 [nf_tables] (P) [ 72.176653] process_one_work+0x178/0x3d0 [ 72.176831] worker_thread+0x200/0x3f0 [ 72.176995] kthread+0xe8/0xf8 [ 72.177130] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 72.177289] Code: 54fff984 d503201f d2800080 91003261 (f820303f) [ 72.177557] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Align struct nft_set_ext to word size to address this and documentation it. pahole reports that this increases the size of elements for rhash and pipapo in 8 bytes on x86_64. Fixes: 7ffc748 ("netfilter: nft_set_hash: skip duplicated elements pending gc run") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
Darksonn
pushed a commit
to Darksonn/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
syzbot reports that a recent fix causes nesting issues between the (now) raw timeoutlock and the eventfd locking: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f Rust-for-Linux#29 Not tainted ----------------------------- kworker/u32:0/68094 is trying to lock: ffff000014d7a520 (&ctx->wqh#2){..-.}-{3:3}, at: eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 6 locks held by kworker/u32:0/68094: #0: ffff0000c1d98148 ((wq_completion)iou_exit){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x4e8/0xfc0 Rust-for-Linux#1: ffff80008d927c78 ((work_completion)(&ctx->exit_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x53c/0xfc0 Rust-for-Linux#2: ffff0000c59bc3d8 (&ctx->completion_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x40/0x180 Rust-for-Linux#3: ffff0000c59bc358 (&ctx->timeout_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: io_kill_timeouts+0x48/0x180 Rust-for-Linux#4: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 Rust-for-Linux#5: ffff800085127aa0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x8/0x38 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 68094 Comm: kworker/u32:0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4-00080-g9828a4c0901f Rust-for-Linux#29 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) Workqueue: iou_exit io_ring_exit_work Call trace: show_stack+0x1c/0x30 (C) __dump_stack+0x24/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x80 dump_stack+0x14/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x19f8/0x60c8 lock_acquire+0x1a4/0x540 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x90/0xd0 eventfd_signal_mask+0x64/0x180 io_eventfd_signal+0x64/0x108 io_req_local_work_add+0x294/0x430 __io_req_task_work_add+0x1c0/0x270 io_kill_timeout+0x1f0/0x288 io_kill_timeouts+0xd4/0x180 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x2e8/0x388 io_ring_exit_work+0x150/0x550 process_one_work+0x5e8/0xfc0 worker_thread+0x7ec/0xc80 kthread+0x24c/0x300 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 because after the preempt-rt fix for the timeout lock nesting inside the io-wq lock, we now have the eventfd spinlock nesting inside the raw timeout spinlock. Rather than play whack-a-mole with other nesting on the timeout lock, split the deletion and killing of timeouts so queueing the task_work for the timeout cancelations can get done outside of the timeout lock. Reported-by: [email protected] Fixes: 020b40f ("io_uring: make ctx->timeout_lock a raw spinlock") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Darksonn
pushed a commit
to Darksonn/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
…le_direct_reclaim() The task sometimes continues looping in throttle_direct_reclaim() because allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) keeps returning false. #0 [ffff80002cb6f8d0] __switch_to at ffff8000080095ac Rust-for-Linux#1 [ffff80002cb6f900] __schedule at ffff800008abbd1c Rust-for-Linux#2 [ffff80002cb6f990] schedule at ffff800008abc50c Rust-for-Linux#3 [ffff80002cb6f9b0] throttle_direct_reclaim at ffff800008273550 Rust-for-Linux#4 [ffff80002cb6fa20] try_to_free_pages at ffff800008277b68 Rust-for-Linux#5 [ffff80002cb6fae0] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffff8000082c4660 Rust-for-Linux#6 [ffff80002cb6fc50] alloc_pages_vma at ffff8000082e4a98 Rust-for-Linux#7 [ffff80002cb6fca0] do_anonymous_page at ffff80000829f5a8 Rust-for-Linux#8 [ffff80002cb6fce0] __handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5974 Rust-for-Linux#9 [ffff80002cb6fd90] handle_mm_fault at ffff8000082a5bd4 At this point, the pgdat contains the following two zones: NODE: 4 ZONE: 0 ADDR: ffff00817fffe540 NAME: "DMA32" SIZE: 20480 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 11/28/45 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 359 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 18813 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 0 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 50 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 0 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 NODE: 4 ZONE: 1 ADDR: ffff00817fffec00 NAME: "Normal" SIZE: 8454144 PRESENT: 98304 MIN/LOW/HIGH: 68/166/264 VM_STAT: NR_FREE_PAGES: 146 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_ANON: 94668 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_ANON: 3 NR_ZONE_INACTIVE_FILE: 735 NR_ZONE_ACTIVE_FILE: 78 NR_ZONE_UNEVICTABLE: 0 NR_ZONE_WRITE_PENDING: 0 NR_MLOCK: 0 NR_BOUNCE: 0 NR_ZSPAGES: 0 NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES: 0 In allow_direct_reclaim(), while processing ZONE_DMA32, the sum of inactive/active file-backed pages calculated in zone_reclaimable_pages() based on the result of zone_page_state_snapshot() is zero. Additionally, since this system lacks swap, the calculation of inactive/ active anonymous pages is skipped. crash> p nr_swap_pages nr_swap_pages = $1937 = { counter = 0 } As a result, ZONE_DMA32 is deemed unreclaimable and skipped, moving on to the processing of the next zone, ZONE_NORMAL, despite ZONE_DMA32 having free pages significantly exceeding the high watermark. The problem is that the pgdat->kswapd_failures hasn't been incremented. crash> px ((struct pglist_data *) 0xffff00817fffe540)->kswapd_failures $1935 = 0x0 This is because the node deemed balanced. The node balancing logic in balance_pgdat() evaluates all zones collectively. If one or more zones (e.g., ZONE_DMA32) have enough free pages to meet their watermarks, the entire node is deemed balanced. This causes balance_pgdat() to exit early before incrementing the kswapd_failures, as it considers the overall memory state acceptable, even though some zones (like ZONE_NORMAL) remain under significant pressure. The patch ensures that zone_reclaimable_pages() includes free pages (NR_FREE_PAGES) in its calculation when no other reclaimable pages are available (e.g., file-backed or anonymous pages). This change prevents zones like ZONE_DMA32, which have sufficient free pages, from being mistakenly deemed unreclaimable. By doing so, the patch ensures proper node balancing, avoids masking pressure on other zones like ZONE_NORMAL, and prevents infinite loops in throttle_direct_reclaim() caused by allow_direct_reclaim(pgdat) repeatedly returning false. The kernel hangs due to a task stuck in throttle_direct_reclaim(), caused by a node being incorrectly deemed balanced despite pressure in certain zones, such as ZONE_NORMAL. This issue arises from zone_reclaimable_pages() returning 0 for zones without reclaimable file- backed or anonymous pages, causing zones like ZONE_DMA32 with sufficient free pages to be skipped. The lack of swap or reclaimable pages results in ZONE_DMA32 being ignored during reclaim, masking pressure in other zones. Consequently, pgdat->kswapd_failures remains 0 in balance_pgdat(), preventing fallback mechanisms in allow_direct_reclaim() from being triggered, leading to an infinite loop in throttle_direct_reclaim(). This patch modifies zone_reclaimable_pages() to account for free pages (NR_FREE_PAGES) when no other reclaimable pages exist. This ensures zones with sufficient free pages are not skipped, enabling proper balancing and reclaim behavior. [[email protected]: coding-style cleanups] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 5a1c84b ("mm: remove reclaim and compaction retry approximations") Signed-off-by: Seiji Nishikawa <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Darksonn
pushed a commit
to Darksonn/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2025
We found a timeout problem with the pldm command on our system. The reason is that the MCTP-I3C driver has a race condition when receiving multiple-packet messages in multi-thread, resulting in a wrong packet order problem. We identified this problem by adding a debug message to the mctp_i3c_read function. According to the MCTP spec, a multiple-packet message must be composed in sequence, and if there is a wrong sequence, the whole message will be discarded and wait for the next SOM. For example, SOM → Pkt Seq Rust-for-Linux#2 → Pkt Seq Rust-for-Linux#1 → Pkt Seq Rust-for-Linux#3 → EOM. Therefore, we try to solve this problem by adding a mutex to the mctp_i3c_read function. Before the modification, when a command requesting a multiple-packet message response is sent consecutively, an error usually occurs within 100 loops. After the mutex, it can go through 40000 loops without any error, and it seems to run well. Fixes: c8755b2 ("mctp i3c: MCTP I3C driver") Signed-off-by: Leo Yang <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] [[email protected]: dropped already answered question from changelog] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
onestacked
pushed a commit
to onestacked/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2025
Tariq Toukan says: ==================== net/mlx5e: CT: Add support for hardware steering This series start with one more HWS patch by Yevgeny, followed by patches that add support for connection tracking in hardware steering mode. It consists of: - patch Rust-for-Linux#2 hooks up the CT ops for the new mode in the right places. - patch Rust-for-Linux#3 moves a function into a common file, so it can be reused. - patch Rust-for-Linux#4 uses the HWS API to implement connection tracking. The main advantage of hardware steering compared to software steering is vastly improved performance when adding/removing/updating rules. Using the T-Rex traffic generator to initiate multi-million UDP flows per second, a kernel running with these patches was able to offload ~600K unique UDP flows per second, a number around ~7x larger than software steering was able to achieve on the same hardware (256-thread AMD EPYC, 512 GB RAM, ConnectX 7 b2b). ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
onestacked
pushed a commit
to onestacked/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2025
syz reports an out of bounds read: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ocfs2_match fs/ocfs2/dir.c:334 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ocfs2_search_dirblock+0x283/0x6e0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:367 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88804d8b9982 by task syz-executor.2/14802 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 14802 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4 Rust-for-Linux#2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Sched_ext: serialise (enabled+all), task: runnable_at=-10ms Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x229/0x350 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0x164/0x530 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602 ocfs2_match fs/ocfs2/dir.c:334 [inline] ocfs2_search_dirblock+0x283/0x6e0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:367 ocfs2_find_entry_id fs/ocfs2/dir.c:414 [inline] ocfs2_find_entry+0x1143/0x2db0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1078 ocfs2_find_files_on_disk+0x18e/0x530 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1981 ocfs2_lookup_ino_from_name+0xb6/0x110 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2003 ocfs2_lookup+0x30a/0xd40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:122 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3627 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3748 [inline] path_openat+0x145a/0x3870 fs/namei.c:3984 do_filp_open+0xe9/0x1c0 fs/namei.c:4014 do_sys_openat2+0x135/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1402 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1417 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1433 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1428 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x15d/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1428 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x210 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f01076903ad Code: c3 e8 a7 2b 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f01084acfc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f01077cbf80 RCX: 00007f01076903ad RDX: 0000000000105042 RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c RBP: 00007f01077cbf80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001ff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007f01077cbf80 R14: 00007f010764fc90 R15: 00007f010848d000 </TASK> ================================================================== And a general protection fault in ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert: ================================================================== loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768 JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal ocfs2: Mounting device (7,0) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode. Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [Rust-for-Linux#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5096 Comm: syz-executor792 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00002-gb0da640826ba #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ocfs2_find_dir_space_id fs/ocfs2/dir.c:3406 [inline] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert+0x3309/0x5c70 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:4280 Code: 00 00 e8 2a 25 13 fe e9 ba 06 00 00 e8 20 25 13 fe e9 4f 01 00 00 e8 16 25 13 fe 49 8d 7f 08 49 8d 5f 09 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 20 84 c0 0f 85 bd 23 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 0f RSP: 0018:ffffc9000af9f020 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff88801e27a440 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000400 RDI: 0000000000000008 RBP: ffffc9000af9f830 R08: ffffffff8380395b R09: ffffffff838090a7 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff88801e27a440 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffff88803c660878 R14: f700000000000088 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 000055555a677380(0000) GS:ffff888020800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000560bce569178 CR3: 000000001de5a000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ocfs2_mknod+0xcaf/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:292 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4088 do_mknodat+0x3ec/0x5b0 __do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4166 [inline] __se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4163 [inline] __x64_sys_mknodat+0xa7/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4163 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f2dafda3a99 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe336a6658 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000103 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f2dafda3a99 RDX: 00000000000021c0 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007f2dafe1b5f0 R08: 0000000000004480 R09: 000055555a6784c0 R10: 0000000000000103 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe336a6680 R13: 00007ffe336a68a8 R14: 431bde82d7b634db R15: 00007f2dafdec03b </TASK> ================================================================== The two reports are all caused invalid negative i_size of dir inode. For ocfs2, dir_inode can't be negative or zero. Here add a check in which is called by ocfs2_check_dir_for_entry(). It fixes the second report as ocfs2_check_dir_for_entry() must be called before ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert(). Also set a up limit for dir with OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL. The i_size can't be great than blocksize. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Jiacheng Xu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/[email protected]/T/#u Reported-by: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/ Signed-off-by: Su Yue <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
onestacked
pushed a commit
to onestacked/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2025
This fixes the following hard lockup in isolate_lru_folios() during memory reclaim. If the LRU mostly contains ineligible folios this may trigger watchdog. watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 173 RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x255/0x2a0 Call Trace: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x31/0x40 folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x5f/0x90 folio_batch_move_lru+0x91/0x150 lru_add_drain_per_cpu+0x1c/0x40 process_one_work+0x17d/0x350 worker_thread+0x27b/0x3a0 kthread+0xe8/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 lruvec->lru_lock owner： PID: 2865 TASK: ffff888139214d40 CPU: 40 COMMAND: "kswapd0" #0 [fffffe0000945e60] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffffa567a555 Rust-for-Linux#1 [fffffe0000945e68] nmi_handle at ffffffffa563b171 Rust-for-Linux#2 [fffffe0000945eb0] default_do_nmi at ffffffffa6575920 Rust-for-Linux#3 [fffffe0000945ed0] exc_nmi at ffffffffa6575af4 Rust-for-Linux#4 [fffffe0000945ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffa6601dde [exception RIP: isolate_lru_folios+403] RIP: ffffffffa597df53 RSP: ffffc90006fb7c28 RFLAGS: 00000002 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffffc90006fb7c60 RCX: ffffea04a2196f88 RDX: ffffc90006fb7c60 RSI: ffffc90006fb7c60 RDI: ffffea04a2197048 RBP: ffff88812cbd3010 R8: ffffea04a2197008 R9: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffea04a2197008 R13: ffffea04a2197048 R14: ffffc90006fb7de8 R15: 0000000003e3e937 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 <NMI exception stack> Rust-for-Linux#5 [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53 Rust-for-Linux#6 [ffffc90006fb7cf8] shrink_active_list at ffffffffa597f788 Rust-for-Linux#7 [ffffc90006fb7da8] balance_pgdat at ffffffffa5986db0 Rust-for-Linux#8 [ffffc90006fb7ec0] kswapd at ffffffffa5987354 Rust-for-Linux#9 [ffffc90006fb7ef8] kthread at ffffffffa5748238 crash> Scenario: User processe are requesting a large amount of memory and keep page active. Then a module continuously requests memory from ZONE_DMA32 area. Memory reclaim will be triggered due to ZONE_DMA32 watermark alarm reached. However pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from the ZONE_NORMAL area. Reproduce: Terminal 1: Construct to continuously increase pages active(anon). mkdir /tmp/memory mount -t tmpfs -o size=1024000M tmpfs /tmp/memory dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/memory/block bs=4M tail /tmp/memory/block Terminal 2: vmstat -a 1 active will increase. procs ---memory--- ---swap-- ---io---- -system-- ---cpu--- ... r b swpd free inact active si so bi bo 1 0 0 1445623076 45898836 83646008 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 43450228 86094616 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 41003480 88541364 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 38557088 90987756 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445623076 36109688 93435156 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619552 33663256 95881632 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 31217140 98327792 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 28769988 100774944 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 26322348 103222584 0 0 0 1 0 0 1445619804 23875592 105669340 0 0 0 cat /proc/meminfo | head Active(anon) increase. MemTotal: 1579941036 kB MemFree: 1445618500 kB MemAvailable: 1453013224 kB Buffers: 6516 kB Cached: 128653956 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 118110812 kB Inactive: 11436620 kB Active(anon): 115345744 kB Inactive(anon): 945292 kB When the Active(anon) is 115345744 kB, insmod module triggers the ZONE_DMA32 watermark. perf record -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_lru_isolate -aR perf script isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=2 nr_skipped=2 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844 nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844 nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=29 nr_skipped=29 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0 nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon See nr_scanned=28835844. 28835844 * 4k = 115343376KB approximately equal to 115345744 kB. If increase Active(anon) to 1000G then insmod module triggers the ZONE_DMA32 watermark. hard lockup will occur. In my device nr_scanned = 0000000003e3e937 when hard lockup. Convert to memory size 0x0000000003e3e937 * 4KB = 261072092 KB. [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53 ffffc90006fb7c30: 0000000000000020 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c40: ffffc90006fb7d40 ffff88812cbd3000 ffffc90006fb7c50: ffffc90006fb7d30 0000000106fb7de8 ffffc90006fb7c60: ffffea04a2197008 ffffea0006ed4a48 ffffc90006fb7c70: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7c90: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7ca0: 0000000000000000 0000000003e3e937 ffffc90006fb7cb0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffc90006fb7cc0: 8d7c0b56b7874b00 ffff88812cbd3000 About the Fixes: Why did it take eight years to be discovered? The problem requires the following conditions to occur: 1. The device memory should be large enough. 2. Pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from the ZONE_NORMAL area. 3. The memory in ZONE_DMA32 needs to reach the watermark. If the memory is not large enough, or if the usage design of ZONE_DMA32 area memory is reasonable, this problem is difficult to detect. notes: The problem is most likely to occur in ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_NORMAL, but other suitable scenarios may also trigger the problem. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: b2e1875 ("mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis") Signed-off-by: liuye <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Yang Shi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
onestacked
pushed a commit
to onestacked/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2025
Fix a lockdep warning [1] observed during the write combining test.
The warning indicates a potential nested lock scenario that could lead
to a deadlock.
However, this is a false positive alarm because the SF lock and its
parent lock are distinct ones.
The lockdep confusion arises because the locks belong to the same object
class (i.e., struct mlx5_core_dev).
To resolve this, the code has been refactored to avoid taking both
locks. Instead, only the parent lock is acquired.
[1]
raw_ethernet_bw/2118 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.619032] ffff88811dd75e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.620270]
[ 213.620270] but task is already holding lock:
[ 213.620943] ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.622045]
[ 213.622045] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 213.622778] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 213.622778]
[ 213.623465] CPU0
[ 213.623815] ----
[ 213.624148] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.624615] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625071] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625805] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 213.625805]
[ 213.626522] 4 locks held by raw_ethernet_bw/2118:
[ 213.627019] #0: ffff88813f80d578 (&uverbs_dev->disassociate_srcu){.+.+}-{0:0},
at: ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.628088] Rust-for-Linux#1: ffff88810fb23930 (&file->hw_destroy_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x2d/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.629094] Rust-for-Linux#2: ffff88810fb23878 (&file->ucontext_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x49/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.630106] Rust-for-Linux#3: ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.631185]
[ 213.631185] stack backtrace:
[ 213.631718] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2118 Comm: raw_ethernet_bw Not tainted
6.12.0-rc7_internal_net_next_mlx5_89a0ad0 Rust-for-Linux#1
[ 213.632722] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 213.633785] Call Trace:
[ 213.634099]
[ 213.634393] dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0
[ 213.634806] print_deadlock_bug+0x278/0x3c0
[ 213.635265] __lock_acquire+0x15f4/0x2c40
[ 213.635712] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.636120] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.636722] ? mlx5_ib_enable_lb+0x24/0xa0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.637277] __mutex_lock+0x81/0xda0
[ 213.637697] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638305] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638902] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[ 213.639400] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640016] mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640615] set_ucontext_resp+0x68/0x2b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.641144] ? debug_mutex_init+0x33/0x40
[ 213.641586] mlx5_ib_alloc_ucontext+0x18e/0x7b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.642145] ib_init_ucontext+0xa0/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.642679] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_GET_CONTEXT+0x95/0xc0
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.643426] ? _copy_from_user+0x46/0x80
[ 213.643878] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0xa6b/0xc80 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.644426] ? ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x130/0x130
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.645213] ? __lock_acquire+0xa99/0x2c40
[ 213.645675] ? lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.646101] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.646625] ? reacquire_held_locks+0xcf/0x1f0
[ 213.647102] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x45d/0x770
[ 213.647586] ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xe0/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648102] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648632] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4d3/0xaa0
[ 213.649060] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x4a8/0x770
[ 213.649528] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
[ 213.649947] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
[ 213.650478] RIP: 0033:0x7fa179b0737b
[ 213.650893] Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c
89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8
10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d
7d 2a 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 213.652619] RSP: 002b:00007ffd2e6d46e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[ 213.653390] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd2e6d47f8 RCX:
00007fa179b0737b
[ 213.654084] RDX: 00007ffd2e6d47e0 RSI: 00000000c0181b01 RDI:
0000000000000003
[ 213.654767] RBP: 00007ffd2e6d47c0 R08: 00007fa1799be010 R09:
0000000000000002
[ 213.655453] R10: 00007ffd2e6d4960 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00007ffd2e6d487c
[ 213.656170] R13: 0000000000000027 R14: 0000000000000001 R15:
00007ffd2e6d4f70
Fixes: d98995b ("net/mlx5: Reimplement write combining test")
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael Guralnik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
onestacked
pushed a commit
to onestacked/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2025
Clear the port select structure on error so no stale values left after
definers are destroyed. That's because the mlx5_lag_destroy_definers()
always try to destroy all lag definers in the tt_map, so in the flow
below lag definers get double-destroyed and cause kernel crash:
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create()
mlx5_lag_create_definers()
mlx5_lag_create_definer() <- Failed on tt 1
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers() <- definers[tt=0] gets destroyed
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create()
mlx5_lag_create_definers()
mlx5_lag_create_definer() <- Failed on tt 0
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers() <- definers[tt=0] gets double-destroyed
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000005
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000
CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000112ce2e00
[0000000000000008] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [Rust-for-Linux#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: iptable_raw bonding ip_gre ip6_gre gre ip6_tunnel tunnel6 geneve ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel ipip tunnel4 ip_tunnel rdma_ucm(OE) rdma_cm(OE) iw_cm(OE) ib_ipoib(OE) ib_cm(OE) ib_umad(OE) mlx5_ib(OE) ib_uverbs(OE) mlx5_fwctl(OE) fwctl(OE) mlx5_core(OE) mlxdevm(OE) ib_core(OE) mlxfw(OE) memtrack(OE) mlx_compat(OE) openvswitch nsh nf_conncount psample xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo xt_addrtype iptable_filter iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc netconsole overlay efi_pstore sch_fq_codel zram ip_tables crct10dif_ce qemu_fw_cfg fuse ipv6 crc_ccitt [last unloaded: mlx_compat(OE)]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/u53:2 Tainted: G OE 6.11.0+ Rust-for-Linux#2
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
Workqueue: mlx5_lag mlx5_do_bond_work [mlx5_core]
pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x24/0x2c0 [mlx5_core]
lr : mlx5_lag_destroy_definer+0x54/0x100 [mlx5_core]
sp : ffff800085fafb00
x29: ffff800085fafb00 x28: ffff0000da0c8000 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: ffff0000da0c8000 x25: ffff0000da0c8000 x24: ffff0000da0c8000
x23: ffff0000c31f81a0 x22: 0400000000000000 x21: ffff0000da0c8000
x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000ffff8b0c9350
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800081390d18 x12: ffff800081dc3cc0
x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000b10 x9 : ffff80007ab7304c
x8 : ffff0000d00711f0 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 0000000000000190
x5 : ffff00027edb3010 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : ffff0000d39b8000 x1 : ffff0000d39b8000 x0 : 0400000000000000
Call trace:
mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x24/0x2c0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_destroy_definer+0x54/0x100 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers+0xa0/0x108 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create+0x2d4/0x6f8 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_activate_lag+0x60c/0x6f8 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_do_bond_work+0x284/0x5c8 [mlx5_core]
process_one_work+0x170/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x2d8/0x3e0
kthread+0x11c/0x128
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: a9025bf5 aa0003f6 a90363f7 f90023f9 (f9400400)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: dc48516 ("net/mlx5: Lag, add support to create definers for LAG")
Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
onestacked
pushed a commit
to onestacked/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2025
…rnel/git/at91/linux into soc/dt Microchip AT91 device tree updates for v6.14 Rust-for-Linux#2 This update includes: - device tree files for the SAMA7D65 SoC and its evaluation board * tag 'at91-dt-6.14-2' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux: ARM: dts: microchip: add support for sama7d65_curiosity board ARM: dts: microchip: add sama7d65 SoC DT Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
senekor
pushed a commit
to senekor/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 21, 2025
Some combinations of Pi 4Bs and Ethernet switches don't reliably get a DCHP-assigned IP address, leaving the unit with a self=assigned 169.254 address. In the failure case, the Pi is left able to receive packets but not send them, suggesting that the MAC<->PHY link is getting into a bad state. It has been found empirically that skipping a reset step by the genet driver prevents the failures. No downsides have been discovered yet, and unlike the forced renegotiation it doesn't increase the time to get an IP address, so the workaround is enabled by default; add genet.skip_umac_reset=n to the command line to disable it. See: raspberrypi/linux#3108 Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <[email protected]>
onestacked
pushed a commit
to onestacked/linux
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof Rust-for-Linux#19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> Rust-for-Linux#2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> Rust-for-Linux#1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] Rust-for-Linux#1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] Rust-for-Linux#2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] Rust-for-Linux#3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] Rust-for-Linux#4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof Rust-for-Linux#19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd) Cc: [email protected]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Unstable features (including language, library, tools...) we currently use.
See as well:
corewanted features & bugfixes #514allocwanted features & bugfixes #408stdwanted features & bugfixes #572rustcwanted features & bugfixes #355rustdocwanted features & bugfixes #350rustfmtwanted features & bugfixes #398bindgenwanted features & bugfixes #353rustupwanted features & bugfixes #396paholewanted features & bugfixes #1096rustc_codegen_gccwanted features & bugfixes #1098Required (we almost certainly want them)
cfg(no_fp_fmt_parse).core).feature(arbitrary_self_types).arbitrary_self_typesrust-lang/rust#44874.Arc.derive(CoercePointee)builds on top of this.feature(receiver_trait)instead.feature(asm_const)with support for raw pointers.constexpressions rust-lang/rust#132012.feature(asm_goto).asm!rust-lang/rust#119365) and in FCP passed in stabilization PR: Stabilizeasm_gotofeature gate rust-lang/rust#133870. Reference PR: Add reference for asm-goto rust-lang/reference#1693. Release notes: Tracking issue for release notes of #133870: Stabilizeasm_gotofeature gate rust-lang/rust#134860.asmgoto should default to safe rust-lang/rust#132078.feature(asm_goto_with_outputs)in order to stabilizefeature(asm_goto)sooner): Fix asm goto with outputs and move it to a separate feature gate rust-lang/rust#131523 (1.85).feature(compiler_builtins)or, better, a way to disable/disallow certain intrinsics.feature(derive_coerce_pointee)(previouslyfeature(derive_smart_pointer)), i.e.derive(CoercePointee)(previouslyderive(SmartPointer)).derive(CoercePointee)rust-lang/rust#123430.derive(CoercePointee)rust-lang/rust#134624.Arc.derive(CoercePointee)rust-lang/rust#133820). The kernel will useCoercePointeesince v6.14 (commit 47cb6bf ("rust: use derive(CoercePointee) on rustc >= 1.84.0")).CoercePointeedoesn't tightly enforce the restriction to#[repr(transparent)]-only wrappers, if other proc-macros are involved rust-lang/rust#135206.CoerceUnsizedbuiltin checks do not handle aliases rust-lang/rust#135214.Arc.derive(SmartPointer)rust-lang/rust#123472.feature(pin_coerce_unsized_trait), one of the solutions for the unsoundness issue in the main RFC): PinCoerceUnsized trait into core rust-lang/rust#125048 (1.82).DispatchFromDynandCoerceUnsizedimpl validation rust-lang/rust#135228 (1.86).derive(SmartPtr)rust-lang/rust#129104.SmartPointertoCoercePointeerust-lang/rust#131284.#[pointee]attribute is required even if there is only one generic parameter rust-lang/rust#129465.feature(register_tool).#![register_tool]rust-lang/rust#66079.klintExperimental PR for introducing klint #958.-Zbinary_dep_depinfo=y.-Zbranch-protection.-Z branch-protectionrust-lang/rust#113369.CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNELetc.-Zcf-protection-- see https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/.60-Zbranch-protection.60.20stability/near/391152508.-Zcf-protection=branch(CET).CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT(https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/).-Zdebuginfo-compression(includingzstdsupport in Rust binaries' bundled LLVM).-Zdebuginfo-compressionrust-lang/rust#120953.zstdsupport is used in Android, where it currently warns, see commit dbef181 ("kbuild: rust: use-Zdebuginfo-compression").-Zdirect-access-external-data={yes,no}(Clang's-fdirect-access-external-data).-Zdirect-access-external-datarust-lang/rust#127488.-Z direct-access-external-datacmdline flag forrustcrust-lang/rust#119162).-Zdwarf-version.-Zdwarf-versionrust-lang/rust#103057.-Zfixed-x18.-Zfixed-x18rust-lang/rust#124655.-Zfunction-return=thunk-extern.-Zfunction-returnrust-lang/rust#116853.CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETHUNK.-Zfunction-return={keep,thunk-extern}option rust-lang/rust#116892).-Zfunction-return=thunk-externrust-lang/rust#130824.-Zinstrument-mcount.#[coverage]rust-lang/rust#84605 (#[no_coverage]).-Zmin-function-alignment=N.#[repr(align(...))]on function items (fn_align) rust-lang/rust#82232.-falign-functions=0only for a few CPUs).-Zmin-function-alignmentrust-lang/rust#134030).-Cmin-function-alignment/-Calign-functionssupport inrustcrust-lang/rust#128830.-fmin-function-alignmentand Clang's-falign-functions, i.e. align all functions, including cold functions.-falign-functions(GCC, Clang).-Zno-jump-tables.no-jump-tablesrust-lang/rust#116592.CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT(https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/).-Zno-jump-tablesrust-lang/rust#105812 (1.68).-Zpatchable-function-entrysupport (GCC's and Clang's-fpatchable-function-entry), as well as thepatchable_function_entryfunction attribute.-Zrandomize-layout(and-Zlayout-seed=<seed>).-Z randomize-layoutrust-lang/rust#106764.CONFIG_RANDSTRUCT*).-Zregparm=3(GCC's/Clang's-mregparm=3).-Zregparmrust-lang/rust#131749.history.git).-Zregparm=3support inrustcrust-lang/rust#116972.-Zregparm=3could have been just a bit of plumbing inrustc, but it turns out Clang is the one that has the logic to decide the registers, which then get marked in LLVM IR, and thusrustcneeds to duplicate the logic (or moving it into LLVM and then wait for a release).-Zreg-struct-return(GCC's/Clang's-freg-struct-return).-Zreg-struct-returnsupport inrustcrust-lang/rust#116973.-Zreg-struct-returncan be skipped if atarget.jsonis used (abi_return_struct_as_intin target spec).-Zsanitizer=kcfi&-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers(KCFI).CONFIG_CFI_CLANG).-Cpanic=abortuntil LLVM'sinvokesupports KCFI bundles: CFI: Abstract Closures and Coroutines rust-lang/rust#123106 (comment).-Ztune-cpu=generic.Makefile.-Zuse-sync-unwind=n.nremains the default.rustdoc's--generate-link-to-definition(-Zunstable-options).[references]link from doc/source view could be nice to get).rustdoc: a way to extract doctests (currently using a hack via--test-builder+--no-run(-Zunstable-options)).--extract-doctestscommand-line flag rust-lang/rust#134529.--extract-doctestscommand-line flag rust-lang/rust#134531.--no-runrust-lang/rust#87022.--test-builderrust-lang/rust#102981.ignore, etc.).--runtool*flags ((PR: Allow cross-compiling doctests rust-lang/rust#60387, Tracking Issue: Tracking Issue for Cross Compiling Doctests rust-lang/rust#64245)) allow to run tests under a particular tool, but it simply passes the path of the prebuilt binary to the tool, e.g.valgrind, thus it is not useful in our case.#[test]s or manipulating them).Clippy's configuration file.
Clippy's
CLIPPY_CONF_DIRenvironment variable..clippy.toml).Remaining target features unknown to
rustc.#[target_feature]rust-lang/rust#44839.Target specification file (
target.json) or enough command-line flags to replace it.-Cglobal-target-feature=, target modifiers...) could be useful, i.e. a target feature that is required to be set the same way for all compilation units (without requiring a new target). In other words, using flags to create combinations of targets instead of requiring a different for each combination. See-Cfixed-x18discussion as well.-Cflags that may change ABI): Tracking issue for all the ways in which -C compiler flags can alter the ABI rust-lang/rust#131837.A way to build
corewith a stable compiler.core(i.e. the one that comes with the compiler). We only do it because we cannot use the prebuilt builtin ones. Any way to build it (including the current one, i.e. just building it as-is) would be fine for us. There have been discussions about a potential-Zbuild-stdflag forrustc, e.g.-Zbuild-std=core(that could also potentially automatically find the source code for the library in the sysroot etc.).Nice to have (not critical, we could workaround if needed, etc.)
As many required bits done in the Rust version of the upcoming Debian Stable (Trixie).
feature(associated_type_defaults).TODOcomment in the upcomingpci.rs(https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/), as well as potentially other places (e.g. in the past,file_operations.rsto simplify boilerplate needed by drivers).feature(const_trait_impl).impl const Trait for Tyand~const(tilde const) syntax (const_trait_impl) rust-lang/rust#67792.rust/kernel/driver.rsin the past (e.g. see_new_id_array!,define_id_array!anddefine_id_table!in https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/).feature(doc_cfg).#[doc(cfg(…))],#[doc(cfg_hide(…))]anddoc_auto_cfgrust-lang/rust#43781.rust/kernel/lib.rsin our oldrustbranch.doc(cfg(...))from thecfg(...)(to avoid duplication) etc. See also Consider allowing to build docs for the current kernel config #447.feature(duration_constants).rust/kernel/delay.rs.TimeUnitsto do things like2.seconds()). We can always use our own constants.feature(ptr_metadata)(core::ptr::metadataandcore::ptr::from_raw_parts_mutfunctions).Arcin the past (before we switched tobyte_sub, i.e.pointer_byte_offsets), and potentially byimpl_zeroable!to include pointers to DSTs when their metadata isZeroablevia thePointeetrait.-Zcrate-attr.-Zfunction-sections(inrustc, it applies to data too).rustc: rust-lang/rust@6b130e3).Makefile(underCONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION, which is experimental so far).-Zub-checks(cfg(ub_checks)).feature(cfg_ub_checks)and-Zub-checksrust-lang/rust#123499.-Cdebug-assertions, but not stabilizing this means one cannot enable/disable each of them independently.-Zunpretty=expanded.RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1only for the target that uses it, if needed).Low priority (we will likely not use them in the end)
feature(allocator_api).allocfork, but we are likely dropping it (https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/); otherwise: still quite open.feature(pointer_is_aligned)(is_aligned_to).FromBytes(VFS abstractions, Useis_aligned_toinFromBytesonce it's available #1038).is_aligned()) got stabilized in 1.79 (stabilize ptr.is_aligned, move ptr.is_aligned_to to a new feature gate rust-lang/rust#121948).is_aligned_to()may be stabilized, but it needs to be justified.Done (stabilized, not needed anymore, etc.)
--check-cfg.--check-cfgoption rust-lang/rust#123501).cfgs): Limit the number of names and values in check-cfg diagnostics rust-lang/rust#121202 (1.78).CARGO_CRATE_NAMEinstead ofCARGOas a better heuristic for Cargo diagnostics): Use better heuristic for printing Cargo specific diagnostics rust-lang/rust#121237 (1.78).--extern force:.--extern forcerust-lang/rust#111302.allocextern to allow "empty" Rust files")), but not anymore since v6.13 due to the allocator series landing (commit 392e34b ("kbuild: rust: remove thealloccrate andGlobalAlloc")).new_uninitis dropped. There may be other workarounds. Added as unstable in 1.71 (Addforceoption for--externflag rust-lang/rust#109421).cfg(no_global_oom_handling).alloc) in the past, but not anymore since v6.13 due to the allocator series landing.cfg(no_rc).alloc) in the past, but not anymore since v6.13 due to the allocator series landing.alloc: add unstable cfg featuresno_rcandno_syncrust-lang/rust#89891).cfg(no_sync).alloc) in the past, but not anymore since v6.13 due to the allocator series landing.alloc: add unstable cfg featuresno_rcandno_syncrust-lang/rust#89891).feature(alloc_error_handler).no_global_oom_handling.feature(asm_const).asm_construst-lang/rust#128570).feature(bench_black_box).std::hint::black_boxrust-lang/rust#64102.samples/rust/rust_stack_probing.rs.feature(box_uninit_write).box_uninit_writerust-lang/rust#129397.unsafeblock inBox<T>::new()(BoxExt), but not anymore since v6.13 due to the allocator series landing.feature(c_size_t)# rust-lang/rust#88345.rust/kernel/file.rsin our oldrustbranch (so far, but could be anywhere in the abstractions).core_ffi_cgot stabilized in 1.64 (Stabilizecore::ffi:c_*and re-export instd::ffirust-lang/rust#98315) andc_{s,}size_tare now incore::ffisince 1.61 (Provide C FFI types via core::ffi, not just in std rust-lang/rust#94503).feature(coerce_unsized)&feature(unsize)(core::ops::CoerceUnsizedandcore::marker::Unsizetraits).Arc.feature(derive_smart_pointer)instead to avoid depending onArc's needed features; otherwise: "theCoerceUnsizedtrait is unstable and we wish to revisit its design before stabilizing, so for now only stdlib types can be unsized" + there are unsoundness issues, seePinis unsound due to transitive effects ofCoerceUnsizedrust-lang/rust#68015 and APinunsoundness involving animpl DerefMut for Pin<&dyn LocalTrait>rust-lang/rust#85099. See https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/rust-for-linux.20custom.20arc.20unstable.20feature.20requirements.feature(concat_idents).concat_identsrust-lang/rust#29599.drivers/android/defs.rsin the past, nothing now.pastecrate is an alternative (or, in general, generating code). We ended up using a proc macro on our side Re-implement concat_idents! in libmacros #826.feature(const_fn_transmute).rust/kernel/str.rs.const_fn_transmute,const_fn_unionrust-lang/rust#85769). It is one of the subfeatures ofconst_fn.feature(const_fn_trait_bound).const fnrust-lang/rust#57563.rust/kernel/file_operations.rsandrust/kernel/module_param.rs.const_fn.feature(const_maybe_uninit_as_mut_ptr).rust/kernel/device_id.rs. https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/#iZ31rust:kernel:lib.rsMaybeUninit::as_mut_ptrrust-lang/rust#130542).feature(const_maybe_uninit_zeroed).const_maybe_uninit_zeroedrust-lang/rust#91850.const_maybe_uninit_zeroedandconst_mem_zeroedrust-lang/rust#116218).feature(const_mut_refs)&feature(const_refs_to_static).&mut Tin const contexts (const_mut_refs) rust-lang/rust#57349 and Tracking Issue for const_refs_to_static rust-lang/rust#119618.const TABLEs (settingownerfield toTHIS_MODULE), as well asrust/kernel/module_param.rs(in therustbranch).const_mut_refsstabilized in 1.83 (Stabilize&mut(and*mut) as well as&Cell(and*const Cell) in const rust-lang/rust#129195; reference: const_eval: update for const_mut_refs and const_refs_to_cell stabilization rust-lang/reference#1590);const_refs_to_staticstabilized in 1.82 (Stabilizeconst_refs_to_staticrust-lang/rust#129759). It is one of the subfeatures ofconst_fn.VTABLEtest case (tests/ui/consts/const-ref-to-static-linux-vtable.rs): const_mut_refs: allow mutable pointers to statics rust-lang/rust#120932 (1.78).feature(const_panic).rust/kernel/print.rs.const_panicrust-lang/rust#89508). It is one of the subfeatures ofconst_fn.feature(const_ptr_offset_from).rust/kernel/driver.rs.const_ptr_offset_from. rust-lang/rust#96240).feature(const_ptr_write).rust/kernel/device_id.rs. https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/#iZ31rust:kernel:lib.rsptr::write*andmem::replacerust-lang/rust#130954).feature(const_raw_ptr_deref)rust/kernel/str.rs.const_fn_transmutesince that was getting stabilized sooner.feature(const_refs_to_cell).const_refs_to_cellrust-lang/rust#80384.rust/kernel/driver.rs,offset_of!(iffeature(offset_of)does not pan out).&mut(and*mut) as well as&Cell(and*const Cell) in const rust-lang/rust#129195, reference: const_eval: update for const_mut_refs and const_refs_to_cell stabilization rust-lang/reference#1590).feature(const_unreachable_unchecked).unreachable_uncheckedrust-lang/rust#53188.rust/kernel/str.rs.unreachable_uncheckedasconst fnrust-lang/rust#89509). It is one of the subfeatures ofconst_fn.feature(core_ffi_c)module!, etc.core::ffi:c_*and re-export instd::ffirust-lang/rust#98315).feature(core_panic).rust/build_assert.rs.panic!("{}", msg)(2021 edition, allowed in const context since Allowpanic!("{}", computed_str)in const fn. rust-lang/rust#88954).feature(dispatch_from_dyn)(core::ops::DispatchFromDyntrait).Arc.feature(derive_smart_pointer)instead to avoid depending onArc's needed features; otherwise: see https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/rust-for-linux.20custom.20arc.20unstable.20feature.20requirements.DispatchFromDynrules allowing non-PhantomDataZSTs in additional fields is unsound rust-lang/rust#135220.feature(explicit_generic_args_with_impl_trait)explicit_generic_args_with_impl_traitrust-lang/rust#83701.pinned-init.feature(generic_associated_types).rust/kernel/types.rs(PointerWrapper),rust/kernel/file_operations.rs(IoctlHandler).feature(global_asm).rust/module.rsproc macro.module.rs, use codegen instead #77.feature(impl_trait_in_assoc_type).rnullin the past (https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/), but not anymore.feature(inline_const).rust/kernel/lib.rs.feature(let_else).let_elsehelps naturally with that (when applicable).rust/macros/paste.rsand potentially everywhere.let elserust-lang/rust#93628).feature(lint_reasons).#[expect]attribute. This feature already helped to discover that-Wclippy::dbg_macrowas not being applied in the kernel, which triggered Customdbg!macros fordbg_macrolint rust-lang/rust-clippy#11303.#[expect(...)]attribute").#[expect]some lints: Stabilizelint_reasons(RFC 2383) rust-lang/rust#120924) and issues are getting actively fixed, e.g. we found#[expect(dead_code)]does not behave identically to#[allow(dead_code)]rust-lang/rust#114557 while testing the feature for the kernel and it was fixed already in Respect#[expect]the same way#[allow]is with thedead_codelint rust-lang/rust#114710. The precise semantics (three possibilities: 1, 2a, 2b) are under discussion at Decision: semantics of the#[expect]attribute rust-lang/rust#115980.#[expect]attribute andreasonsparameter (RFC 2383) rust-lang/reference#1237.feature(maybe_uninit_extra).#![feature(maybe_uninit_extra,const_maybe_uninit_write)]rust-lang/rust#63567.rust/kernel/miscdev.rs.maybe_uninit_extrarust-lang/rust#92768) (non-const only, which is the only part we need).feature(more_fallible_allocation_methods).more_fallible_allocation_methodsrust-lang/rust#86942.allocin the past, but not anymore.feature(new_uninit).pin-initAPI in the past, but not anymore since v6.13 due to the allocator series landing.feature(new_uninit)rust-lang/rust#129401). The feature was split during stabilization, with a couple new features were created for things not to be stabilized yet:box_uninit_write(which we could use to avoid anunsafeblock, but it was replaced for the time being) andnew_zeroed_alloc.feature(offset_of)(single-field, i.e. noenum, no nested).#![feature(offset_of)]rust-lang/rust#106655.rust/kernel/workqueue.rsandkernel/kasync/executor/workqueue.rs(https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git/commit/?h=for-6.7-rust-bindings&id=7324b88975c525a013ae0db747df97924ce80675).feature(offset_of_nested).feature(pin_macro).core::pin::pin!rust-lang/rust#93178.stack_pin_init!andstack_try_pin_init!.::{core,std}::pin::pin!rust-lang/rust#103800).feature(receiver_trait)(core::ops::Receivertrait).Arc.feature(arbitrary_self_types)in v6.12.feature(try_reserve).try_reserve: RFC 2116 fallible collection allocation rust-lang/rust#48043.rust/kernel/lib.rs.-Zallow-features.-Zbuild-std.rusttesttarget, back when we had a customalloc).allocanmore. The actual progress is not clear. Seestdwanted features & bugfixes #572.-Zsplit-dwarf-kind=split.splitstops being the default.splitis the default, we will not need it.-Zsymbol-mangling-version=v0.rust/exports.c.__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable.rust/kernel/allocator.rsin the past, but not anymore since v6.13 due to the allocator series landing: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/6HIL4hSg3hOCh5IDDOtdEaEy89ZksSJmSLNiKrSvpu2Q78wA5KdrCCrcPSD_p4jB7IlmVRyVBnvBllU4irzuYgpQJOBtwUInAKdOibtRjVc=@protonmail.com/, Björn says:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: