Rebel on the Canal #46
chengjun
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Yiming Cao, Shuo Chen, 2022, Rebel on the Canal: Disrupted Trade Access and Social Conflict in China, 1650–1911, American Economic Review.
This paper examines the effects of the closure of China’s Grand Canal - the world’s largest and oldest artifificial waterway - which served as a permanent shock to regionat trade access. Using an original dataset covering 575 counties over 262 years, we show that the canal’s closure led to social turmoil that engulfed North China in the nineteenth century. Counties along the canal experienced an additional 126% increase in rebelliousness after the canal’s closure relative to their non-canal counterparts. We explore several prominent mechanisms that potentially explain our results and find the most support for disrupted trade access, especially in urban areas. Our findings thus highlight the important role that continued access to trade routes plays in reducing conflict - a classic conjecture that has rarely been directly tested in a causal context.
关于贸易机会之于社会稳定的作用已有广泛讨论。一方面,贸易机会增加居民收入、提供就业机会,维持社会稳定;另一方面,通达的贸易环境也为动荡的出现提供沃土。文章以1826年在大运河施行的“漕粮海运”政策为准自然实验,试图探讨贸易机会与社会稳定间的因果联系。
文章使用涵盖大运河流域周边六省共计575座县域、262年间的清廷官方统计数据,该数据详细记载了地方叛乱的时空信息;利用双重差分模型,将1826年视为外生冲击发生年,比较“运河县”(运河流经或穿过的县域)与其他县(距运河较远县域)间地方叛乱发生数量的差别。
研究表明,与偏远县相比,冲击产生后的运河县每百万人口叛乱人数比增加了0.0414人。进一步,文章发现,政策冲击对叛乱的效用与县域内运河长度(地理依赖)、距运河10km内集市占该县集市份额(经济依赖)有关;且影响效果随距运河距离增加而衰减。多种稳健性检验方式证实了结果可信。机制上,研究发现运河废弃可能通过“贸易机会的丧失”影响着叛乱起义的发生,这与现有历史研究相符合。文章贡献大致有四:
American Economic Review
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20201283
Data and Code for Rebel on the Canal
Rebel on the Canal: Disrupted Trade Access and Social Conflict in China, 1650-1911 https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/157781/version/V1/view
Project Citation:
Cao, Yiming, and Chen, Shuo. Data and Code for: Rebel on the Canal: Rebel on the Canal: Disrupted Trade Access and Social Conflict in China, 1650-1911. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2022. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2022-04-19. https://doi.org/10.3886/E157781V1
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions