You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Renaming SemImply to SemImplied (and imply field to implied, imply() call to implied() usw) can potentially resolve some confusion. imply is a verb, so it implies that the imply() call does some action, or that SemImply are some kind of callable objects, whereas imply() is just the accessor method, and SemImply is not callable.
Also, the docs refer to them as "imply types", and I often find myself stumbling over the grammar of such sentences, because on the first read I treat "imply" as a predicate.
With "implied" there should be less confusion, also SemImplied/implied would have a nice complementarity to SemObserved/observed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Renaming
SemImply
toSemImplied
(andimply
field toimplied
,imply()
call toimplied()
usw) can potentially resolve some confusion.imply
is a verb, so it implies that theimply()
call does some action, or thatSemImply
are some kind of callable objects, whereasimply()
is just the accessor method, andSemImply
is not callable.Also, the docs refer to them as "imply types", and I often find myself stumbling over the grammar of such sentences, because on the first read I treat "imply" as a predicate.
With "implied" there should be less confusion, also
SemImplied
/implied
would have a nice complementarity toSemObserved
/observed
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: