Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: reducing user id fetching db call! #101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024
Merged

fix: reducing user id fetching db call! #101

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

amindadgar
Copy link
Member

@amindadgar amindadgar commented Jul 10, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced heatmap analysis with improved initialization and additional conditional checks, including bot identification.

  • Refactor

    • Updated method parameters for better data handling and consistency in heatmap analysis.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The analysis_heatmap method in analyzer_heatmaps.py was updated to improve data handling and enhance the analysis process. The method now initializes account_list before entering a loop and includes additional checks during iteration, specifically involving bot_ids. Parameters were also added to method calls within analysis_heatmap to support these changes.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
discord_analyzer/analyzer/analyzer_heatmaps.py Updated the analysis_heatmap method to initialize account_list earlier and add conditions involving bot_ids. Enhanced method calls by adding guildId parameter.

Poem

In lines of code, new paths we pave, 🌟
With guildId in our methods brave.
account_list starts strong and true,
Checking bots as we analyze through.
A heatmap now more keenly wise,
Discord's secrets in clearer skies.
Cheers to code, let's lift our eyes! 🚀

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jul 10, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
discord_analyzer/analyzer/analyzer_heatmaps.py (2)

Line range hint 15-15: Update the docstring to include the guildId parameter.

The guildId parameter is missing in the docstring. It should be documented for clarity.

        guildId : str
+            the guild id to analyze data for

137-140: Improve readability by combining conditions.

The conditions involving account_list and bot_ids can be combined for better readability.

-                    if (
-                        entry["author"] not in account_list
-                        and entry["author"] not in bot_ids
-                    ):
+                    if entry["author"] not in account_list and entry["author"] not in bot_ids:
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 547bc66 and 0a1050d.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • discord_analyzer/analyzer/analyzer_heatmaps.py (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
discord_analyzer/analyzer/analyzer_heatmaps.py (1)

103-106: Ensure proper error handling for get_userids.

The function get_userids could potentially raise exceptions. Ensure proper error handling is in place.

Are there any exceptions raised by get_userids that need to be handled here?

@cyri113 cyri113 merged commit ab1a50c into main Jul 10, 2024
14 checks passed
@amindadgar amindadgar linked an issue Jul 10, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Bug: Very slow & intensive heatmaps computation #100
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@cyri113 cyri113 cyri113 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: Very slow & intensive heatmaps computation
2 participants
@amindadgar @cyri113