You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, when presenting the comparison of MedSAM2 with various methods in the paper, I noticed that MedSAM2's segmentation metrics on the BTCV dataset are better than SAM2's. However, I saw in the paper that MedSAM2 directly applies SAM2 when handling 3D medical images. So why is there such a difference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, when presenting the comparison of MedSAM2 with various methods in the paper, I noticed that MedSAM2's segmentation metrics on the BTCV dataset are better than SAM2's. However, I saw in the paper that MedSAM2 directly applies SAM2 when handling 3D medical images. So why is there such a difference?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: