Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results of validating ECFO using OOPS and FOOPS #15

Open
inaja opened this issue May 6, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Results of validating ECFO using OOPS and FOOPS #15

inaja opened this issue May 6, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@inaja
Copy link
Collaborator

inaja commented May 6, 2023

OOPS
1.1. Important:
1.1.1. Missing disjointness
1.1.2. Missing domain or range: ecfo#hasApplicableLocation and 1 dc property (publisher), 2 qudt properties (abbreviation and value), and 1 schema (molecularFormula)
1.2. Minor
1.2.1. Unconnected elements: prov:Activity, prov:Entity, foaf:Organization, skos:Concept
1.2.2. Missing annotations: foaf:Organization
1.2.3. Missing explicit declaration of inverse relationshipts: 13 cases, 7 are peco: hasTag, hasEmissionTarget, hasScope, hasTargetUnit, hasApplicableLocation, hasSoutceUnit, hasApplicablePeriod, and hasEmissionSource. The rest are dc, time, and prov relationships.
1.2.4.URI contains file extension
FOOPS
2.1. Findable:
2.1.1.  Ontology in metadata registry: Ontology not found in a public registry
2.2. Accessible
2.2.1: FIND_3_BIS: Ontology not found in a public registry (would be solved along witl 2.1.1)
2.3. Interoperable: all good
2.4. Reusable:
2.4.1 Missing recommended metadata: citation and contributor.
2.4.2. Missing detailed metadata: doi, publisher, logo, status, source, issued, backwards compatibility
2.4.3. Missing optional basic provenance metadata: contributor
2.4.4. Missing detailed provenance metadata: issued, publisher
@dgarijo
Copy link
Member

dgarijo commented May 6, 2023

Thanks!
Similarly, from OOPS, no further action.
From FOOPS!:

  • We are waiting for LOV approval
  • We can add a few of these properties that are missing. None of the remarks seem critical, so we are good :)

@dgarijo dgarijo added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels May 6, 2023
@dgarijo dgarijo self-assigned this May 6, 2023
@dgarijo
Copy link
Member

dgarijo commented May 6, 2023

Oh, logos should be solved soon (issue #2 )

@dgarijo
Copy link
Member

dgarijo commented May 8, 2023

LOV link: https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/ecfo

@inaja
Copy link
Collaborator Author

inaja commented May 8, 2023

Sorry deleted previous comment by mistake:
Update on FOOPS: 98%

  1. Findable: all good
  2. Accessible: all good
  3. Interoperable: all good
  4. Reusable: 8.42/9
    4.1 Missing recommended metadata: citation. and optionally contributor.
    4.2. Missing detailed metadata: doi and source. and optionally backwards compatibility.
    4.3. Missing optional basic provenance metadata: contributor

@dgarijo
Copy link
Member

dgarijo commented May 9, 2023

I think we have reached a status where we can do a release so we obtain a DOI

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants