Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Include bottom-up model to increase the attractiveness of discussing the cost model. #22

Open
a-t-0 opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Include bottom-up model to increase the attractiveness of discussing the cost model. #22

a-t-0 opened this issue Sep 8, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@a-t-0
Copy link
Member

a-t-0 commented Sep 8, 2022

Currently, we go from a large number to some small number based on relatively inaccurate assumptions. This may be a bit challenging to follow.

Advice was given to include a bottom-up model. E.g.
0. Compute how many shipments are performed yearly?

  1. What is the avg unit price on these shipments?
  2. How much can our protocol lower these unit prices (by means of improvements in algorithmic efficiency).
  3. What is that total profit increase for all those companies?
  4. What are the costs of using our protocol per unit, and what fraction of that profit can we take for our services?
  5. Then mention ok, for 5 companies, who process n units, we expect a revenue of y.

This makes it a bit more intuitive.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@a-t-0