-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remote Tunnel #17
Comments
The tunnel uses a nonstandard port for the tunnel app to communicate with the silk server. Because of the nonstandard port it doesn't work on many of the free PaaS such as heroku. Exoscale gave us enough credits for up to 18 months of free hosting for this. I have Silk Server running at http://185.19.29.43:2999. To use:
Using the master branch everything works remotely except the terminal app. I have updated the first comment's list. |
We now have a domain: silkgui.com. Remote is at remote.silkgui.com:2999. I will try to switch it to port 80 and get it to work with www. |
In NodeOS/NodeOS#79 there is discussions of using reverse proxy to allow remote access. remote.silkgui.com will only need to ask the nodeos address, send a message over websocket to start Silk, and once Silk has started redirect to it. |
Interesting, I'll take a look |
Right now the tunnel uses http://localtunnel.me/ and their npm package.
We should switch to @formula1 Silk Server.
ToDo
The server is at http://185.19.29.43:2999/.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: