Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[EPIC] Extend check for scs-0100-v3 to cover more properties #554

Open
mbuechse opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[EPIC] Extend check for scs-0100-v3 to cover more properties #554

mbuechse opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@mbuechse
Labels
enhancement New feature or request epic Issues that are spread across multiple sprints SCS is standardized SCS is standardized SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10
Milestone
R7 (v8.0.0)

Comments

@mbuechse
Copy link
Contributor

mbuechse commented Apr 8, 2024

such as

  • IOPS for local ssds
@mbuechse mbuechse added enhancement New feature or request SCS is standardized SCS is standardized SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10 labels Apr 8, 2024
@mbuechse mbuechse added this to the R7 (v8.0.0) milestone Apr 8, 2024
@mbuechse mbuechse added the epic Issues that are spread across multiple sprints label Apr 8, 2024
@mbuechse mbuechse self-assigned this Apr 11, 2024
@mbuechse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that this does have some overlap with scs-0103-v1.

@anjastrunk anjastrunk mentioned this issue Apr 15, 2024
Open
59 tasks
@anjastrunk anjastrunk changed the title Extend check for scs-0100-v3 to cover more properties [EPIC] Extend check for scs-0100-v3 to cover more properties Aug 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mbuechse mbuechse

Labels
enhancement New feature or request epic Issues that are spread across multiple sprints SCS is standardized SCS is standardized SCS-VP10 Related to tender lot SCS-VP10
Projects
Sovereign Cloud Stack
Status: Backlog
Milestone
R7 (v8.0.0)
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mbuechse